Politics Violence against Nazis, acceptable?

[Chief]

Case in point.

 

[its free real estate]

How do you know that it's a common discussion point among trans activists?

Because I’ve read their discussions.

 

[Mofra]

Because I’ve read their discussions.

Where?
The trans people I know are very big on consent and boundaries which is why I find the hypothetical so ridiculous.

 

[CM86]

Because I’ve read their discussions.

How do you know they believe that?

 

[its free real estate]

How do you know they believe that?

Have you got to the bottom of why no one responded to Lebbo73, officer?

 

[its free real estate]

Where?
The trans people I know are very big on consent and boundaries which is why I find the hypothetical so ridiculous.

Right here on Bigfooty. RobbieK himself has expressed that if a person turns down a transgender person for sexual, there is probably an element of transphobia.

 

[CM86]

Have you got to the bottom of why no one responded to Lebbo73, officer?

Why are you trying to 'deligitimize' me, by giving me authority?

Can you not just be genuine?

Right here on Bigfooty. RobbieK himself has expressed that if a person turns down a transgender person for sexual, there is probably an element of transphobia.

Are you part of the bigfooty police now?...

 

[CM86]

It was the forum’s cop, CM86, who brought it up.

I brought up, in the almost 100 page thread (that is arguing against violence against Nazis, and in some points insisting they have the right to what they say)... that there are posters openly stating their should be violence against minorities.

And it's my fault that the same ilk of posters have turned it into an attack on Trans people?... Maybe it's the posters...

 

[its free real estate]

I brought up, in the almost 100 page thread, that is arguing against violence against Nazis... that there are posters openly stating their should be violence against minorities.

And it's my fault that the same ilk of posters have turned it into an attack on Trans people?... Maybe it's the posters...

Lebbo37 didn’t state there should be violence against minorities. Lebbo37 said the trans person who reacted violently to being called “sir”, to the point of destroying property and threatening others, should be met with violence.

Maybe you can dispute the level of response but to twist that into “violence against minorities” is absurd.

 

[its free real estate]

Why are you trying to 'deligitimize' me, by giving me authority?

Can you not just be genuine?


Are you part of the bigfooty police now?...

Mofra asked and I answered. I’m not monitoring every thread for potential crimes, like you.

Why don’t you apply to be moderator?

 

[CM86]

Lebbo37 didn’t state there should be violence against minorities. Lebbo37 said the trans person who reacted violently to being called “sir”, to the point of destroying property and threatening others, should be met with violence.

Maybe you can dispute the level of response but to twist that into “violence against minorities” is absurd.

A neo-nazi drove into a crowd, and killed a women, while injuring many...

A trans 'person' knocked over a display after being refused a refund, and Lebbo37 said he'd take a bat to that person's head...

But you're not able to have an honest discussion, so why am I bothering to reply?

 

[its free real estate]

A neo-nazi drove into a crowd, and killed a women, while injuring many...

A trans 'person' knocked over a display after being refused a refund, and Lebbo37 said he'd take a bat to that person's head...

What is the relevance between these two statements?

Also, in bold is false.

But you're not able to have an honest discussion, so why am I bothering to reply?

I don't know why you bother with anything you do. A hopeless case.

 

[CM86]

Mofra asked and I answered. I’m not monitoring every thread for potential crimes, like you.

Why don’t you apply to be moderator?

Mofra responded to a bigoted post.

You ignored the context, and asked him to provide proof of his dispute.
You then supported the bigoted post, by saying it was true based on the postings of others in a forum you didn't disclose.
Apparently you're still the victim?

 

[its free real estate]

Mofra responded to a bigoted post.

You ignored the context, and asked him to provide proof of his dispute.
You then supported the bigoted post, by saying it was true based on the postings of others in a forum you didn't disclose.
Apparently you're still the victim?

This post makes no sense. Who is claiming victimhood? Why does it matter whether I disclose the postings of others or sources I have read? Why is the post 'bigoted'?

 

[Proud SJW]

We were talking about the rise of Nazis and other RWNJs. Hence my reference to them.

But sure, those murderous nutters too.

This is one thing that irks me in many discussions: talking about an issue, you bring up a relevant example. This gets the response "WHY DON'T YOU MENTION THE SOCIALISTS TOO?!?!"

Because your answer wasn't relevant to the question.
You were the one pointing fingers at extremists.

 

[CM86]

What is the relevance between these two statements?

People called out ANTIFA for their violence.
We are in the thread that is "Violence against Nazis, acceptable"

There are literally pages of people opposing violence against Nazis, while no one seemed to have a problem at all, with Lebbo wanting to take a bat to the skull of a trans 'person'.
People defended the scum who drove a car into an anti-racism protest more than anyone defended the trans 'person' in the shop. Let alone the poster saying they'd take a bat to their skull.

The relevance is the thread.

Also, in bold is false.

I only watched the video once. What was the customer upset about to begin the recording?
How was it different to hundreds of American public freak-outs that are posted daily? Apart from being trans?

 

[jatz14]

Not sure if you're aware, but I'm one of the least PC posters here, and the post of mine that you quoted was not serious. It was more about highlighting hypocrisy.

In your hypothetical I would be rather cross, and tempted to take option 2. But would instead take a less polite version of option 3. They should have been upfront to begin with.

And most trans would be fine with that, despite the straw man argument put forward

Sent from my XT1068 using Tapatalk

 

[jatz14]

It isn’t ridiculous though, it’s a common discussion point among trans activists.

Lol. You question his assertion based on his friendship with trans friends, but your argument is, it's a common discussion point amongst trans activists?

Which trans activists? Can you point me in the direction of said discussions? Or is your knowledge of these discussions limited to the comments section of Facebook.

Sent from my XT1068 using Tapatalk

 

[Chief]

Because your answer wasn't relevant to the question.
You were the one pointing fingers at extremists.

The thread is about Nazis. But yes you did talk about all extremism in that post.

Glad we have cleared that up.

 

[Proud SJW]

The thread is about Nazis. But yes you did talk about all extremism in that post.

Glad we have cleared that up.

_Wildcard_ said:
Still find it strange that most still seem to believe extremism (of any sort) arises in a vacuum.
Minerva from the head of Zeus, NTTAWWT! There it is, like magic.

There's justifiable, proportional responses, and then there's fascism, the alt-right and all the associated uglies.

That was the conversation in question. You know, the one where you responded to me.
Do try to keep up.

 

[Chief]

That was the conversation in question. You know, the one where you responded to me.
Do try to keep up.

So you responded to tell me what I had already said?

 

[Chief]

Mofra asked and I answered. I’m not monitoring every thread for potential crimes, like you.

Why don’t you apply to be moderator?

If anyone knows about sexy stuffs, it's Mofra!

 

[Proud SJW]

So you responded to tell me what I had already said?

My reply is No.

 

[Chief]

My reply is No.

Try again?

 

[medusala]

The thread is about Nazis. But yes you did talk about all extremism in that post.

Glad we have cleared that up.

But there arent any actual nazis are there? There may be neo nazi / far right left thugs etc but not actual nazis.