oh u mad MAD
Will Dangerfield appeal his 2 weeks?
- Thread starter nut
- Start date
- Tagged users None
What’s got me riled up is Hocking mentioning ‘potential to cause injury’ over Dusty despite that literally never coming up.
De Boer was doubling over from the first hit, Dangerfield isn’t looking at him and throws another elbow, barely missing his head. If we combine ‘potential to cause injury’ and ‘the head is sacrosanct’ that should be weeks.
Sttew
Brownlow Medallist
Better still, whenever Brereton is commentating on a Geelong game Foxtel should put a Bias meter in the bottom right corner of the screen so we can temper whatever he says
- Mar 28, 2018
- 10,491
- 8,454
- AFL Club
- GWS
At the end if the day Dusty's elbow was downgraded to 1 week because of Kennedy's tesimony he felt no pain from the impact. It hinged on the strength of the impact.
There really Is no comparison. Iactualkythiught Dangerfield get off in the initial contact. De Bier was holding him moments before. I thiught hemightbefined fir the second.
In the end it was the reversed but I cant see a suspension in it.
Already, the MRO/media is replacing facts.
I don't mind if Dangerfield plays (it's honestly not going to change the result) - but to say he did NOT make contact with the second swing is patently false.
Sttew
Brownlow Medallist
English please
Righto glancing his head, same point, didn’t do any damage but had potential so should’ve got weeks.
Sttew
Brownlow Medallist
So many posters are taking it so personal that Danger wasn't suspended. WTF is the world coming to?
Blindling swinging the arm behind you is a lotto if you connect, either its nothing or weeks!
Doesn’t Dusty getting suspended kinda refute that argument?
- Mar 16, 2002
- 21,706
- 13,425
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Other Teams
- Richmond
- Thread starter
- #38
Both had the potential to cause serious injury ... both didn’t cause serious injury.
- Mar 28, 2018
- 10,491
- 8,454
- AFL Club
- GWS
- Mar 16, 2002
- 21,706
- 13,425
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Other Teams
- Richmond
- Thread starter
- #40
IDGAF that Dangerfield didn’t get weeks. But the rules are the rules.... that’s the F.....ing point.
The AFL inconsistencies are ruining the game.
- Mar 16, 2002
- 21,706
- 13,425
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Other Teams
- Richmond
- Thread starter
- #41
It hinged on the “potential to cause injury” ... it was deemed low impact so where the f#^^k is the potential to cause serious injury with “low impact” ?????????
Sttew
Brownlow Medallist
That'd be rightGlad he's playing so Rough can run through him one more time
EFA
Shattering news for Bremerton
Just remember that BigFooty doesn't resemble the real world.
There's plenty of rational people fed up that this nonsense was even brought to light.
There's only a handful of elite players left in this game, no idea why people want them out for crap like that.
- Mar 2, 2015
- 19,063
- 34,271
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
Brereton said Danger could be in trouble for an off-the-ball altercation with de Boer
He was right, wasn't he?
1st punch:
Patrick Dangerfield has been charged with Striking Matt de Boer.
The incident was assessed as Intentional Conduct with Low Impact and Body Contact.
In summary he can accept a $2000 sanction with an early plea.
2nd punch:
Contact between Patrick Dangerfield and Matt De Boer was assessed. Dangerfield is being held. He swings his arm back in the direction of De Boer to break the hold. De Boer is bent over from an earlier strike and minimal contact appears to be made by Dangerfield. It was the view of the MRO that the force was insufficient to constitute a charge. No further action was taken.
Brereton's job as commentator is to let us viewers know what happens during the game. In particular, the things which we can't see and which occur outside the field of view of the cameras. I'd say he did his job well. Better than those unprofessional arsewipes who see something untoward but choose not to say anything because they wish to stay matey with the players or the club in question.
LOL @ Geelong flogs who think Brereton was trying to do his old club a favour and get Danger suspended. Really?
gingernuts
binlicker
Brereton a commentator? I think not.end of day Dangerfield will be there Monday so move on.Brereton said Danger could be in trouble for an off-the-ball altercation with de Boer
He was right, wasn't he?
1st punch:
Patrick Dangerfield has been charged with Striking Matt de Boer.
The incident was assessed as Intentional Conduct with Low Impact and Body Contact.
In summary he can accept a $2000 sanction with an early plea.
2nd punch:
Contact between Patrick Dangerfield and Matt De Boer was assessed. Dangerfield is being held. He swings his arm back in the direction of De Boer to break the hold. De Boer is bent over from an earlier strike and minimal contact appears to be made by Dangerfield. It was the view of the MRO that the force was insufficient to constitute a charge. No further action was taken.
Brereton's job as commentator is to let us viewers know what happens during the game. In particular, the things which we can't see and which occur outside the field of view of the cameras. I'd say he did his job well. Better than those unprofessional arsewipes who see something untoward but choose not to say anything because they wish to stay matey with the players or the club in question.
LOL @ Geelong flogs who think Brereton was trying to do his old club a favour and get Danger suspended. Really?
captain blood 17
El Jefe
- Dec 9, 2006
- 50,287
- 111,880
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Other Teams
- Aston Villa Traralgon Football Club
- Feb 21, 2006
- 20,725
- 19,564
- AFL Club
- Melbourne
- Other Teams
- Turtles, NYJets, Celtics, Tottenham
Similar threads
- Poll
