Muddiemoose
Moderator
- Aug 24, 2017
- 26,461
- 95,887
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Moderator
- #1,051
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
stupid idiot lol . any chance of tweeting in the english language ?In response to a comment on Twitter about Rioli wanting to re sign at tigers before next year
Sometimes you just gotta lol View attachment 629722
None because it’s against the rules to be paid more then standard during your initial 2 year contractWho was the last draftee that didn’t sign for a standard contract ?
None because it’s against the rules to be paid more then standard during your initial 2 year contract
Apparently we are tapped out and not drafting anyone for the next 10 years money is tighhhhhhhhht
If he is a bummers supporter it’s even funnier because I’d be willing to wager their cap is pretty tight as well. Maybe not as tight as ours but I can’t see it being far off. Didn’t they have to pay a heap of players more than they were worth to keep them? And how much are they paying for stringer and Shiel at the very least?Apparently we are tapped out and not drafting anyone for the next 10 years money is tighhhhhhhhht
Give the man a cigar , deliberately to avoid rortsNone because it’s against the rules to be paid more then standard during your initial 2 year contract
Not true, however, he just must nominate the amount prior to the draft. Then clubs know what they're up against. Plus it does not guarantee a player will get to where he wants for if he's a star, a club with a higher pick would match but not place themselves at cap exposure risk.It's not well known for clubs don't want every draftee trying to extort them. AFL also do not want this happening but cannot fully drop the players right to nominate $$$, else it breaks restraint of trade laws. You can not be paid more than the standard amount if there is no prior nominated $$$.None because it’s against the rules to be paid more then standard during your initial 2 year contract
Not true, however, he just must nominate the amount prior to the draft. Then clubs know what they're up against. Plus it does not guarantee a player will get to where he wants for if he's a star, a club with a higher pick would match but not place themselves at cap exposure risk.It's not well known for clubs don't want every draftee trying to extort them. AFL also do not want this happening but cannot fully drop the players right to nominate $$$, else it breaks restraint of trade laws. You can not be paid more than the standard amount if there is no prior nominated $$$.
kid already has a moustache, should have 10 sons by the time he’s played 100 games for us
POTY...Riolimond.
Dodgy compo payments which meant they could sign the players for unders and then bank the cash, didn't you find it odd that most of their players re-signed despite already being under contract.If he is a bummers supporter it’s even funnier because I’d be willing to wager their cap is pretty tight as well. Maybe not as tight as ours but I can’t see it being far off. Didn’t they have to pay a heap of players more than they were worth to keep them? And how much are they paying for stringer and Shiel at the very least?
POTY...
Someone posted it in a group I am in saying it was MJ. I was dead tired at the time I posted it so took it as gospel. But looking at it now, I don't think it is him.
That’s worth printing out and hanging it up in the pool room
On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app
My god, imagine 2 riolis running around.
View attachment 630235
Is Maurice Jr any good or is everyone just getting stiffys because of his old man/last name? Hopefully he doesn’t end up being a Jack Silvagni type F/S.
Yeah, he certainly looks the likely type to be honest, it's not just the name, he is very lively and has some pretty damn good skills.Is Maurice Jr any good or is everyone just getting stiffys because of his old man/last name? Hopefully he doesn’t end up being a Jack Silvagni type F/S.