- Mar 16, 2014
- 8,524
- 8,666
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
Solid argument!!!
Touché!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Solid argument!!!
Ramsey over Schaz??
Reid's contract was 4 yearsBen Reid is the reason we should never give 5 year contracts again at our Club.
Reid's contract was 4 years
Sidebottom says "what about me"???Ben Reid is the reason we should never give 5 year contracts again at our Club.
Sidebottom says "what about me"???
Are you sure Apex?
Bit harsh...Yep throw him on the pile........only guns deserve five years (Pendles) the rest don't.
That's one of the problems at the Pies we overrate our players.
Via the contracts thread...
http://www.collingwoodfc.com.au/news/2014-04-02/key-trio-commit-for-long-haul
I stand corrected MB........ok let me review no more four year contracts
Certain. 4 years @ $600kAre you sure Apex?
Bit harsh...
To an extent, agree with you about over-rate.
Maybe Treloar, then? Grundy maybe? and if Moore comes on as we hope, at the end of his current contract, 5 years wouldn't be that bad? Don't you think?
Certain. 4 years @ $600k
I stand corrected MB........ok let me review no more four year contracts
Treloar's on a 6 year deal. The exception...?
Disappointing selections. I shake my head everytime i see Langdon in the team, Breust will kick 5 on him and if hes on Silicly he will kick 5 and if hes on Gunstan he will kick 5. It wont matter who hes on they will kick 5, the hawks will pump us. The meltdown that WILL happen around 6pm Sunday will be epic reading.
Is that for all players, or staff only? I Heard we are only offering short term contracts for staff.Grundy yes.........the rest 3 years is more than enough. At the end of the day they "have" to want to be at the Club a contract shouldn't be the reason they stay. I use Reid as an example because he has become wayyyyy to comfortable at our Club.
I know someone close to the Blues recruiting department (yes I will have another shower after I typed that) and they are only offering one year contracts now and no big $ contracts.
Reward players but no more superannuation contracts.
I will use a Saintlyism........Premierships = success = reward and I am not talking monetary.
...........and Treloar.
We only have two elite players in our team IMO.........Pendles & Treloar.
I still think long term contracts are fraught with danger.
Is that for all players, or staff only? I Heard we are only offering short term contracts for staff.
(Oh, and doesn't the players EBA require 1st round draft pick to sign a minimum 2 year contract?)
But for the Blooze, they have nothing to lose.. There are only a couple of players you would want to poach (Casboult is not one of them..)
Long term contacts are too risky for a club, avoid them unless you really need to offer them for quality.
Hahahajahhshahafutsvbj ssv
Let's retain Langdon after 2 shitful games but drop our most talented swing man 1 week after returning. Reeks of a stealth injury to Reid.
Or we're tanking.
Or both.
Either way the match committee have officially lost the plot now.