Certified Legendary Thread Delusional Pearlers IV

Remove this Banner Ad

Can you nominate yourself? I got a good feeling about this year. I think the bombers are going to have a barnstorming year. There might be some stuttering in the first half of the year but "bookmark this" I reckon we'll go close to undefeated in the second half of the yea and win the flag.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Not strange. McIntosh is 192cm, 95kg, quick, tough and one of our best runners. Parish could not fulfill his role, he's too small, weak, and slow.
Click to expand...
Kamdyn McIntosh>Darcy Parish
 
D_P_S said:
Best 22 player the last 2 years for a top 4 side, not the worst claim out there.
Click to expand...
So what if the team is good, average players get into good sides all the time. Chris Masten played all bar 1 game this year for the premiers, you don't see Eagles fans proclaiming he's better. Levi Greenwood played most games for Collingwood when he was fit, is he better than Parish? Parish is a far superior player to McIntosh.
 
eth-dog said:
Kamdyn McIntosh>Darcy Parish
Click to expand...
My Boy is 3 and a bit years younger, still growing and with way more scope for improvement. His stats are also superior and thats without getting out of 2nd gear. He has more footy smarts as well. McIntosh i actually dont mind because he plays his role which is big bodied utility, filling gaps. If the tigers lost cotchin would the tigers replace him in the guts with Parish or McIntosh?
 
Bjchan13 said:
My Boy is 3 and a bit years younger, still growing and with way more scope for improvement. His stats are also superior and thats without getting out of 2nd gear. He has more footy smarts as well. McIntosh i actually dont mind because he plays his role which is big bodied utility, filling gaps. If the tigers lost cotchin would the tigers replace him in the guts with Parish or McIntosh?
Click to expand...
McIntosh is an okay player. However Parish is undoubtedly better.
 
eth-dog said:
McIntosh is an okay player. However Parish is undoubtedly better.
Click to expand...
Don't reckon it's delusional to suggest any of Mcintosh, Greenwood or Masten are at least equal to Darcy at this stage of his career. No doubt in my mind he has the potential to be far better than all of them but at the moment I feel he's stagnated and believe it's reasonable to say he's only a C grader at this stage. That being said, if we offered him in a trade for any of them I think they'd take it in a heartbeat
 
Windowlicker8 said:
Don't reckon it's delusional to suggest any of Mcintosh, Greenwood or Masten are at least equal to Darcy at this stage of his career. No doubt in my mind he has the potential to be far better than all of them but at the moment I feel he's stagnated and believe it's reasonable to say he's only a C grader at this stage. That being said, if we offered him in a trade for any of them I think they'd take it in a heartbeat
Click to expand...
Can you please explain the criteria for an A,B and C grader? What grade does it go to in the AFL?
 
Bjchan13 said:
Can you please explain the criteria for an A,B and C grader? What grade does it go to in the AFL?
Click to expand...

I'd say it's like school; a C-grader would be an 'average' AFL player, the kind of guy that's able to contribute each week but isn't a star.

A would be your AA level guys, with a small handful (think Gawn, Dangerfield, Franklin, Rance*) representing the absolute Elite.
B would be the Zaharakis type guys, they're good but not regular match-winners or best in their position.
C is average, ideally the 18-22 in your team each week.
D you'd hope are your depth players.
E are below average contributors, likely to be delisted, or unproven draftees.
F are your de-listees.
 
owen87 said:
I'd say it's like school; a C-grader would be an 'average' AFL player, the kind of guy that's able to contribute each week but isn't a star.

A would be your AA level guys, with a small handful (think Gawn, Dangerfield, Franklin, Rance*) representing the absolute Elite.
B would be the Zaharakis type guys, they're good but not regular match-winners or best in their position.
C is average, ideally the 18-22 in your team each week.
D you'd hope are your depth players.
E are below average contributors, likely to be delisted, or unproven draftees.
F are your de-listees.
Click to expand...
Ok fair enough, going off that criteria Parish is a C grader looking to push into B grade this year. He still has greenwood, McIntosh and masten covered.
 
Bjchan13 said:
Ok fair enough, going off that criteria Parish is a C grader looking to push into B grade this year. He still has greenwood, McIntosh and masten covered.
Click to expand...

I'd agree on Parish, think he's got plenty of upside given he's a natural midfielder that has been played out of position and is still young.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Jade said:
Someone turn off the swear filter.

I have a message for the herpies carrying campaignery the campaignerfaced ****** here.
Click to expand...

Awwwww, I love you too mate
 
D_P_S said:
Not footy related but my god peta
Click to expand...

PETA in general. They’re the same ones that want us to stop saying “flog a dead horse” and “kill two birds with one stone” because apparently that normalises violence against animals?
 
GUMBLETRON said:
They're quite literally trolling. Every time you react, they get what they want.
Click to expand...
They want me to say they're ******* stupid?

Well played peta.. i guess.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top