Remove this Banner Ad

2017 trade hypothetical thread

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Rory Walkerfield said:
Cameron plus pick 35 to Brisbane for pick 18

Lever and 2018 third to Collingwood for pick 6, 2018 second and pick 57

Pick 17 and Collingwood 2018 second to Carlton for Gibbs and pick 56

Rockliff as a free agent

Adelaide Out: Lever, Cameron, pick 17, pick 35, 2018 third
Adelaide In: Rockliff, Gibbs, pick 6, pick 18, pick 56, pick 57 (to be combined with our pick 53 for our father son Jackson Edwards)
Click to expand...

I think you are in the wrong thread or don't support the crows. That is wildly sensible.
 
So the rule that a club needs to use at least two first round picks in a four year period (except Geelong apparently), is that requirement that they need to use two first round picks based on where they finished on the ladder, or can those first round picks be traded in (ie could it be a pick 18 traded in to satisfy the rule)? Also, can you satisfy the four year rule by using two first rounders in the one year?
 
Rory Walkerfield said:
So the rule that a club needs to use at least two first round picks in a four year period (except Geelong apparently), is that requirement that they need to use two first round picks based on where they finished on the ladder, or can those first round picks be traded in (ie could it be a pick 18 traded in to satisfy the rule)? Also, can you satisfy the four year rule by using two first rounders in the one year?
Click to expand...
Yeah having 2 picks in one season allows you to trade 2 first round picks in future years pretty sure Academy and father/Son are also considered as having 2 first round picks in one season if bid on in the first round of the draft
 
Rory Walkerfield said:
So the rule that a club needs to use at least two first round picks in a four year period (except Geelong apparently), is that requirement that they need to use two first round picks based on where they finished on the ladder, or can those first round picks be traded in (ie could it be a pick 18 traded in to satisfy the rule)? Also, can you satisfy the four year rule by using two first rounders in the one year?
Click to expand...

Didn't that rule get put off until 2019
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Am I right in saying the rule is you have to use two 1st round picks in four years but it doesn't have to be your own first round picks?

We traded 2015
We traded 2016
We traded 2017

But it's hard to penalize us before the end of 2018 trade period, especially given we've got up to four father-son picks in that draft and there's a distinct possibility we find a way to accumulate the picks so that we meet the AFL requirements using the bidding system to get our first 1st round pick in four years and our existing 1st rounder to get the 2nd.
 
Last edited:
Suma Magic said:
The rule was introduced in 2015 I think?

So the four year period ends 2018.

Given that clubs could still bring in first rounders as late as he last minute of the 2018 trade period, the afl couldn't really stop any trades until 2019.
Click to expand...
The rule was invented in 2015 but it won't be in effect until 2019.
 
Rory Walkerfield said:
So the rule that a club needs to use at least two first round picks in a four year period (except Geelong apparently), is that requirement that they need to use two first round picks based on where they finished on the ladder, or can those first round picks be traded in (ie could it be a pick 18 traded in to satisfy the rule)? Also, can you satisfy the four year rule by using two first rounders in the one year?
Click to expand...

Hehe :cool:
 
Madness101 said:
I just posted this in the Richmond section, but wanted to hear other opinions too...

Martin leaves Richmond. We get compensation pick in the top 3 or 5. We also have Geelong's first this year. Giving us say pick 3 or 4 & pick 15 & 16.

We offer GWS pick 3 or 4 & 15 for Josh Kelly. We also offer Melbourne pick 16 for Jack Watts.
Click to expand...
How do people still not understand the compensation rules?
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Madness101 said:
I always thought it also involved what the contract was being offered to the player... The top 25 % of a team's earners etc.
Click to expand...
He's talking about you giving the Tigers a top 5 pick, something that cannot happen.

The pick you would receive is a pick after your first round pick, so you'd have picks 15 and 16 if Martin left.
 
Beats said:
Does Jack Watts for Levi Casboult (with a possible swap of late picks in melbournes favour) sound fair?
Click to expand...
While i wouldn't mind that trade, its just not a need for us. If Cas leaves it will be through FA and we will bank the pick. Best bet would be to just offer him a decent salary and amount of years and you'll get him free
 
Beats said:
Does Jack Watts for Levi Casboult (with a possible swap of late picks in melbournes favour) sound fair?
Click to expand...

That is disgusting for Melbourne.

We have no need for Casboult, Cam Pedersen is better and cheaper.

Watts is in our best 18 let alone 22 but struggled for form (although shit delivery into the forward line didn't help him) since returning from his longest injury layoff of his career.
 
Dez! said:
That is disgusting for Melbourne.

We have no need for Casboult, Cam Pedersen is better and cheaper.

Watts is in our best 18 let alone 22 but struggled for form (although shit delivery into the forward line didn't help him) since returning from his longest injury layoff of his career.
Click to expand...

What would you guys want for Watts if he was on the table? Or rather what you rate as his draft pick value so to speak.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

I have been reading various reports from their draft years and the current threads. Who would be worth more at the trade table Matthew Kennedy or Jacob Hopper?

I was a Hopper over Kennedy man but I am liking Kennedy more and more over the last month or so.
 
jason pm said:
I have been reading various reports from their draft years and the current threads. Who would be worth more at the trade table Matthew Kennedy or Jacob Hopper?

I was a Hopper over Kennedy man but I am liking Kennedy more and more over the last month or so.
Click to expand...

IMO similar value.
 
Rory Walkerfield said:
Cameron plus pick 35 to Brisbane for pick 18

Lever and 2018 third to Collingwood for pick 6, 2018 second and pick 57

Pick 17 and Collingwood 2018 second to Carlton for Gibbs and pick 56

Rockliff as a free agent

Adelaide Out: Lever, Cameron, pick 17, pick 35, 2018 third
Adelaide In: Rockliff, Gibbs, pick 6, pick 18, pick 56, pick 57 (to be combined with our pick 53 for our father son Jackson Edwards)
Click to expand...

IMG_3067.JPG

One of the best I've seen and seems fair for all
 
Would you trade two first round picks this year for Hawthorns first next year?

I think the tigers and st kilda have 2 for example.
 
Luv_our_club said:
Would you trade two first round picks this year for Hawthorns first next year?

I think the tigers and st kilda have 2 for example.
Click to expand...

If you want to know how a club bottoms out for 5-10 years, this is how.

Hawthorn are a side with too many core old players that they need to replace to be trading future picks.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top