- Sep 6, 2015
- 28,197
- 23,338
- AFL Club
- West Coast
- Other Teams
- Pelicans, Perf Wildcats
Ken is big-time hard for Butters.
Has talked him up like the 2nd coming
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ken is big-time hard for Butters.
Has talked him up like the 2nd coming
The high pressure small forward role. Jones the classier option, McHenry the more aggressive contested option. Both came in to the AFL system as elite endurance runners. Jones also has some serious wheels. Is very quick.Have seen McHenry in a few teams
But yeah, don't know anything about them two. What roles are they looking at playing?
Ken is big-time hard for Butters.
Has talked him up like the 2nd coming
If he's not in round 1 then a round 5 debut would be nice to dump someone who's peaked earlyI'm a little concerned that Bewley was dropped this week. Surely he's not being managed.
57 points in 51 minutes of game time was pretty impressive last week.
True, but I really felt that he was one of the legitimate round 1 rooks. But, then again, his coach is Ross.If he's not in round 1 then a round 5 debut would be nice to dump someone who's peaked early
was only a late in in JLT1 after being overlooked, think he came in once Darcy was pulled out. Extra bad sign, not sure you can plan for him at all.I'm a little concerned that Bewley was dropped this week. Surely he's not being managed.
57 points in 51 minutes of game time was pretty impressive last week.
McHenry looked a chance but clearly not in calculations having missed out on both JLT games. Will play this year though id expect in a small fwd role with high level pressure.Have seen McHenry in a few teams
But yeah, don't know anything about them two. What roles are they looking at playing?
SetterfieldWe have a plethora of defensive rooks but very few forwards who are putting their hand up atm.
A lot of forwards look like they won't score well. I had rolled Rozee forward but even he looks to have question marks on his scoring ability.Setterfield
Drew
Burgess if deep down back
Balta?
Parker?
Petrucelle?
Parker seems like he has a pressure forward role lined up, but won't score that great
DT talk normally releases a rookies list before round 1Anyone done a list by positions as to the best chance rookies to play round 1?
A lot of forwards look like they won't score well. I had rolled Rozee forward but even he looks to have question marks on his scoring ability.
Good write up. I was concerned about Drew with Ollie coming back, but thought Duursma had a bit better JS than he obviously does. Thanks for the insight. It will be interesting if there are minimal rookies to take as in recent years there has been a plethora to choose from, what mattered was choosing the high scoring ones.The rookie cupboard is starting to look pretty bare.
Even some of the safer bets are looking dicey. I've got major queries on Drew as a viable option, because he is likely to go out for Wines within the first couple of rounds. There's some talk of Wines getting up for round one, so maybe that would be better than being suckered in.
Probably the only way Drew survives the Wines return is if Duursma goes out. I like Duursma but personally don't think he's totally ready for the senior team and could see Mayes replacing him if he looks overwhelmed. We have a tough start so hopefully Ken sticks with him, and he probably is one of the better coaches for giving rookies a good crack.
Ken will definitely stick with Butters, and I think he will score ok if he is allowed to drift up on the wing as well. But a bit stiff paying up for a premium mid rookie if he gets stuck playing strictly as a small forward, a role he looked primed for in JLT2.
Scott looked amazing in JLT but we know that his coach is not quite as generous as Ken. Ditto for Bewley but we didn't even really get a look at him. Cousins I put in this bracket too, could definitely see him being turfed when Sheils and Wingard come back in. You'd really want solid JS if you are paying $289k. Scrimshaw is also at Clarko's mercy.
Gibbons doesn't excite from a scoring perspective, but at this point I think we are taking anyone <200k who is named. Only thing is, he might be left out in favour of Polson, who is definitely too expensive for his role.
Depending on who you ask, Clark, Constable, Miers and Atkins are all in line for debuts, but probably only 2 of them max. Hopefully the first two from a fantasy perspective.
One of Hately or Caldwell might sneak a bench spot, but they are competing with Bonar and even then, it seems whoever is picked will drop out for Ward by round 5. Is two price rises enough?
Hore, Balta, McKay, Burgess, Petrol and Parker all look like last resorts if they are named... the types you'd usually want max one or two of in your squad, with no scoring prospects and a fair chance of becoming treestumps by round 3.
Who else is there?
Walsh: big tick, but you'll pay >200k
Setterfield: tick, but you'll pay >200k
Collins: poor role, and you'll pay 200k
Best case scenario:
- you pick those three on field + Butters,
- Duursma, Clark, Constable, Scrimshaw, and Scott are named
- throw in Petrol, Burgess, Parker and Gibbons and hope none of them die in the arse in a few weeks.
Even then you are beholden to Clarkson and the Scott brothers to keep picking their kids. Very grim stuff.
Most of my views are based off BF club board best 22 threads, where you generally find supporters are overgenerous in picking youth for round 1.
It's interesting because Ken can be very loyal to a kid if he's performing. A couple of years ago everyone was sure Houston would be dropped for Pittard after 1 or 2 rounds so hardly anyone picked him. He proceeded to kill it and be one of the best starting rookies.Good write up. I was concerned about Drew with Ollie coming back, but thought Duursma had a bit better JS than he obviously does. Thanks for the insight. It will be interesting if there are minimal rookies to take as in recent years there has been a plethora to choose from, what mattered was choosing the high scoring ones.
My summary of the rookies this year is far shorter.
It's starting to look like any rookie actually playing is a GOOD one. Don't know where we are going to get our cash from this year.Petrucelle will play round 1 for the Eagles barring something unforeseen happening, but he'll probably average 50-odd at best. His scoring in the WAFL did improve as the season went on but I can't see that entirely transferring to the AFL. Think probably around the numbers that Venables was getting last year.
Obviously McCarthy an expensive option now, but what about Darcy Moore at an even 300k?It's starting to look like any rookie actually playing is a GOOD one. Don't know where we are going to get our cash from this year.
This is a very interesting option. I think he will average a price to bump him up to around 450k......worth consideringObviously McCarthy an expensive option now, but what about Darcy Moore at an even 300k?
Popular in Supercoach at the moment as he's 239k there and people are struggling for a D4/F4 as their cash is going to midfield plus Gawndy, but his DPP could be handy with Burgess for a swing