Current Claremont Murders - The Bunker

Is Bradley Edwards the Mystery Man in the CCTV?

  • Yes

    Votes: 28 82.4%
  • No

    Votes: 6 17.6%

  • Total voters
    34
Status
Not open for further replies.

Sammy1987

In for a penny, in for a pound...
Jan 1, 2019
61
5
AFL Club
West Coast
I havent heard a thing about police asking questions on gay relationships and what profiler made the cross dresser call? I thought it was only me that did that. To a hailstorm of criticism I might add!

thought you did - the cross dresser call - not Melsy at all. stop your nonsense.
 

Sammy1987

In for a penny, in for a pound...
Jan 1, 2019
61
5
AFL Club
West Coast
And you just believe it is 100% legit.
From an anonymous email sent to you?
seems pretty legit right at the moment judging from the reaction of some people. unsure who that was but probably served as confirmation for whatever they were seeking. shame you can’t ask them.
 
Mar 21, 2016
73,855
116,779
Down South Corvus Tristis
AFL Club
Adelaide
Other Teams
Sturt, White Sox
So I wonder if other POIs are out of the woods yet? I hear most of them have


I think Droc's musings were not unfounded, but maybe a broader group of people up to no good. I think we will hear there were other operators working the same area.

When asked if he would provide DNA and answer questions, he refused because he didn't trust police. Wouldn't police already have his DNA for other crimes? Maybe not, and maybe he stood to be charged for other crimes once on a criminal database.

Who were the people in the taxi, where the woman broke her ankle climbing out?

I think there will be witness's rolling in as the evidence rolls out. More dots to dot connections. Past suspicions conformed.

In the fray of the investigation, which was enormous, a lot of people were turned away. Trial outcomes might confirm other suspicions. Police will be waiting for this also.
A lot of this is valid but I think there will be a narrow focus on what is basically in front of them (prosecution) . If they start entering all this other stuff it confuses.

I think if there is anything to be gained it will come out as a separate charge/issue. Its easier to charge someone as an accessory once the central figure is convicted ( making no aspersions on the current accused)
 
Mar 21, 2016
73,855
116,779
Down South Corvus Tristis
AFL Club
Adelaide
Other Teams
Sturt, White Sox
What was interesting, is certain users were abusing other users for saying the CSK case had DNA. The abusers were adamant there was no DNA to this crime.
.
To be fair all the reports stated the police recovered no DNA from the 2 women found. I make no assessment on the Peter Weygers and the search for ' organic material'

The current accused has only been linked through the DNA from the Kimono and assumed DNA from the Karakatta assault.
 
Mar 21, 2016
73,855
116,779
Down South Corvus Tristis
AFL Club
Adelaide
Other Teams
Sturt, White Sox
this is very true crow. he says he is not guilty. did you notice the defence has tried to spilt the charges. know what that means?
I think there could be a feeling/thought that by getting the charges split the propensity might vanish

As an example he may challenge the DNA on the kimono , recall the handling with no gloves etc, he may ( and I dont say this lightly) force the girl to recall the Karakatta attack and to try and identify him from over 25+ years later.

If these charges are removed then the Prosecution need to link the 3 missing women, and as they are hoping to link all the attacks to one person, the dismissal of some charges weakens the case.

Just thoughts on a defence tactic
 
Mar 21, 2016
73,855
116,779
Down South Corvus Tristis
AFL Club
Adelaide
Other Teams
Sturt, White Sox
I never claimed to be an expert but it doesn't take a genius to suspect a man who's stealing womens underwear and clothing might be wearing them.
That is one explanation and most likely. There is also the external masturbatory element to it
 

Sammy1987

In for a penny, in for a pound...
Jan 1, 2019
61
5
AFL Club
West Coast
Only in the eyes of the law. Individuals are allowed their own opinions on guilt or innocence or they may have no opinion at all.
agreed. twitter. many individuals are now in a position to form their own opinion. mine was cast when I saw what was online elsewhere. guilty as sin.
 
Last edited:

Sammy1987

In for a penny, in for a pound...
Jan 1, 2019
61
5
AFL Club
West Coast
What was interesting, is certain users were abusing other users for saying the CSK case had DNA. The abusers were adamant there was no DNA to this crime.

It was not the only point users were abused over. There was tolerated skullduggery by another forum owner.

Extreme aggressive online behavior which turned out to be totally and utterly wrong. There was DNA. Moderators on an online forum did nothing about the predatory behavior, almost condoning the behavior, but moderators took a scolding hand at the victims, victims who turned out to be right on more than one occasion.

There certainly seemed an active campaign in another forum to derail what turned out to be the truth.

Some of the victims were wolf packed by users with the blind eye of that forum owner.

very true Melsy. seemed to start online with one contributor - ex military Phantom - in 2006/07 and it was a very consistent theme thereafter. in fact one contributor went on with the “no DNA” claim obsessively. found it very strange given they also did a very detailed analysis about Droc and was still posting well after the arrest. wonder why they were so insistent there wasn’t DNA. how would they know and why were they so insistent in pushing what was later proved to be disinformation. from what I have read there was significant aggro towards anyone who suggested there must be DNA evidence - given that there had been extensive DNA testing and suspects publicly cleared based on it. December 2016 must have been a shock to them.
 
Last edited:

Sammy1987

In for a penny, in for a pound...
Jan 1, 2019
61
5
AFL Club
West Coast
If discussions with some certain people I spoke are true, there were people who knew of this crime. Heavily following by a certain demographic you wouldn't expect.

I don't think there will be another in the area. If you knew the security in place, it is ten times harder than 1996.

This why I became suspicious of the Santen (Paton) case. If it were a crime, it were on the peripheral of security, but not outside. Without a body, I'm not so certain. We heard the Inquest, but there is no body.

Robyn Paton was dropped off by taxi, then gets in car and drives to City Beach carpark. Takes a towel? Never seen again?

Classic girl leaves nightclub stuff.

Look at the Rayney case, marital issues, but was someone else inside the relationship? We were just lucky to discover a body. Rayney was defending a cop in a CCC trial at the time. Not a popular man with criminals.

again strong post. very surprising following. Clancy’s fish pub. santen went to Iona and UWA and did a published masters thesis on the wetlands. would be having a look at that background and associations. not buying into the suicide finding at all. someone has a thing for dates and themes. likewise Rayney. noted that new POIs have relatively recently been identified. would not be surprised at all if these are connected in some way. know who I’d be talking to.
 
Last edited:

Sammy1987

In for a penny, in for a pound...
Jan 1, 2019
61
5
AFL Club
West Coast
Interesting SB.

Dr Phibes posts of 7 & 8 July 2007 were too.

Also comments posted by that retired ex military fella “Phantom62”:

“One thing I will say with confidence. The police should not be looking for the Claremont Serial Killer. They should be looking for a serial killer who is responsible for up to 24 disappearances and murders including 3 from the Claremont area. Serial killers do leave trails in the location of their victims bodies” - 12 July 2007

“Probably male but also a cross dresser” - 5 June 2007

“The killer has preselected from a list he had possession of, I think I know where each victim was murdered (the same place), they were probably kept in this place after their death and then driven to their dumping grounds the following night” - 5 January 2007

Many references throughout those blogs to SASR including responses from P62 himself.

“One thing I will say with confidence. The police should not be looking for the Claremont Serial Killer. They should be looking for a serial killer who is responsible for up to 24 disappearances and murders including 3 from the Claremont area. Serial killers do leave trails in the location of their victims bodies” - 12 July 2007 Phantom62.

up to 24 disappearances and murders including 3 from Claremont.

so he was tying Claremont together with up to another 21 disappearances and murders?

don’t doubt that Phantom knows what he is talking about except about there being no DNA.

all that confidence after all.

but thats a pretty specific number and big claim.

next time we see the ex military man Phantom online maybe he can explain this and list out the 24.
 
Last edited:

sprockets

Cancelled
Crime Board Sleuth BeanCoiNFT Investor
Oct 15, 2004
5,562
9,546
Melbourne
AFL Club
Richmond
Other Teams
Richmond
“One thing I will say with confidence. The police should not be looking for the Claremont Serial Killer. They should be looking for a serial killer who is responsible for up to 24 disappearances and murders including 3 from the Claremont area. Serial killers do leave trails in the location of their victims bodies” - 12 July 2007 Phantom62.

up to 24 disappearances and murders including 3 from Claremont.

so he was tying Claremont together with up to another 21 disappearances and murders?

don’t doubt that Phantom knows what he is talking about except about there being no DNA.

all that confidence after all.

but thats a pretty specific number and big claim.

next time we see the ex military man Phantom online maybe he can explain this and list out the 24.
Can't wait for all those charges to be laid. When do you reckon that will be? My educated guess is never. Old 'Phanto' hasn't got much right at all, so far.
 

Krusty Crab

Team Captain
Jan 5, 2019
564
1,272
AFL Club
West Coast
Other persons of interest to officially a suspect, include Peter Weygers the former Mayor of Claremont, Lance Williams RIP, Judo Man, the IT expert who tried to pick up a young girl on the Stirling Highway, Mosman Park and Mark Dixie who raped and stabbed a girl in her apartment before leaving Australia. He went on to murder Sally Ann Bowman back in the UK.

Can anyone share some more info regards Judo Man and the IT expert mentioned in the above part of a post from Shelly G? ( first post in this thread) this is the first i have heard of either of these people?
 
“One thing I will say with confidence. The police should not be looking for the Claremont Serial Killer. They should be looking for a serial killer who is responsible for up to 24 disappearances and murders including 3 from the Claremont area. Serial killers do leave trails in the location of their victims bodies” - 12 July 2007 Phantom62.

up to 24 disappearances and murders including 3 from Claremont.

so he was tying Claremont together with up to another 21 disappearances and murders?

don’t doubt that Phantom knows what he is talking about except about there being no DNA.

all that confidence after all.

but thats a pretty specific number and big claim.

next time we see the ex military man Phantom online maybe he can explain this and list out the 24.


Brett Christian of The Post was also of the view the Claremont serial killer was another "Eric Cooke", responsible for many more murders. You could shoot him off an email and ask him to explain himself, he's easy to find and writes under his real name
 
Other persons of interest to officially a suspect, include Peter Weygers the former Mayor of Claremont, Lance Williams RIP, Judo Man, the IT expert who tried to pick up a young girl on the Stirling Highway, Mosman Park and Mark Dixie who raped and stabbed a girl in her apartment before leaving Australia. He went on to murder Sally Ann Bowman back in the UK.

Can anyone share some more info regards Judo Man and the IT expert mentioned in the above part of a post from Shelly G? ( first post in this thread) this is the first i have heard of either of these people?

Hi Krusty.

The IT specialist Mosman suspect.

Described as a chameleon, spotless car and fastidious personal presentation but who lived in a house of abject squalor. Engaged in group sex and fetishes. Came to police attention after being disturbed trying to lure a girl into his car on Stirling Highway around 2.00am. This must have been in 2007?

Police weren't able to eliminate him as CSK because he has no alibi for the nights in question. DNA right? I dont think they had a full profile in 2007.

https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/attachments/cskmosmansuspect-jpg.542176/

Apparently he was under surveillance for a year and cleared in 2009. I dont have anything on the judo guy I can access atm.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back