Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
whats your theory then?
Good changes but left Schade out. I would've gone Schade in for Reid.
Not really. One of the reasons clubs give long term contracts is to minimize the risk of key players leaving.Long term contacts are too risky for a club, avoid them unless you really need to offer them for quality.
I think you don't know why because you are making it up, what is your evidence for the accusation?That's what he does. Don't know why.
Yes and I'd love Dunn forward and I would've dropped Langdon for what it's worth.So you'd play all of Dunn, Goldsack, Howe, Langdon AND Schade in the same back line? You're nuttier than the match committee!
Averaging 21 disposals, 5.3 marks, 3.1 tackles at 74% DE while adjusting to a new role this year, wish we had a few more ordinary players.Jack Crisp is very lucky. Ordinary footballer.
Not in the top 300 players in the afl. Ordinary.Averaging 21 disposals, 5.3 marks, 3.1 tackles at 74% DE while adjusting to a new role this year, wish we had a few more ordinary players.
Yes he is by all the stats, what's your evidence for saying that he isn't?Not in the top 300 players in the afl. Ordinary.
Oh you meant Schade, my mistake... and I agree.Not in the top 300 players in the afl. Ordinary.
Could be a coach Killing decision. Lose with Gunston, Breust, Roughead, O'Brien Schoenmakers getting a hold of us and media will be on him for dropping Reid.
Also tell me again how Cox is a better forward option than Reid??? Didn't Reid kick a couple late last week....if he'd been played there full game wondered how he would have gone.....
He's rolled the dice Nathan.....would want to win.
It's not that strange. We desperately needed another dedicated small defender for team balance. It's more a decision to play Langdon over Scharenberg. I wasn't as critical of Langdons game last week as some but surely you need to reward a 35 disposal game from Scharenberg in the twos?
Since a lot of Bigfooty posters love to use statistics to prove their point about certain players, lets see how statistics can be manipulated....If we win well Reid wont be back next week.
Jack Crisp has had more efficient disposals than you've had good posts.Jack Crisp is very lucky. Ordinary footballer.
Not in the top 300 players in the afl. Ordinary.
I think that points gets pushed too much. In his AFL matches he hasn't been able to get on the end of enough uncontested marks but that will come. His contested mark numbers have always been excellent. In his 5 VFL matches this year his marking stats have been off the chart. Especially the contested marks where he has averaged 3.4 a game which is extraordinary. He is an inexperienced KPF who still needs time. Think he will surprise a few people today.
Important game but nothing like make or break.
Jack Crisp has had more efficient disposals than you've had good posts.
His official player rating is 98th according to the Collingwood appNot in the top 300 players in the afl. Ordinary.
Not in the top 300 players in the afl. Ordinary.
Crisp ranked 94th in the league going into this round according to the AFL's player rankings.
His official player rating is 98th according to the Collingwood app
Yes but he's not in TGs top 100.His official player rating is 98th according to the Collingwood app