Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: St Kilda v Western Bulldogs - 7:30PM Thu
Squiggle tips Saints at 51% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
Hit him in the head. Intential off the ball. Potential to cause injury but let's get him offChrist, ppl STILL believing Cox hit Grimes with a RAISED ELBOW/FOREARM....?
....is the Earth still flat ?
******* campaigner eyes he isbut gerry whateley watched the replay and everything was within rules
******* campaigner eyes he is
Didn't he have concussion like symptoms and not return to the ground?What I sound like Nafan ?
Piss off back to your own board.
Dusty was going back into position, the gws player decides to step in his way to harrass. Dusty 100% means to elbow him in the shoulder, hits the shoulder but the GWS player if you actually watch the vision drops his knees and the blow rides up. It was low impact and intentional so Dusty deserved a week for it. What makes me laugh is minnows in the afl and like you just are hanging to crucify the bloke and literarly make s**t up like he coldly coward punched him. The afl made up rules on the fly, rules they have not applied to anyone before.
Here is the thing, cox saw grimes, intentionally stepped into grimes line and braced with an elbow raised, actually dropped grimes to the ground, the blow was more severe then dusty but cox gets off because the medical was fine....what happened to the "potential" to cause injury ?
Double standards muppet
but gerry whateley watched the replay and everything was within rules
Here's hoping this little hiccup will put a bit of fire in his belly!dusty gonna have 39 disposals and 4 goals against the buddy's next week
Got pics?even the guy that tried to kill shedwardo at the end of the game was worse than dusty's hit
Good idea. Playing him in the goal square will also make the frees for more obvious so hopefully he actually gets them paid to him for a change...It's become pretty clear his motivation levels are high and he isn't injured he is just being completely scragged and nullifiedoff the ball illegally.
I say play him purely out of the goal square while Jack is out to get something different from him
Like they pay them for Jack?Good idea. Playing him in the goal square will also make the frees for more obvious so hopefully he actually gets them paid to him for a change...
Didn't he have concussion like symptoms and not return to the ground?
Anyone seen the written apology?
thats actually 2 weeks imoHit him in the head. Intential off the ball. Potential to cause injury but let's get him off
It's become pretty clear his motivation levels are high and he isn't injured he is just being completely scragged and nullifiedoff the ball illegally.
I say play him purely out of the goal square while Jack is out to get something different from him