Hard to believe this thread exists, I wouldnt mind Hurley in our team he is a good player one of the best defenders in the comp but to compare him with Rance well it is just silly.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Richmond v Melbourne - 7:25PM Wed
Squiggle tips Demons at 77% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
I didn't read it, I saw it happen and saw the replay several times and swore it was Hurley.The Hurley that was outmarked by Gary Rohan looked a lot more like Marty Gleeson - and was wearing Gleesons number.
Classic case of someone learning all about the game from what they read on Bigfooty - someone posted the same error after that game.
BTW Rance was brilliant in the GF. No shame in Hurley being 2nd best to him.
Rance is better than Hurley.
Having said that, I would love to see how Hurley would play with a good midfield actually stopping the other team waltzing through the middle like a parade.
Second best defender will always be compared the first. Unfortunately, Rance's final series put Hurley a fair bit behind.Hard to believe this thread exists, I wouldnt mind Hurley in our team he is a good player one of the best defenders in the comp but to compare him with Rance well it is just silly.
Gets itRance is like Jason Cloke. Plays on no-one. Intercepts well. Disposal quality once getting the ball can be doubtful at the best of times. Might explain why he handballs more than he kicks.
Rance put up with the same over the previous 3 seasons (worst pressure and tackling side in the comp) and has been AA and been seen as the best defender over that period also
Silly argument. Our midfield was awful last season. Rance was still incredible.I am not saying Hurley would be better than Rance.
Rance is a better player than Hurley.
All I want to see is how good Hurley could be if he had a good defensive midfield for once
Rance is like Jason Cloke. Plays on no-one. Intercepts well. Disposal quality once getting the ball can be doubtful at the best of times. Might explain why he handballs more than he kicks.
Hurley is basically thrown to the wolves every week playing on the big bastards. Handles it as well as anyone. Can kick 60m on both feet (and like Fletcher was in his time, quite effective when charged with kicking goals from long range).
It's Bonecrusher v Our Waverley Star really.
Ahh Pazza, if it wasn’t for the years of reading your posts I’d think you were trolling, but you no doubt genuinely believe this, which is even more concerning.Rance is like Jason Cloke. Plays on no-one.
Ahh Pazza, if it wasn’t for the years of reading your posts I’d think you were trolling, but you no doubt genuinely believe this, which is even more concerning.
Hi Pazza.Anyone recall the last time he played on an opponent? Any opponent?
Hi Pazza.
The sport is AFL, it’s the most elite competition in the country....but you think an AA fullback plays on none and does his own thing.
Either pull your head out of your arse or be gone.
No, it’s ability and output. Not one coach would knock back Rance.It's all hype and ego. People fall for it all time on here and elsewhere. If you were a coach you would have Hurley. If you are a fan you want Rance.
How did Jenkins go in the grand final?Anyone recall the last time he played on an opponent? Any opponent?
Rance plays on and beats quality opponents a lot more then Hurley does.It's all hype and ego. People fall for it all time on here and elsewhere. If you were a coach you would have Hurley. If you are a fan you want Rance.
It's all hype and ego. People fall for it all time on here and elsewhere. If you were a coach you would have Hurley. If you are a fan you want Rance.
It's all good.No, it’s ability and output. Not one coach would knock back Rance.
You’re a clown. Be gone.
Anyone recall the last time he played on an opponent? Any opponent?