Topkent
Confirmed ITK Drafting King
I can't believe Cox is firmly a part of their best 22. It's like if Jack Fitzpatrick was your main full forward.
Fitzy was so much better than Cox. Had decent pace for a big lump of a lad
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I can't believe Cox is firmly a part of their best 22. It's like if Jack Fitzpatrick was your main full forward.
That’d be greatReckon pies will be bottom 4 with brisbane and Carlton to surpass them
I think you have to have De Goey in there, for now anyway.Its a fair point, but look at their 22.
B: Howe Dunn Goldsack
HB: Crisp Moore Scharenberg
C: Wells Pendlebury Varcoe
HF: Elliott Reid Fasolo
F: Daicos? Cox WHE
R: Grundy Treloar Sidebottom
Int: Blair Maynard Adams Greenwood
Yes, the inside brigade rocks. But those KPP stocks are average, and there's nothing behind them.
True but probably not til Rd5. Replaces Maynard.I think you have to have De Goey in there, for now anyway.
Can't agree, think Cox has the potential to get on top of a defender which Fitzy never did. Still pretty s**t otherwise though.Fitzy was so much better than Cox. Had decent pace for a big lump of a lad
They love Maynard at Collingwood, would think that Scharenberg would make way. Roos made me laugh yesterday though, talking about his laser kicking off HB. Never seen a player more prone to a shank, reminds me of Melksham when we played him there. Tough but pretty useless by foot.True but probably not til Rd5. Replaces Maynard.
Can't agree, think Cox has the potential to get on top of a defender which Fitzy never did. Still pretty s**t otherwise though.
Well ostensibly he would replace Blair but Blair could be caught committing murder and still play on Saturday. Unfathomable how he continues to get a game.They love Maynard at Collingwood, would think that Scharenberg would make way. Roos made me laugh yesterday though, talking about his laser kicking off HB. Never seen a player more prone to a shank, reminds me of Melksham when we played him there. Tough but pretty useless by foot.
Well ostensibly he would replace Blair but Blair could be caught committing murder and still play on Saturday. Unfathomable how he continues to get a game.
Can't agree, think Cox has the potential to get on top of a defender which Fitzy never did. Still pretty s**t otherwise though.
He would still be on a list, but only because he’s 211cm, some coach (from basketball I think) had a saying, if you’re over 200cm, you’ve got 5 years to show you aren’t up to it, when you’re under 180 you’ve got 5 mins to show you are.Confident if Cox was not an American import, he would have been long ago ejected from an AFL list, that's if he even made one in the first place. That experiment has gone beyond silly. It's like having the unco spare ruck as your full forward. Sure he might snag a couple of marks, but if the ball hits the ground he becomes a total liability.
Now watch him kick 40 goals this year.
He would still be on a list, but only because he’s 211cm, some coach (from basketball I think) had a saying, if you’re over 200cm, you’ve got 5 years to show you aren’t up to it, when you’re under 180 you’ve got 5 mins to show you are.
He’s a target down forward because he’s so tall, and he will continue to get opportunities, if not from taking the mark himself, then from the undersized defender panicking and giving away a free kick. But as you say, as soon as the ball hits the deck, he’s a liability. If he was my main target down there I’d be very worried
He would still be on a list, but only because he’s 211cm, some coach (from basketball I think) had a saying, if you’re over 200cm, you’ve got 5 years to show you aren’t up to it, when you’re under 180 you’ve got 5 mins to show you are.
He’s a target down forward because he’s so tall, and he will continue to get opportunities, if not from taking the mark himself, then from the undersized defender panicking and giving away a free kick. But as you say, as soon as the ball hits the deck, he’s a liability. If he was my main target down there I’d be very worried
He’s done an amazing job to play league footy given how short he is. He must have been phenomenal as a kid.I played country footy with Blairy, he was on another level to everyone but it shows how much physical attributes are needed at AFL level.
He’s done an amazing job to play league footy given how short he is. He must have been phenomenal as a kid.
Yeah I lived down at Tidal River for just under two years and saw some South Gippy League games. I was very surprised at how good the standard was. I think the league is close to ****ed now though. No numbers.Like a young Shane Crawford. Clean hands run all day between the 50s. Brilliant agility etc. Dominant midfielder in the south gippy league back in the day which for anyone who's seen Gippsland footy is a bloody good standard.
Few boys came from that area. Mitch Golby, Roughy, Heppell, Trent West, Docherty, Brent Mcaffer etc. Played against a few of them. In underage footy he was as good as Heppell and Rough.
Won the larke(?) Medal for the best player at the national carnival.
Yeah I lived down at Tidal River for just under two years and saw some South Gippy League games. I was very surprised at how good the standard was. I think the league is close to ****** now though. No numbers.
Geelong's depth on display right now. Missing Danger, Ablett, Selwoodx2 and Taylor, but still with plenty of players who will be filling their 22 come Round 1, and they're being absolutely canned by Gold Coast. With a minute before 3qrt time, the margin is 54 points, they've managed 2 goals for the game, and as far as I can tell, their forward line is pretty close to full strength ... and it serves them right for that sleeved monstrosity of a jumper.
God I hope so.Geelong will be saved by their home ground and flopperfield. But outside that and the duck they are average. They will be a meal for us round 1.