Thanks to climate change nonsense we have just had a massive number of blackouts sending businesses broke and people out of jobs.
Hopefully your alleged business wasn't effected
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Thanks to climate change nonsense we have just had a massive number of blackouts sending businesses broke and people out of jobs.
20 records in a day vs 2 in 1896 is such a solid comparison
I'vebeen to Moomba and that kind if temperature isn't uncommon at this time of the year. Certainly high fortiesThe hottest temperature recorded during the course of the heatwave was 49.6 °C (121.3 °F) at Moomba in South Australia. Found online 24jan19 : The highest maximum temperature was recorded as 50.7 °C (123.3 °F) at Oodnadatta on 2 January 1960, which is the highest official temperature recorded in Australia.
Angry Summer - Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angry_Summer
As far as I can see, deniers generally fall into two categories:
1. Religious conservatives who think the earth and its creatures is a god-given bounty for mankind to do with as it pleases.
2. Free market fundamentalists who regard government intervention in the market as the greatest evil - the first step on the slippery slope to full blown Stalinism. These are the people who systematically denied the causes of acid rain, ozone depletion and lung cancer. In many cases they know the science is clear, but they are puppets to their economic beliefs.
On the other hand:
1. Fossil fuel companies pay lobbyists to peddle misinformation, lies and cherry picking of facts. Now who is it that benefits from a status quo on climate change action? Fossil fuel companies and the longevity of their profits.
2. Teachers rely on peer reviewed scientific evidence.
3. What are you talking about.
Yeah see these high temperatures are not new. Anomalies happen and there is nothing new under the sun. Even an ice age.The hottest temperature recorded during the course of the heatwave was 49.6 °C (121.3 °F) at Moomba in South Australia. Found online 24jan19 : The highest maximum temperature was recorded as 50.7 °C (123.3 °F) at Oodnadatta on 2 January 1960, which is the highest official temperature recorded in Australia.
Angry Summer - Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angry_Summer
Mark Steyn ... lolI would say I made assertions not assumptions about the corrupting influence that the renewables sector (and the cult of global warming) has had on science. Assertions that can be backed up with evidence.
For example, Donna Laframboise's analysis of how the IPCC process works. Or Mark Steyn's book about Michael Mann's fraudulent Hockey Stick.
View attachment 602648
If you want to make assumptions about the influence the fossil fuel industry has had then go right ahead. But, logically, I would contest your argument that such assumptions lead to a conclusion that the fossil fuel industry has corrupted the science to a greater degree.
You.......******* LolMark Steyn ... lol
This is one of the best essays on climate change I have ever read, and should silence both the moronic deniers and the hyperbolic Cassandras
https://palladiummag.com/2019/01/28/ancient-upheavals-show-how-to-geoengineer-a-stable-climate/
Planetary engineering is the only hope.Less a commentary on climate change than a spruik for planetary engineering.
Planetary engineering is the only hope.
The author is assuming a lot. I view such tinkering as akin to the AFL playing with the rules - consequences unknown.
Is pumping thousands of tonnes of CO2 not tinkering with consequences unknown?The author is assuming a lot. I view such tinkering as akin to the AFL playing with the rules - consequences unknown.
Is pumping thousands of tonnes of CO2 not tinkering with consequences unknown?
Why wouldn't you assume business as usual. China and India are together a third of the world's population. Africa is tipped to have 4 billion people by the end of this century, with a hell of a lot of industrialisation to do. The only way is up.Yes, to an extent.
The author is assuming "business as usual" to the end of the century, whereas only China and India of significance are trending up; the rest of the world is reducing emissions. As he points out himself, current CO2 levels are low on a geological timescale.
Put it this way, a further increase of 200ppm to 600 is by far the lesser of two evils. If we have an accident and reduce it to 200 there'll be nobody left to argue about it.
Why wouldn't you assume business as usual. China and India are together a third of the world's population. Africa is tipped to have 4 billion people by the end of this century, with a hell of a lot of industrialisation to do. The only way is up.
Couldn't coal save us?Thanks to climate change nonsense we have just had a massive number of blackouts sending businesses broke and people out of jobs.
Developing Africa is business as usual - the trend of countries investing in technology and using fossil fuels to power those technologies at scale will continue.Developing Africa wouldn't be "business as usual". Pretty clear that reining in China (especially) and India will lead to a global decrease, without e.g. Germany's $64b plan to go full renewables.