This whole conversation re Australia Day -change date or even abolish, is thanks to the $Narrative Holders$
Of what is acceptable conversation and what isn’t..
And IMO is evidence that our Narrative has been hijacked. And these $Narrative Holders$ don’t have our best interests at heart
It is a conversation (introduced by the $Narrative Holders$) that seeks to undermine all the hard work-the infrastructure and the quality of life that we enjoy today. And instead slurs - “invasion day”, “privilege” etc
Ultimately and intentionally to undermine the Australian Identity for a Globalist Agenda. A mass of people with no culture identity (erased)
And is going on through out the Western World by the $Narrative Holders$
We need to take back and Own, our own Narrative
Of what is acceptable and what is not acceptable conversation
An example of a conversation not permitted by the $Narrative Holders$ would be (given our “Multicultural Utopia”) female circumcision. It’s an accepted traditional practise through out parts of Africa and the Middle East. Given our “Multicultural Utopia” should we not have a conversation on it? A pros and cons?? Benefits of ?
We won’t have that kind of conversation because it would show a fundamental clash
Of what is considered barbaric in one culture is considered normal and beneficial in another.
That kind of conversation would throw a spanner in the $Narrative Holders$ Globalist Agenda. So no female circumcision conversation (pros and cons), but invasion day, change the date, is not only acceptable but implored
Of what is acceptable conversation and what isn’t..
And IMO is evidence that our Narrative has been hijacked. And these $Narrative Holders$ don’t have our best interests at heart
It is a conversation (introduced by the $Narrative Holders$) that seeks to undermine all the hard work-the infrastructure and the quality of life that we enjoy today. And instead slurs - “invasion day”, “privilege” etc
Ultimately and intentionally to undermine the Australian Identity for a Globalist Agenda. A mass of people with no culture identity (erased)
And is going on through out the Western World by the $Narrative Holders$
We need to take back and Own, our own Narrative
Of what is acceptable and what is not acceptable conversation
An example of a conversation not permitted by the $Narrative Holders$ would be (given our “Multicultural Utopia”) female circumcision. It’s an accepted traditional practise through out parts of Africa and the Middle East. Given our “Multicultural Utopia” should we not have a conversation on it? A pros and cons?? Benefits of ?
We won’t have that kind of conversation because it would show a fundamental clash
Of what is considered barbaric in one culture is considered normal and beneficial in another.
That kind of conversation would throw a spanner in the $Narrative Holders$ Globalist Agenda. So no female circumcision conversation (pros and cons), but invasion day, change the date, is not only acceptable but implored