Danog
17 19 & 20 - Dynasty
Richmond were the best team in 2017
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Correction....Richmond/MRP were the best team in 2017Richmond were the best team in 2017
Add to this, the Friday night 7:50 time is a ridiculously late start in my mind.I wished the main Saturday and Sunday game still started at 2:10 not 3 o'clock. So when you watch on TV you can get the post match Analysis not just cut straight to the news
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
SaltyCorrection....Richmond/MRP were the best team in 2017
AccurateSalty
IrrelevantAccurate
Richmond were the best team in 2017
Ok just sweep under the carpet and move onIrrelevant
I would've relocated North to Tassie but since GC won't survive in the long run, I'd move them instead.
To the waning moons?Will have to change their name from the suns...
I dont agree that it would improve the quality of the comp. There are many 18-20 year olds that are better players than those older. It could do the opposite because older guys that aren't as good will be getting games.Raise the draft age to 20 or 21.
So many positives for football.
-Improves the quality of the Comp
-increases certainty in the draft meaning greater equalisation in the long hall.
- even improves player welfare.
- improves the quality of lower level leagues (WAFL/ SANFL/ VFL)
So So many positives. This needs to happen asap.
I dont agree that it would improve the quality of the comp. There are many 18-20 year olds that are better players than those older. It could do the opposite because older guys that aren't as good will be getting games.
Do people still sit down and watch the 6 pm news?Not sure why the weekend news needs a big ratings-grabbing lead-in anyway. I mean, don't people take a break from the news on weekends?
The tv executives doDo people still sit down and watch the 6 pm news?
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
I dont agree that it would improve the quality of the comp. There are many 18-20 year olds that are better players than those older. It could do the opposite because older guys that aren't as good will be getting games.
I think you will find they already are doing that for the few players in their 30s that still deserve to be on a list. Short of going the soccer route, and routinely rotating players out of the squad so they have a lighter load. Even then, I am not sure it will help, as a large part of the performance drop is simple age, not wear and tear. Also, would a club play a star in only 2/3s of games from the time he is 25, in the hope they get a couple more years from him in his 30s?Maybe we should be doing more to lengthen careers.
Ffs, Boomer Harvey was still one of the clubs best and got shown the door for no other reason than his age.
With a bit of work I'm sure clubs can extend most careers to 35 if the player is good enough and keeps fit, and their should be an AFL incentive to do so.
Sent from mTalk
I'm not sure if it's unpopular, but I don't think Richmond was even close to the best team this year.
My first thought was how embarrassing for the competition that they won the flag.
The easiest draw and no injuries were obviously the key plus having no fear or respect from other sides.
Next year will be a thumping letdown.