Carl Spackler
Club Legend
- Jul 29, 2018
- 2,406
- 5,642
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
If SportsBet were running a market I would put my money on Gunners.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not doubting it is Stratts. Completely legit choice. Would b v surprised if the club goes back on its word re layers electing captain.
Stratts team will win regardless thenCaptain of the winning side in Weds inter club game gets the gig.
The decision's taking awhile.
The decision's taking awhile.
It strikes me that Mitch was primed to be announced captain.
It would no longer surprise me if he was named anyway. Smith/ Shiels could take over until Tom is back. Especially feasible if they think he's a chance to be back in the latter part of the year.
In fairness, Suns aren’t sure they’ll still exist by Round 1 & they’ve got a nasty habit of losing Captains to trades; I’d not be surprised if they think the Captain role to be cursed & just don’t name one.Lots of clubs waiting to announce captains, Hawks, Port, Suns
Friendly, dependable and a super reliable layer - ISA Brown
Why is that a problem? The players voted, and there's no reason they wouldn't vote for Tom. Tom's time at Sydney is a bonus, not a mark against him. He played under a good system with other great players and leaders. He proved his worth in a grand final, and throughout that finals series. To top it all he then sought out our club and got himself traded here, where he's been a total team player, won two b&fs, a brownlow, the respect of the HFC, the fans and the whole competition.But only problem is that hawthorn have never appointed a player from another club as a captain
Why is that a problem? The players voted, and there's no reason they wouldn't vote for Tom. Tom's time at Sydney is a bonus, not a mark against him. He played under a good system with other great players and leaders. He proved his worth in a grand final, and throughout that finals series. To top it all he then sought out our club and got himself traded here, where he's been a total team player, won two b&fs, a brownlow, the respect of the HFC, the fans and the whole competition.
Personally I see him as eligible.
I don't see it as a valid observation at all actually. We know the players are voting for their captain, and to suggest that our coaching staff would subvert that whole process because the player chosen didn't comply with the rules of football chivalry or something is completely absurd.Maybe he is eligible - Macdaddio is simply saying that up until now Hawthorn have normally gone with a player who started their career at the hawks.
It’s not the slur you seem to think it is just an observation and a valid one. Could it change this year - maybe
No-ones saying the coaches would subvert the whole process.I don't see it as a valid observation at all actually. We know the players are voting for their captain, and to suggest that our coaching staff would subvert that whole process because the player chosen didn't comply with the rules of football chivalry or something is completely absurd.
Err... yeah okay someone replied to my post saying it was a 'problem' for Mitch that he was 'a player from another club'. But sure, you're right, that's just an observation...No-ones saying the coaches would subvert the whole process.
It’s a true obvervation that we’ve never had a Captain from another team for whatever reason. He’s not saying that it will stay like that.