muzhogg
Club Legend
- Sep 9, 2017
- 2,092
- 10,012
- AFL Club
- Richmond
Support he got? I think it was the opposite, he was the one who gave others support. Dusty was as coal face as you could get.
I think that remark needs a bit of clarification.
It's well known that Dusty splits his time between midfield and forward, with Dimma saying that Dusty is the one who makes the call as to when and where he plays.
Obviously, when Dusty moves forward it leaves a hole in the midfield, and when he moves to the midfield it leaves a hole forward.
The trick is to allow Dusty to go where he's needed without leaving an exploitable weakness elsewhere.
Which is where Prestia and Caddy come in. Very crudely (and I mean _very_) Prestia and Caddy have served to fill the holes that Dusty leaves when he moves mid to forward (or vice versa). Prestia plays midfield when Dusty moves forward, whilst Caddy plays forward when Dusty is in the midfield.
So it's thanks to Prestia and Caddy that Dusty has the flexibility that lets him impact games the way he does. That flexibility would take a hit if Caddy and Prestia were taken away.
Another way to say this is just to acknowledge your point that Dusty was indeed as coalface as it's possible to be. My point is simply that he was able to be at the coalface precisely because other players, Prestia and Caddy being two of the most important, made it possible for him to be there.
So that's what I mean when I say Prestia and Caddy "supported" Dusty. When Dusty played forward we still had a very competent midfielder in Prestia to play midfield and when Dusty played midfield we still had a very competent forward/mid in Caddy to play forward. Dusty could play either position without leaving any glaring holes for the opposition to exploit.