So let me get this straight.
Your logic is that 12 good games from Gleeson isnt enough to establish himself in the 22 in his position.
However only 3 or 4 good games from Francis (who like Gleeson has shown little in the previous 2 years to this at AFL level to bestow the messianic reputation he enjoys) and what in reality was 1.5 good games from Ridley is enough to convince you they should start in the 22 and above Gleeson?
Oh boy.
Yes, sure, that's clearly what I was saying.