LanceRomance
Brownlow Medallist
Why did we pick Polson, look at how well Powell-Pepper played
Sent from my SM-G920I using Tapatalk
Wrong thread for it... SPP is a first rounder, Polson is a third or fourth rounder
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Why did we pick Polson, look at how well Powell-Pepper played
Sent from my SM-G920I using Tapatalk
Powell-Pepper was taken by Port Adelaide before we took Zac Fisher. Polson was about 40 Picks later.Why did we pick Polson, look at how well Powell-Pepper played
Sent from my SM-G920I using Tapatalk
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
I see we are following the joke
Sent from my SM-G920I using Tapatalk
This jokeI reckon I'm going to start making these posts at random.
"Why did we pick Cripps, look how good Boyd played tonight"
"Why did we pick Murphy, look how good Harris Andrews played tonight"
"Why did we pick Dow, look how good Curnow played tonight"
Lol wooosh a few times
LOB trained with the boys prior to the draft and clearly rated him, give him time to grow he will be a gunSorry, I don’t want to sound like a broken record BUT Ed Richards for the Bulldogs was excellent tonight. Why did we take LOB instead of him?
Is it because SOS is a bit of a snob and got sucked in by the boy who went to Geelong Grammar?
For the sake of our club let’s hope not...but I’m not so sure
The media are just lazy group think clowns. The ones who can tell a proper list build are few and far between (Dunstall, Brereton, Carey and Lyon).
Ed Richards isn't the first ready made footballer to be taken in the teens and have a great rookie season (and then plateau shortly there afterwards). The problem is as the more potential laden kids start to catch up physically Richards low upside means he's much closer to his maximum output from day one. That's great if you want a consistent proven performer and have high potential prospects elsewhere but for a club like Carlton who needs to maximize future potential talent over trying to challenge for the finals right away it's absolutely the right move to draft in an O'Brien ahead of him.
Ed Richards isn't the first ready made footballer to be taken in the teens and have a great rookie season (and then plateau shortly there afterwards). The problem is as the more potential laden kids start to catch up physically Richards low upside means he's much closer to his maximum output from day one. That's great if you want a consistent proven performer and have high potential prospects elsewhere but for a club like Carlton who needs to maximize future potential talent over trying to challenge for the finals right away it's absolutely the right move to draft in an O'Brien ahead of him.
Why did we pick Polson, look at how well Powell-Pepper played
Sent from my SM-G920I using Tapatalk
I hope this is true. Deserves to be a one club player.Murphy set to re-sign with us next week, or early the following week.
The only offer he was considering was with Geelong.
I'm not so sure that O'Brien's long term upside is any higher than Richards'.
Both will be quality footballers for 10-12 years.
Richards' line-breaking speed and balance is really nice.
In my opinion, O'Brien hasn't even scratched the surface of what he's going to be capable of long term. Soapy V - please correct me if I'm wrong - but I see someone who will eventually be a modern day Craig Bradley in this team. A great winger who also gets a lot of his footy on both flanks and breaks the game open with speed, skill, and those booming kicks.
In my opinion, O'Brien hasn't even scratched the surface of what he's going to be capable of long term. Soapy V - please correct me if I'm wrong - but I see someone who will eventually be a modern day Craig Bradley in this team. A great winger who also gets a lot of his footy on both flanks and breaks the game open with speed, skill, and those booming kicks.
I'm not so sure that O'Brien's long term upside is any higher than Richards'.
Both will be quality footballers for 10-12 years.
Richards' line-breaking speed and balance is really nice.
Thanks very much for the update Soapy.Has the running power of Bradley so maybe. All I know is expectation was 5-8 games this year so well ahead. Needs some size and strength to handle AFL and is working hard on it. Benefits of getting games has been huge. Another pre season or 2 will make a massive difference to him. At the moment not showing the poise or decision making levels he did as a junior and that's purely because he is being pushed around and fatigued. Still very very young. Coaches are very happy with progress.
Dare I say I think he plays a bit like Josh Kelly in that he will run and link and his ball use will be of a high level. Josh is now 23 and 90 games. His first 2-3 years were okay but nothing like last 2.
Lochie will kick goals as well as a midfielder. Like others patience is needed but very happy at this stage.
It's all a sum of the parts exercise.
As it stands, the CFC currently have 2 players that require stopping at all costs; Cripps & CCurnow.
Dow shouldn't be too far behind and then we have Docherty and to my mind, Marchbank, just at this stage.
Not every player has to set the wheel rolling, but just to be a cog in the machine.
I don't really care for too many individuals in a team sport, but just the right parts of the total sum.
Should SPS and Weitering reach potential, we may find ourselves with plenty of match-winners on the park. The trick is then up to the coaches.
I agree. I went to a private school and yes, we are better than other people.![]()
I cant believe some people are questioning LOB. HE'S 5 GAMES IN!