Not sure why people are so keen on trading pick 5 IF Neale falls through this year....would much rather keep and take one of the top players that pretty much every reputable source has said are substantially better than the rest of the draft.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not sure why people are so keen on trading pick 5 IF Neale falls through this year....would much rather keep and take one of the top players that pretty much every reputable source has said are substantially better than the rest of the draft.
Omg he better be right cause this kind of get on board and destroy what exists immediately will be a disaster if Tink’s wrong. Off siding people, wrecking relationships, making people with contracts feel vulnerable. Tink could keep us entertained for a year or two.
Precisely.Imagine another kid the caliber of raynor.
He came in like a wrecking baaaaalllllll......
Would be really disappointed if we missed out on him this period.
We all would be, but we'll be fine. I feel sorry for Lachie though. Can't see how he can go back and play for a year after this circus. A year out of footy would be tough.
Well there was never anything wrong with plan A in the first placeIt could be time to go back to that neglected 2018 Draft Thread. Trade 5 and next years 1st for the Crows 8, 13 & 16 and hit the draft hard for one more year.
Then concentrate on the free agents market next year ie. Lachie Neale and Stephen Coniglio.
Now who do we take with 8, 13 & 16?
Not sure why people are so keen on trading pick 5 IF Neale falls through this year....would much rather keep and take one of the top players that pretty much every reputable source has said are substantially better than the rest of the draft.
Omg he better be right cause this kind of get on board and destroy what exists immediately will be a disaster if Tink’s wrong. Off siding people, wrecking relationships, making people with contracts feel vulnerable. Tink could keep us entertained for a year or two.
Not sure why people are so keen on trading pick 5 IF Neale falls through this year....would much rather keep and take one of the top players that pretty much every reputable source has said are substantially better than the rest of the draft.
Yeah my room for disappointment is reducing by the hour. Swap those bloody picks and stuff Bell and Rosich.
Would definitely be a bad result if we lost beams, don’t get Neale, even if we did get a great rookie or 2, IMO.And when beams walks out we have gone backwards. We still need to make this work.
On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app
I do, I do. However, 2 to 3 is vastly different to 5 to 8 when there is a consensus top 7 prospects (not including Blakey)Remember when we split a pick and ended up with McCluggage and Berry?
Remember when we split a pick and ended up with McCluggage and Berry?
Lol. You only get one Alan Bond in your lifetime & we've had ours. Not saying we screwed anyone over, but boy, the stars did align for us.
Hehe, I don’t think it will be a total random rolling of the dice if we decide to do another pick swap though.
I think it will be based on Noble and Conole taking a deep, educated look at that first round, seeing who they like and where they expect them to go.
If they think they can get two players they really, really like who are a good fit for us, they should go for it.
If they rate the top 5 as far above the test as some others do, they wouldn’t be looking at splitting the pick.
Hehe, I don’t think it will be a total random rolling of the dice if we decide to do another pick swap though.
I think it will be based on Noble and Conole taking a deep, educated look at that first round, seeing who they like and where they expect them to go.
If they think they can get two players they really, really like who are a good fit for us, they should go for it.
If they rate the top 5 as far above the test as some others do, they wouldn’t be looking at splitting the pick.
Given Dizzy is holding #27, I think Neale will look good in #7 don't you all think?
I do, I do. However, 2 to 3 is vastly different to 5 to 8 when there is a consensus top 7 prospects (not including Blakey)
Geez that main board thread is a complete cesspool of idiotic repeated positions on each side. Seriously do the lions fans posting over there think that Freo owe us anything in these negotiations. Are they not just doing the same sort of thing many have bleated about wanting our club to do in trades in the last for players leaving us?
On the other hand I do think Freo could have handled this better from a public perception POV. Despite what fans say players and managers do take note of how clubs treat players both coming and leaving, and when decisions have to be made in the future, how these things are perceived can come back to bite you, whether they are accurate or not.
As for Neale, in the FA era has there been a case of a club holding a player who wants out to his contract. I'm struggling to think of one. Culture within a footy club can be a hard thing to get right and you can't help but wonder what affect having a player in your club who is bitter at the club and doesn't want to be there has on the group. They can be the best professional, but it only takes some frustration to come out in conversations away from the football club to start other players questioning how the club would treat them in an adverse situation.
Personally I don't see too much wrong in freos actual position but I do think how they've handled it message and timing wise is a bit misguided looking for forward