Catoggio76
All Australian
- Sep 21, 2017
- 661
- 841
- AFL Club
- Carlton
- Banned
- #151
A lot. His mob won 2016 flag during the negotiations for ESS. Bulldogs a rabble since. Coincidence?What's Peter Gordon got to do with it?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
A lot. His mob won 2016 flag during the negotiations for ESS. Bulldogs a rabble since. Coincidence?What's Peter Gordon got to do with it?
It's called "good bloke" cover.
What up man.A lot. His mob won 2016 flag during the negotiations for ESS. Bulldogs a rabble since. Coincidence?
Did you ever get an answer from Chief about why bigfooty was sponsoring the Bombers during the saga and how it impacted the moderation of the site?
so when essendon also paid Paddy Ryder and other players who left Essendon, who's salary cap would that come under?Without AFL intervention the club would have folded. The were allowed to make payments which should have come under salary cap.
That should have been EFC.so when essendon also paid Paddy Ryder and other players who left Essendon, who's salary cap would that come under?
I think they were appreciative for the naming rights.Lucky we found one that does eh.
A lawyer engaged on a settlement couldn’t give two shits about Dyson’s employment contract or Essendon’s salary cap situation or accounting.
Hey, there’s an extra $150k on the bill for Dyson, I’m adding it for the other guys too. Easy.
Their job is to get as much as they can to line the pockets of their clients and more importantly, themselves.
Do you know any lawyers?
so part of essendon's salary cap should be used to pay compensation for players who arent playing for essendon?That should have been EFC.
i understand why it wasn’t but you have rules and they need to be kept.
When you move the goal posts as a matter of survival it devalues all the rules.
Idealistic I know but the clean up after the saga was dodgy.
I do actually, plenty.
And none are half as stupid as you seem to think they are
EFC should have been responsible for the salaries of the suspended players.so part of essendon's salary cap should be used to pay compensation for players who arent playing for essendon?
Seriously? That's pretty stupid logic
compensation isnt salary. What if 3 players were given 4mil each in compensation, and none of them played for Essendon? That would exhaust their entire salary cap for players who dont even play for the clubEFC should have been responsible for the salaries of the suspended players.
Called accountability but it’s probaly not a word EFC are familiar with.
That would've been fair punishment for what the EFC put the competition through.
It is if your club cheated by using drugs preventing you from playing elsewhere.compensation isnt salary. What if 3 players were given 4mil each in compensation, and none of them played for Essendon? That would exhaust their entire salary cap for players who dont even play for the club
compensation isnt salary. What if 3 players were given 4mil each in compensation, and none of them played for Essendon? That would exhaust their entire salary cap for players who dont even play for the club
The “Bradbury” Brownlow.I might consider Trent Cotchin legitimate too except he was only the second best player in 2012 and shouldve been rubbed out and missed the 2017 grand final.
Luckiest player of all time.
I think they were appreciative for the naming rights.
An insurance fraud conviction is the real grand finalImagine supporting a club that has a good chance of winning a grand final and starting a thread about insurance.