Australian Cricket Broadcast Rights 2018 - 2023

Remove this Banner Ad

The games I fear for are the Tests against Sri Lanka, the crowd for those might be lamentable particularly if India touch us up.

The timing of those two tests are odd. Just as people start to get over cricket, are watching the Australian Open and thinking ahead to the footy seasons CA somehow thinks its a grand idea to end the summer with two tests against a lowly opponent. No one will go to the Brisbane test but at least Canberra will have the novelty factor and all the public servants will be back from their Christmas breaks.
 
The timing of those two tests are odd. Just as people start to get over cricket, are watching the Australian Open and thinking ahead to the footy seasons CA somehow thinks its a grand idea to end the summer with two tests against a lowly opponent. No one will go to the Brisbane test but at least Canberra will have the novelty factor and all the public servants will be back from their Christmas breaks.

They would have scheduled them prior to the Indian tests, but Sri Lanka are currently hosting England.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

The timing of those two tests are odd. Just as people start to get over cricket, are watching the Australian Open and thinking ahead to the footy seasons CA somehow thinks its a grand idea to end the summer with two tests against a lowly opponent. No one will go to the Brisbane test but at least Canberra will have the novelty factor and all the public servants will be back from their Christmas breaks.
A day night test over the Australia Day period should be enough of a novelty factor to draw people in I think.
 
The timing of those two tests are odd. Just as people start to get over cricket, are watching the Australian Open and thinking ahead to the footy seasons CA somehow thinks its a grand idea to end the summer with two tests against a lowly opponent. No one will go to the Brisbane test but at least Canberra will have the novelty factor and all the public servants will be back from their Christmas breaks.
One spot below us.

Also I think it's good they are trying to extend cricket's window. Every other sport does it, so why can't they?
 
CA spinning bullshit as well, saying it's not possible to broadcast cricket without Foxtel. Free-to-air channels now have multiple channels, 10 said they would broadcast everything, men's and women's. It's possible, they just wanted the cash now, screw the future.

That is true, but you're probably talking about hundreds of millions of dollars difference between the bid they accepted and a FTA only bid. That can buy a lot of junior cricket sets.
That's not to say CA made the right call, but it's not quite as easy as simply saying "we only want FTA".
 
That is true, but you're probably talking about hundreds of millions of dollars difference between the bid they accepted and a FTA only bid. That can buy a lot of junior cricket sets.
That's not to say CA made the right call, but it's not quite as easy as simply saying "we only want FTA".

The Foxtel/Ch7 bid was for $1.2 billion and the Ch10 bid was for around $1 billion so about a $200 million difference.

That extra money might help CA buy some more junior cricket sets but there will also be a lot of junior cricketers that can't watch ODI/T20 games on FTA now.
 
The Foxtel/Ch7 bid was for $1.2 billion and the Ch10 bid was for around $1 billion so about a $200 million difference.

That extra money might help CA buy some more junior cricket sets but there will also be a lot of junior cricketers that can't watch ODI/T20 games on FTA now.

Most of those kids will watch big bash anyway.

$200 million for a few short form games plus the occasional BBL game on Fox isn't exactly a terrible deal. Especially when you get games on 7 instead of 10.
 
Most of those kids will watch big bash anyway.

$200 million for a few short form games plus the occasional BBL game on Fox isn't exactly a terrible deal. Especially when you get games on 7 instead of 10.

10 do a better job with sport than 7 do and it may not be a terrible deal money wise but it's a disgraceful deal in terms of robbing the game of FTA exposure.

The head honchos at CA that agreed to this deal should be hanging their heads in shame but they won't care as long as they get their bonuses for securing the biggest tv rights deal in terms of dollars, screw the majority of the Australian public that now can't watch ODIs and T20s because they don't have Foxtel.
 
Why should sport automatically be something that is still available for free in the modern era?

With cricket for example, there’s a lot more games across the Aussie summer now, it makes sense not all are on FTA. The majority still are on FTA anyway.
Because I'm a cricket fan, not a capitalist or marketing graduate. Sport on free-to-air TV isn't free, it's paid for by advertising. So the question is, why should we pay more for something now than we used to, what's the justification for the fan (we know what the justification is for Foxtel and CA executives). To paraphrase Bill Hicks, we need to quit putting a goddamn dollar figure on every ******* thing on the planet.
 
Why should sport automatically be something that is still available for free in the modern era?

Because the matches in question are on the anti-siphoning list and thus the minister believes they should be on FTA tv.

A loophole has been found that enables them to be put behind a paywall and that loophole needs to be closed.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

I have foxtel but I still can understand why people are shitty here, you could make the case the anti siphoning list is no longer feasible but that's a different duscussion the reality is the list is there right now and foxtel ca and seven colluded to bypass the list meant to protect fans.

If those in charge decide the list has no place in this current era of streaming services then so be it, change the rules and deal with any political fallout that comes with it but making rules and then allowing multiple separate media groups to collude to bypass them defeats the purpose of the list while allowing the government to say it's still protecting the fans when it clearly didn't.
 
Last edited:
Pretty confident the Australian support will be as strong as ever during the Test series. A few of the Indians I spoke to last night who were up and about for the T20 weren’t really interested in attending tests, whereas for Aussies it’s generally the opposite case.
Red or red curry indians? there is a slight difference and they will shuffle the decks to make the point..
 
Michael Clarke allegedly stated he is not happy with lack of free to air cricket (view shared by 1000s of australians). Would his viewpoint be any different if he was working for foxsports?

he would probably word his response very carefully, e.g. "ideally all Australia home summer matches should be televised on FTA, but we're pleased to bring you coverage of all matches here on Fox Cricket."
 
Michael Clarke allegedly stated he is not happy with lack of free to air cricket (view shared by 1000s of australians). Would his viewpoint be any different if he was working for foxsports?
Michael Clarke, speaking on Macquarie Sports Radio, owned by Fairfax/Nine, was criticising the TV rights deal secured by News/Seven, neither of whom hired him?

Well blow me down....
 
The Grade Cricketer boys will be doing a show on Channel 7 on Tuesday's during the test series according to their podcast.
If the videos they've been doing for Cricket Australia are anything to go by they should probably stick to twitter/podcasts.
 
If the videos they've been doing for Cricket Australia are anything to go by they should probably stick to twitter/podcasts.
hopefully it’ll be fairly similar to their podcasts but simply on TV
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top