Isn't Webb the only one of them we have?Our first and a young non-top tier mid is fair value. That I would also do.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Richmond v Melbourne - 7:25PM Wed
Squiggle tips Demons at 77% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
Isn't Webb the only one of them we have?Our first and a young non-top tier mid is fair value. That I would also do.
Our first and a young non-top tier mid is fair value. That I would also do.
Lever for 2 first found picks.... Pass.
Do we even have any of those?
Webb, Dunkley, Hamilton...
99.956% of what is posted in this thread is pointless, but we still keep posting it.
Surprised you rate Dunkley so lowly, especially when I've heard cries for a legitimate inside mid for our best 22 all season long.Do we even have any of those?
Webb, Dunkley, Hamilton...
Considering he was pick 11 or so in his draft, im basing my opinion on that he has only added to his value. One top ten pick with steak knives maximum or I could stomach two late teens picks.What about if we first found the picks in the later rounds?
Surprised you rate Dunkley so lowly, especially when I've heard cries for a legitimate inside mid for our best 22 all season long.
We are not trading a nephew of a Jarman to Adelaide under any circumstances....
Maybe that was the plan all along. Sign Hamilton for an additional year and use him and his Jarman connection as trade bait to Adelaide for Lever. Astute list management strategy by us.
Agreed but then I also remember how many issues Easton had with his hammy's and now they seem to be over it, maybe our medical staff can do similar things with Lever.I rate Lever so highly but another little issue I have is these hamstring problems that are popping up. I think I saw someone say that his current hamstring issues could be related to his previous ACL where they use the tendon as he graft (possibly explains Bobs hamstring issues this year). I'm sure the club is all over this though.
Ugh. Surely Dale's worked hard enough to secure his spot that he won't be an arrogant prick about it on field.
Player has to agree to the trade, as he is still technically contracted during the trade period which limits the Crows' power.While they won't turn down a first rounder, if they end up getting first round offers from us, the Demons and the Saints then I wouldn't put it pass them to accept a lesser offer from either of them before us. They did take it really hard over the Talia situation in 2015 which was handled in a dodgy manner by the AFL.
This just feels so wrong. I'll be relatively unhappy if this is what we have to give up. And I rate Lever very highly.Adelaide get 2 firsts
Dogs get lever and their 2018 second.
Adelaide get 2 firsts
Dogs get lever and their 2018 second.
Where do we get the 2nd pick from? future 2018?
Yep.
Big price, but I think it's about right. He's ridiculous.
And isn't 2018 supposed to be a much better draft? And the Crows may not finish as high as they will this year. So a 2018 2nd has good value.
Lever's hamstrings are made of glass
Safety glass or normal glass? Big difference.
Isn't Webb the only one of them we have?
Quick tip - every draft is a superdraft one year out. I highly doubt the 2018 pool will be a stronger draft than 2017 by any major stretch. It will probably run slightly deeper, but there isn't going to be that much of a difference in player quality for a 2018 vs 2017 second rounder.Yep.
Big price, but I think it's about right. He's ridiculous.
And isn't 2018 supposed to be a much better draft? And the Crows may not finish as high as they will this year. So a 2018 2nd has good value.