But it's still an alpaca.He can put forward that opinion, I can disagree with that opinion. Both have been occurring in this thread.
I agree with some aspects of his views regarding the participation of Mouncey in the AFLW / VFLW, I disagree with his approach to how he refers to Mouncey.
I’m not sure an Alpaca is self-aware enough to feel any kind of distress over whether or not it is a sheep, but it also sounds like the sheep aren’t making an effort to point out how different or wrong the alpaca is either.
I’m glad we’ve clarified that sheep are more tolerant than people.
So it's ok to call someone a "confrontational a-hole" but not ok to call a pre-transition female (a male) 'he'? This is where the argument is lost. BTW are you a mod here?No, and no.
But there is a time and place for everything. Nobody is telling you what to think or to change your mind. What I, and others, are telling you is that your particular mindset and the way you express it is not appropriate in this thread. Feel free to espouse your views elsewhere. Would you go into a known LGBTQwhatever-friendly bar, order a pint, and announce to all and sundry including the resident transgenders that "blokes have dicks and if you have a dick you're forever a bloke and that's that!"? Perfectly valid viewpoint, you're entitled to that opinion, but you'd be being confrontational for the hell of it.
Edit: Removed over-the-top comment from quoted post - OTP
Last edited by a moderator: