kaiserchief13
Hall of Famer
- Jul 12, 2011
- 33,890
- 24,696
- AFL Club
- West Coast
- Other Teams
- Eagles, Lakers, Bayern, Trojans
They should check the bets before accepting them. If they accept it it should be fair game
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: St Kilda v Western Bulldogs - 7:30PM Thu
Squiggle tips Saints at 51% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
They should check the bets before accepting them. If they accept it it should be fair game
Yeah it's funny they don't reject it at the start in case it loses anyway.......bet is accepted it is not the consumers fault their technology is s**tHe will get a decent payout but probably not all of it because of the negative publicity that TAB will get as the general nuffy wont understand what is going on
My question is if the bet lost would the TAB refund it? no ******* way
They didn't refund the bet anyway. They settled it as a loser...He will get a decent payout but probably not all of it because of the negative publicity that TAB will get as the general nuffy wont understand what is going on
My question is if the bet lost would the TAB refund it? no ******* way
Wanting the TAB to have a person manually check every single bet is such a dumb * opinionThey should check the bets before accepting them. If they accept it it should be fair game
Fix their technology then. Pay to have more employees or pay to improve the techWanting the TAB to have a person manually check every single bet is such a dumb **** opinion
His mistake was betting to win $150k. He's clearly found a loophole he's not entitled to collect on and if he puts $1 on it he probably gets through to win $4k without it being picked up
They didn't code something properly thus should be stung $150k?Fix their technology then. Pay to have more employees or pay to improve the tech
The amount is irrelevant. They will not fix anything unless they lose money from it. Giving them an out just means they will continue with their garbage systems screwing more peopleThey didn't code something properly thus should be stung $150k?
lol. the screwing here was not done by the TABThe amount is irrelevant. They will not fix anything unless they lose money from it. Giving them an out just means they will continue with their garbage systems screwing more people
At 1am on Grand Final morning, you’d be lucky to have anyone of importance working then.Fix their technology then. Pay to have more employees or pay to improve the tech
They accepted his money then told him it was a losing ticket....lol. the screwing here was not done by the TAB
IT actually was in a small scale. If he didnt ark up or if he had lost he would have not gotten his $36 bucks back, So basically the TAB is saying if we screw up, not only are you not going to get paid, if you dont even realise the bet was always void we are going to keep your money anyway. I can only imagine how many times the TAB have done this.lol. the screwing here was not done by the TAB
Yes that part is wrong, it should be a voided bet and money back.They accepted his money then told him it was a losing ticket....
They took the bet should pay it end of story.
Why? It would be breaking the rules. So what is your justification?
Their terminal took the bet should of had program in place to stop multi bets in a multi bet if he didnt win would they of refunded the bet? At the end of the day they took the bet pay out the bet. The court will see it the same way.
Their terminal took the bet should of had program in place to stop multi bets in a multi bet if he didnt win would they of refunded the bet? At the end of the day they took the bet pay out the bet. The court will see it the same way.
Firstly, it is the VCGLR, not a court.
Secondly, there is no conceivable way that the VCGLR or any court would pay out the full bet.
It is a punter taking advantage of a clear error on related events.
Edit: I'd be highly surprised if VCGLR didn't just decide that this matter is outside their mandate based on past actions. Although, this is clearly a matter that should fall within their jurisdiction.
You've gotta learn the rules before you play the game.
They took the bet though so no problwm taking his money on illegel bet? Thier at fault.