Oh so he wasn't attempting to spoil at all. Carry on then.It's clearly absurd to suggest he was trying to spoil with an elbow. It would be perceptive if you sense me snorting with contempt.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Oh so he wasn't attempting to spoil at all. Carry on then.It's clearly absurd to suggest he was trying to spoil with an elbow. It would be perceptive if you sense me snorting with contempt.
That's incredibly irrational, but as usual not surprising.Oh so he wasn't attempting to spoil at all. Carry on then.
You think I haven't watched the video?
The logical flaw is thinking it supports you conclusion.
Please, educate me wise one on the incredible irrationality of what I said.That's incredibly irrational, but as usual not surprising.
Even though it wasn't intentional. Clearly you've seen the words confirmation bias somewhere and thought it would cool to use them, where do you think confirmation is coming from in this case?The logical flaw is actually you failing to realise your own confirmations bias if that's your interpretation after seeing the video. Dog act, intentional and severe based on the MRPs own interpretations it has laid out this year. Has prior history of it and has really failed to demonstrate any meaningful contrition. It couldn't possibly be more open and shut than this.
I don't like the idea of Red Cards but if ever there was a case that best ex
You think I haven't watched the video?
The logical flaw is thinking it supports you conclusion.
Even though it wasn't intentional. Ckearly you've seen the words confirmation bias somewhere and thought it would cool to use them, where do you think confirmation is coming from in this case?
You cant, even if you try really hard, to think of a case of striking that might be more clear cut?
Saturday was the first time I thought the red card idea was a good one. Cameron took out their best defender and kicked a goal within a minute of the game restarting.
I would only like the card to be used if the injured guy can't play out the game though.
Early days on the thought process. Were you reported?So you'd be ok with me staying out on the ground if I deliberately kneed someone in the ribs and punctured their lungs as long as they weren't undergoing a concussion protocol?
I’ve got contempt for you and anyone else who suggests that he was trying to spoil at all when he arrived at the contest after Andrews has already cleared the ball and at no stage was leading with his fist.
View attachment 517518
If he had his arm extended, sure, you could claim it was careless/reckless. But he knew EXACTLY what he was doing. He’s already got the elbow out when Andrews is doing what Cameron is apparently attempting and spoiling the ball. Which, incidentally, is above his head and nowhere near where Cameron’s fists are.
When Tom Jonas got 6 weeks for his hit on Gaff, at least it LOOKED like a spoil gone wrong.
Great idea for that clear incident.Seriously. When a player intentionally/recklessly takes another player out of the game, a suspension isn't enough.
Jeremy Cameron will get 4 weeks for his hit on Harris Andrews, but that doesn't change the fact that Brisbane are now without their best player for the rest of the game. Red cards work in soccer, why not in footy too?
I'm not suggesting that red cards be thrown out for any incident that causes harm to another player - a dangerous tackle, or an accidental head-high bump shouldn't result in a red card. But when it is as messed up as this incident, surely it is justified?
The hit in question: http://www.afl.com.au/news/2018-06-23/andrews-knocked-out-by-crude-hit
It’s worked in other sports
It needs a trial
We can use video to determine a goal
We can use video to determine thuggery
No.
Most of them are too incompetent to properly utilise the power they already have.
It's the equivalent of giving a loaded pistol to a 4 year old kid.
No.
I’m purely talking for king hits which are pretty easy to see on video
Cameron should have been sent off
Great idea for that clear incident.
What happens with the other 30 a year which are not so cut and dried? What about the constant errors the umps will make, the idiotic "throws" to the "bunker" for yet another ****in Umpire to cast his oyster-ed old eye over the inconclusive footage. How will we redress the blatant misappropriation of the vaguely worded rules when games are lost in total debacle.
Umpire already have too many tools to totally ruin the game. Do not hand them a "placard' to wave to gain more personal attention.
I honestly think people who advocate changing the rules all the time should be banned form Bigfooty, even banned form membership in the clubs.
They can go and start a new forum, call it "Big Meddling" or "let's ****it for everyone" or similar.