Tatts
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Hawks fans whinging about other teams supporters complaining about umpires, when they get all the 50/50 callsThe countdown to the first bounce. Freo playing the freo chant via speakers to get the crowd going. Fans insisting on bad umpiring when they lose out on 50/50 calls. Unprofessional commentators. The general lack of depth in coverage again by about 50% of experts. The clash jumper issues where no clash your team has to ask the afl to wear your origional jumper. White shorts. Constant rule changes without any long term study nor imput from the 18 clubs. Casual racist fans
Tatts
What second division? What are you talking about?
You're allowed to run in any direction when playing on from over the boundary line, you just can't deviate from that line before entering the field of play.Players being called to play on when out of bounds and still run off the line
Some clubs celebrate their anniversay IN the quoted year, some the year after.
Fremantle are wearing the 25 jumper for their 25th year... 1995 to 2019. But Perth Demons are wearing a 120 patch celebrating 1899-2019 ie, they completed 120 last year and are now in their 121st season. by that logic Freo should wait for next year.
When I look up other clubs and commemorations there are plenty of examples of both.
Can't we just decide?
(I know it doesn't actually matter - thats why its here)
It's like the 100th season of the AFL being celebrated in 1996, and 150 years of Australian rules football being marked in 2008
That would be the end of rushed behinds through the goals, wouldn't it?The "touched " rule for scoring.Get rid of it and you get rid of goal line reviews.
That would be the end of rushed behinds through the goals, wouldn't it?
... which we'll need a video review system to decideNot really, only touched behinds. Rushed behinds are only counted when a spoil significantly deviates the path of the ball.
... which we'll need a video review system to decide
I think he's talking about the bullshit ones where the defender gets a millimeter of skin on the ball but otherwise does nothing to actually affect the ball. As far as I am concerned, if the ball doesn't get moved from its original trajectory the touch shouldn't matter.... which we'll need a video review system to decide
You'd only be creating a worse problem where the umpires have to decide if the ball moved off the trajectory or not. The current way is a necessary evil once you think it through. You either allow the ball to go through off hands, feet or head, or you have it off a kick only.I think he's talking about the bullshit ones where the defender gets a millimeter of skin on the ball but otherwise does nothing to actually affect the ball. As far as I am concerned, if the ball doesn't get moved from its original trajectory the touch shouldn't matter.
Partially - if removed for kicks at goal which are forced through or touched off the boot etc.You would still have rushed behinds from other events.It would get rid of these stupid arguments about whether the kick was touched based on third rate video footage.That would be the end of rushed behinds through the goals, wouldn't it?