Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Hinkley isncoaching for his job too. He won’t want too many more younguns in the side.
I’d love Liendert, Farrell Garner and Marshall in
DBJ, Bonner can go Sammy g and Motlop too.
That’s an oxymoron, because sticking with senior players will cost him his job.
But if we lose with young players in the side, Hinkley can make the rebuilding excuse.Hinkley isncoaching for his job too. He won’t want too many more younguns in the side.
I’d love Liendert, Farrell Garner and Marshall in
DBJ, Bonner can go Sammy g and Motlop too.
Definition of insanity, doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results.
more of the same and he is done.
If Marshall isn't back in this week, I'm completely done with Ken.
But if we lose with young players in the side, Hinkley can make the rebuilding excuse.
I watched them play yesterday (they won) and would do us
Ken is a DickNo gameplan is going to be compatible to the list if they are going to serve up that sort of pathetic effort. It's purely a mental thing with these chumps. Anything remotely close to an AFL standard effort from our list to actually execute basic skills and we win that game.
Richmond had four of the top five players for distance covered, all of whom covered 14.6 kilometres or more. The only player from Port who did anything close to that was Duursma with 14.9 kilometres.
Richmond had 48 more sprint efforts, ran 2.7 more kilometres and 1.4 kilometres more at high speed.
They completely smashed us in effort and their ability to close down the ground.
You pick players who consistently and wilfully skirt packs to make sure they are the ones who are on the outside for the easy outlet pass instead of crashing in when it's their turn and allowing other players to get on the outside and rack up easy possessions (which is what happened against Melbourne), it doesn't matter if you had Clarkson coaching peak Hawthorn, they would lose. And that's because there is no accountability to poor performance.
The facts are, Montgomery and Schofield came to this club and we are dealing with exactly the same s**t - so it can't be the coaching panel, because it's different. The gameplan is completely different from last year's tripe and it's exactly the same s**t - so it can't be the gameplan, because it's different. The list is quite a bit different from the list we had two years ago and it's exactly the same s**t - so it can't be the list, because that, too, is different.
The only thing that hasn't changed is the inability of the head coach to drop players when they don't put in a performance worthy of being selected the next week.
We wouldn't know if the list is good enough because Ken keeps picking the same ******* players every week hoping for a different result. It's like he decides on his best 22 at the start of the year and then sticks with it every week regardless, and will only replace players if they are injured or are a developing key forward that won't put in effort.
s**t.. that hadn't clicked that the game is Friday and sanfl was Sunday... grumble grumble..Ah five day break to the next AFL game. I thought it was weird that we had an SANFL match that was well set for our AFL game.
He has played newbies since round 1. I think sadly he feels quite safe in his job still got 2 years of a contract after this year.Hinkley isncoaching for his job too. He won’t want too many more younguns in the side.
I’d love Liendert, Farrell Garner and Marshall in
DBJ, Bonner can go Sammy g and Motlop too.
I doubt Ken will make 4 changes. Not in him.We should have a minimum of 4 changes based on the AFL and SANFL games this weekend.
Now we’ll have West Coast fans showing up saying “you will get ****** and no lube will be used”
Remember it will probably be pissing down in Perth on Friday.
Sam Gray will survive that weather prediction.
I still think dropping Marshall was the correct decision but he has to come back. Playing out of form young key forwards does not help them in the long run.
Agree we were too short last week and playing Westhoff forward is always bad. Not sure who you bring in but you couldnt keep marshall in with the way he was playing it's just not helpful for anyone There has to be minimum standardsYou're wrong on the first part unless you qualify it with that you'd have brought in another tall forward. There's really no argument about it anymore.
There isn't enough data at Port Adelaide from this century to support or refute the second part. All we know is not playing them is a great way to never develop a tall forward.
Agree we were too short last week and playing Westhoff forward is always bad. Not sure who you bring in but you couldnt keep marshall in with the way he was playing it's just not helpful for anyone There has to be minimum standards