I find it interesting that noone other than Carlton supporters can see the 'logic' around how they are managing their list.... and this post sums up the Carlton threads in the main board to a tee.
Opposition poster makes s**t argument about Carlton. Carlton poster responds. Opposition makes s**t argument again. Carlton poster tells them their argument is poor. Opposition makes s**t argument for the third time, not addressing anything in any oppositional post, nor really making a case beyond "player x is s**t", "WHy didn't the blues pick up Lambert? How did you miss him?!!!", "Lobbe is a list cloggggerrrrr!!!1".
Carlton fan calls opposition poster a troll. Fadge pops up with this particular gem. Rinse, lather, repeat.
I could go into your desire to paint my perspective as 'outlandish, unrealistic, illegitimate, baseless' - I'm surprised you left off heretical, or slanderous, or outrageous - despite the fact that the claim I made was statistically based, by the metrics of goals averaged per match, and by hitouts. So, at the very least, baseless is out. I could also say that no-one has actually tried to make the counterargument to that position in any way statistically; so, the claim itself stands. So, outlandish and unrealistic is out, and so is illegitimate.
I'm also rather amused by the extent to which your posting becomes more audacious and plentiful when you have support.
... so, how about it, Fadge? You going to step upto the plate, actually commit to doing some analysis, rather than just talking from your arse as is the usual?
I suggest there is some substance in the opinions of the supporters of the other 95% of teams in the competition, given where Carlton are currently at, and where they have been for the best part of the last two decades.
You refer to other posters comments as 'shite arguments' on the basis of you being right and the majority being wrong. More than happy for you to continue to believe that, if it means we get more performances from Carlton where 2018 came from.