Player Watch Lachlan Sholl

[Deaneus!]

 

[dogs105]

and congratulate here

Welcome Izak!!

 

[Deaneus!]

bump

 

[Danger in Texas]

*Sholl

 

[Squiba]

Who the fuxk art thou?

 

[The Smith Revolution]

His old man and uncle were very good AFL players FWIW

 

[LiquidCrow]

Has a decent pedigree - son of Brett Sholl who played for Carlton, and related to Craig and Brad Sholl who played for North.

 

[Golumless]

Looks very outside, though I do like the apparent high accumulation.

 

[spexau]

Neat highlights package. Seems to have a good kick. I can't work out whether he's a lefty or righty though which is nice.

 

[CutAboveTheRest]

Has a decent pedigree - son of Brett Sholl who played for Carlton, and related to Craig and Brad Sholl who played for North.

Awesome sets us up for future trade swaps..

 

[bigdog43]

As good a young bloke as you're likely to meet and a real accumulator across half back. You got a good one !

 

[StonesThrow]

Looks like a neat player on both sides

 

[Scorpus]

Probably the only pick I'm iffy on going on his reported lack of contested work. But at pick 64 it's hard to complain, that's speculative player zone

 

[pjcrows]

Pure speculative pick, see what happens. Looks okay.

 

[1990crow]

No confidence on this pick but hope he comes good.

 

[Bicks]

Probably the only pick I'm iffy on going on his reported lack of contested work. But at pick 64 it's hard to complain, that's speculative player zone

Me too, contested footy is high on my list of must haves and that's his weakness at this point in time. Needs space to execute effectively but there's no doubting his pace and foot skills. When ever I've seen the Cannons he's often the designated kicker so the Cannons rate his foot skills.

 

[DangerSloane]

Probably the only pick I'm iffy on going on his reported lack of contested work. But at pick 64 it's hard to complain, that's speculative player zone

Outside is what we need.

 

[hey shorty]

Dont know too much about him so did some digging. Looks like he could be a Rat replacement in the side and also as whipping boy unless he improves his contested work.

Cant really complain about a pick 64 though, its very speculative that far down. We have certainly addressed a need for speed and footskills this off season.

 

[RedmanWasHere]

Looks like he could be a Rat replacement in the side

They are Calder Cannons boys so there's that connection.

 

[Shaz2012]

I really wanted a Hamish special and he hasn’t let me down. Purely speculative so I don’t care what knocks he has. Now it’s down to our development. Would be absolutely unreal and unexpected if we get a star out of this pick. Good luck Lachie. Welcome aboard.

 

[dplggr47]

Not sure why we needed to upgrade 3 picks to get him in the early 60s, but whatever. Purely speculative pick, so if he achieves anything as a pick that high, that is already a win.

 

[Mr MysteryGuest]

Probably the only pick I'm iffy on going on his reported lack of contested work. But at pick 64 it's hard to complain, that's speculative player zone

I wonder what we would have done with this pick if we didn't do the carlton trade.

 

[Brenton Davy]

Neat highlights package. Seems to have a good kick. I can't work out whether he's a lefty or righty though which is nice.

Kicking style on the right reminds me of Smithers but you're right, he looks very good off both pegs

 

[macca23]

Me too, contested footy is high on my list of must haves and that's his weakness at this point in time. Needs space to execute effectively but there's no doubting his pace and foot skills. When ever I've seen the Cannons he's often the designated kicker so the Cannons rate his foot skills.

Would it be fair to say from his highlights that there's a bit of Polak about him??

 

[Red mist]

Did a Scholl play for Norf in ‘98?
Ha.