Jared Polec

Remove this Banner Ad

Enviable Tradition said:
In hindsight we were all wrong about the Hartlett deal, it has proved to be a shrewd move and he was playing his best football this year prior to injury and with the increasing salary cap is definitely not getting paid overs, so why are we now holding it up as an example of the club getting it wrong?

Time will tell but perhaps Hartlett and Polec are both examples of the club getting it right, contrary to BF opinions.
Click to expand...
Nup poor deal imo
 

Log in to remove this ad.

What does it say about norf when they offer a guy almost an additional 2 million dollars in guaranteed money and said player still going back to Port trying to get them to come to the party because he doesn’t want to leave

He’s gonna go but it seems it takes almost double the money to make the decision and even then it’s done begrudgingly
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

benblinkau said:
He is having a shoulder reco... again!!! So i expect his output to be the same


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

He’s not having a reconstruction. He’s most likely having surgery to free up his shoulder due to adhesion/scar tissue from the original surgery.
 
As I posted on June 26th and got shot down by a few people, the position hasn't changed.

You don't hand a five year deal to a player that the medical staff believe has only 2-3 years left in him. Can you imagine the uproar when we have a guy sitting on our list for two years that can't play when we knew all along this would be the case?

I can just imagine the pitchforks that'd come out by the same people screaming to sign him up now. Screenshot_20180831-072626.jpg

Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk
 
Winestoppable said:
As I posted on June 26th and got shot down by a few people, the position hasn't changed.

You don't hand a five year deal to a player that the medical staff believe has only 2-3 years left in him. Can you imagine the uproar when we have a guy sitting on our list for two years that can't play when we knew all along this would be the case?

I can just imagine the pitchforks that'd come out by the same people screaming to sign him up now. View attachment 552133

Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
But didn’t Rodney Eade say ‘Glass ankles Charlie’ would never play more than 13 games per season or something to that effect?
 
Winestoppable said:
As I posted on June 26th and got shot down by a few people, the position hasn't changed.

You don't hand a five year deal to a player that the medical staff believe has only 2-3 years left in him. Can you imagine the uproar when we have a guy sitting on our list for two years that can't play when we knew all along this would be the case?

I can just imagine the pitchforks that'd come out by the same people screaming to sign him up now. View attachment 552133

Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

Yeah, like how when Shaun Burgoyne went to Hawthorn and had to retire after 2 years because of his troublesome knee.
 
Shaxx Attaxx said:
He should be fine by next April surely
Click to expand...

He clearly wasn’t this year... and if it’s more invasive, how on earth will he recover faster than he did this year?

Yet we gave him big money and long terms... will he ever get back to anywhere near his best?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Capital Power
  • Locked
Game Day The Dumont-Polec Shield, North v Ports R9
38 39 40 41 42
Replies
1K
Views
14K
dirty2
dirty2

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top