The way he justifies it is amazing. Breaking mids down into four groups, placing it what are clearky the wrong groups and calling Brayshaw a defensive mid are just some of the tactics he uses to make sure he isn't in his best 22.You state Banfield has more potential than Brayshaw. Can't take your opinion on Brayshaw seriously with crap like that.
As I said previously putting Banfield and Giro ahead of him is laughable. Actually trying to justify it is even more laughable.