MRP / Trib. PFD tackle on Kruzer - MRP grades it as 1 week suspension

[cats_09]

100/1 mate......

Suspect 3 weeks down to 2....its high impact to the head...sadly for Grundy, it has to be. That makes it worse than Dangers hence the prediction...(he'll be lucky if its less)..

No intent and his actions after the tackle were honorable.....but the look on his face showed he knew he was stuffed....

He's gone for all money.

I hope you're right because it would show a level of consistency two weeks in a row - I just don't trust them is all

 

[Mahlepi]

100/1 mate......

Suspect 3 weeks down to 2....its high impact to the head...sadly for Grundy, it has to be. That makes it worse than Dangers hence the prediction...(he'll be lucky if its less)..

No intent and his actions after the tackle were honorable.....but the look on his face showed he knew he was stuffed....

He's gone for all money.

There were 2 actions
So gone, as for Buckley saying it was a perfect tackle


3 down to 2

 

[lionbear]

as for Buckley saying it was a perfect tackle

He slammed him into the ground, there was no need it was doing to be holding the ball anyway.

I am all for defending the player, but this comment was just laughable by him.

 

[Burro]

I wonder what would happen if Collingwood was in finals contention....AFL hmmm

 

[AM]

One of the issues when you make a wretched call is that when something congruent crops up you're in all sorts.

 

[Nickoo]

Clearly worse then the Danger tackle yet Ling and the other commentators are trying to justify it and get him off.
Didn't see them go into bat for Danger last week though, f**ckin muppets!

I am definitely detecting an anti geelong flavour across the media with hypocrisy at an all time high especially from Ling. Very disappointed in him. As a note I think he is a crap special comments person anyway.

Grundy's gone. If he's not then there will be hordes out the front AFL house with placards calling for an investigation.

It was hardly a perfect tackle given he slung him which was the specific nature that this heightened focus was to address.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[rocker_oz33]

I just seen the grundy tackle yep hes gone.

Both tackles Danger and grundy no free kicks paid against but the MRP see a different view.

 

[sauron256]

I just seen the grundy tackle yep hes gone.

Both tackles Danger and grundy no free kicks paid against but the MRP see a different view.

Umpire paid HTB to Grundy.

 

[Rosso]

Umpire paid HTB to Grundy.

And then called for Grundy to hurry up and play on while.Brown was concussed on the ground. Duty of care 101.

But as usual they will revue the game and say that there was only one or two errors. That's why the officiating has become so bad. You can only learn from your mistakes if they are pointed out as mistakes...

 

[rocker_oz33]

Umpire paid HTB to Grundy.

I ment against grundy plus danger.

 

[rocker_oz33]

And then called for Grundy to hurry up and play on while.Brown was concussed on the ground. Duty of care 101.

But as usual they will revue the game and say that there was only one or two errors. That's why the officiating has become so bad. You can only learn from your mistakes if they are pointed out as mistakes...

Shithouse umpires.

 

[Cataholic]

I hope you're right because it would show a level of consistency two weeks in a row - I just don't trust them is all

One of the MRP (Burke?) has said that Grundy's tackle does not appear to be as 'unreasonable' as Danger's

EDIT: was Daniel Harford, not Burke

 

[DangerHere]

One of the MRP (Burke?) has said that Grundy's tackle does not appear to be as 'unreasonable' as Danger's

They are ****ing corrupt - watch Grundy get cleared.

 

[Munich]

Patrick Dangerfield-Lannister first of his name.

 

[Cataholic]

They are ******* corrupt - watch Grundy get cleared.

My bad......looked it up and was Daniel Harford who made those comments - former Tribunal member.

https://www.foxsports.com.au/afl/co...n/news-story/dc4ec930aec29b4a4c112a7c4b207442

 

[lionbear]

And then called for Grundy to hurry up and play on while.Brown was concussed on the ground. Duty of care 101.

Umpires have had a mare across all games so far this weekend,

 

[lionbear]

One of the MRP (Burke?) has said that Grundy's tackle does not appear to be as 'unreasonable' as Danger's

Absolute disgrace.

The only difference between the two is Paddy is expected to Psychically have worked out the ball has slipped out in the tackle.

Honestly starting to think the Melbourne media are jealous of the set up in Geelong and are just trying to screw us over.

 

[Catman]

Wonder if The Age are going to get their brain expert to comment on this incident and have Grundy suspended?

 

[geelong_crazy26]

If Dangerfield gets 2-1, grundy has to get 3-2 at least.

There is definitely a second sling action involved that is quite forceful, at no point does he try and soften the impact by rolling the player like Dangerfield did, it was as forceful as grundy could have possibly made it with the arms pinned.

Twice as bad and deserves 3 based on the Laughable suspension they gave Dangerfield as their publicity statement.

 

[Mahlepi]

ling
prefaces crap by saying he is a geelong man and sticks it to geelong players
crap comments - has taken harley to the next level

grundy was 2 actions, and deserves a more severe penalty
buckley should be fined

 

[you pick one]

One of the issues when you make a wretched call is that when something congruent crops up you're in all sorts.

Nomination for post of the year.

 

[Nickoo]

One of the MRP (Burke?) has said that Grundy's tackle does not appear to be as 'unreasonable' as Danger's

You are kidding me!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Cataholic]

You are kidding me!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Was Daniel Harford, former Tribunal member, not Burke (my bad), but yep, that's what he said apparently

 

[Micksy]

One of the MRP (Burke?) has said that Grundy's tackle does not appear to be as 'unreasonable' as Danger's

Maybe edit this to include your correction?

 

[Cataholic]

Maybe edit this to include your correction?

Good idea.

Done.

Thanks