Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
If it came down to:What if without him we don't win the premiership?
We are not going to risk that to be spiteful.
Why are they mutually exclusive? It's not like lever plays = we win the grand final, or lever doesn't play = we lose the grand final. We can win the flag and he leaves.. we just don't play him.If it came down to:
1. Win a flag this year and he leaves or
2. Don't win a flag this year and he stays
I like option 1 best
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Levers plan in an ideal world is clearly to win the premiership with us then leave at the end of the year.
I say we throw a spanner in the works and play him in the prelim, and if we hopefully win tell him to sign a contract extension now or he's not playing in the grand final.
Thoughts?
What standing in the AFL community? No one gives a shit about us now.It would make us into a nation-wide laughing stock, dramatically weaken our standing in the AFL community
discourage other players from considering coming to the Crows, eradicate any semblence of trust our other players have in the club,
destroy any goodwill we may have had in trading Lever, probably lead to a legal challenge from the AFLPA,
and of course, lower our chance of actually winning the premiership when he rightly tells us to piss off and we have to go in without a best 22 player.
What standing in the AFL community? No one gives a shit about us now.
Players trust in the club? I think it's about time the club stops trusting the players with the amount of high quality walk outs we have had. Either sign up or get out.
Goodwill in trading lever? There's no good will to the crows as it stands... there was so much goodwill Shown to us with the Gibbs trade last year . Everyone just expects us to fold over. We showed goodwill from the way Dangerfield left. Yay. Goodwill. What does that get you when it's not reciprocated? Nothing.
As far as a legal challenge, you gotta be kidding? If we think our stronger side is without lever because his mind may be on other things like playing for his new club we are well within our rights to do it.
Debatable. If he really does have other things on his mind like this being the last time playing for he club etc who's to say what sort of performance he will put in? And When is he telling us to piss off? We aren't playing him cos he's leaving. That's us telling him to piss off. I don't understand what you are saying there?
Line in the sand imo. Everyone else has signed pretty much, if you're not with us you're against us and we don't need you on grand final day if we make it. We have been screwed enough by players walking out.
Time to show them enough is enough.
Well no one is ever going to say you didn't embrace your inner crazy
They're not necessarily mutually exclusive.Why are they mutually exclusive? It's not like lever plays = we win the grand final, or lever doesn't play = we lose the grand final. We can win the flag and he leaves.. we just don't play him.
Can we rename this thread "what can we get for Jake lever"
With the media coverage it has received, the whole AFL world will be shocked if he stays.Haha, seems like we have arrived at the point where a lot of posters are going to be absolutely crushed if he decides to stay on with us.
What did redhorse say?This could be redhorse 's defining moment. If we don't bring in a high quality mid this time, he has nowhere hide; but if we do... giddyup.
Very little really for the discussion it caused. Just said that we would have the best midfield in the comp.What did redhorse say?
With the media coverage it has received, the whole AFL world will be shocked if he stays.
Kern to GC on a five year dealAnyone hear the mail on lever or port list changes on triple m this morning? I assume it isn't anything but just annoying that i didnt hear it.
Well. . Dusty was never coming hereVery little really for the discussion it caused. Just said that we would have the best midfield in the comp.
Umm I think you misunderstood what I meant. All the media reports are being written as if he has already left, and isn't still playing for a team that has qualified for a prelim. Articles yesterday had discussions around what Melbourne will be giving up in a trade. There is no question on his talent and how good he will be in coming years.I know right.
Getting an amazing ammout of hype and media coverage for a crappy, slow, useless 1 on 1 unaccountable 3rd tall intercept player who plays the easiest position on the ground.A role which any untalented hack on our list could do just as well.
Dont understand what they see in him personally. Maybe its his fabled leadership skills or are these teams willing to pay such overs because he somehow slipped way up the draft and draft position is all that really counts these days when it comes to evaluating a players worth.
Not only all that, but the guy is already 21 so there gos 3 years of his best output right there.
I pity the fools.
Not if he re-signsCan we rename this thread "what can we get for Jake lever"
What did redhorse say?
Very little really for the discussion it caused. Just said that we would have the best midfield in the comp.
Who hear likes the sound of a straight swap for a high pick young midfielder who also done his ACL?