FishingRick04
Brownlow Medallist
I wonder if there was the old fashioned picture of McGovern put up in the rooms with a target and highlight how we are his bitch and time to change.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What on earth was Jetta doing? As Duursma works off of him, he is jogging along leisurely ball watching! Totally smashed by a 5-game, first-year player!Here's some highlights from the 1st Quarter:
Riley Bonner
Bonner the ball on the run because he's in motion in support of the midfield, delivers the ball to Ryder and most importantly keeps running to put pressure up the field and provide support to the forward line. This is the reason why Riley Bonner is in the team. This was a feature of all the players during the game - the constant run forward in support.
Sam Powell-Pepper
Yeo gets crunched by Powell-Pepper from his blind side near goal, allowing Boak to pounce on the resulting crumb. This was due to Powell-Pepper leaving his man and going after a player who fumbled the ball (Yeo) instead of waiting for him to recover and trying to get the ball back by covering the outlet or simply waiting on the outside for an easy possession, which creates a scoring opportunity for Boak.
Sam Gray
Notice the work rate of Gray in this passage. Sees that he's not going to be part of the play if he stays where he was trying to make the ground wider in case Lycett decided to switch, and so steams in to get near the fall of the ball and then put pressure on not one but two Eagles defenders which ends up in an intercept mark to Robbie Gray.
Todd Marshall
Just want to highlight this. This is what Todd Marshall brings to the side when he's on his game - elite defensive pressure. He forced at least two or three changes of direction in this passage of play simply because he was chasing and harassing opponents. It is this sort of pressure that creates the implied pressure later in the game.
Zak Butters
RussellEbertHandball talks about UFH - Useless ******* Handballs. Well, this is a case of EFH - Effective ******* Handballs. Instead of kicking the ball into the line of defenders that are setup behind the play, Butters handballs to Ebert who handballs on to Powell-Pepper running in support. Notice that Howard is also running forward in this passage of play next to Powell-Pepper. The handball from Butters meant that Powell-Pepper's resulting kick could be chipped over to a waiting Duursma - who only started to work off of Jetta once he knew we had the ball, because he trusted his teammates to do the right thing. Defending is important, but the purpose is to get the ball back. Once you've got the ball back, it's time to run and spread.
Dougal Howard
This play shows you why he can be an All Australian defender if he applies himself. One handed trap and gather of the ball on the run and a calm delivery of the ball. The defensive version of Marshall.
And don't ya love it ..What on earth was Jetta doing? As Duursma works off of him, he is jogging along leisurely ball watching! Totally smashed by a 5-game, first-year player!
Following on from REH's post about Duursma's goal. In the article/video it shows Gaff and Jetta not giving Duursma the respect.
David King highlights vision of West Coast’s poor defensive running hinting at a premiership hangover
https://www.foxsports.com.au/afl/da...r/news-story/6cdc29fbf000c273d90f15ab3c141fdb
He was fantastic against WC. I also liked his last 3 qtrs against Richmond.What am I missing about Dougal?
Just saw he was named in the AFL Team of the Week. I'll grant that he was much better this week, but it felt like he'd gone from a D- to maybe a C+. There were contests he didn't kill, fumbles he should have taken cleanly, targets he should have hit ...
Am I just marking him too harshly?
Did lol at Gaff having a premiership hangover.Following on from REH's post about Duursma's goal. In the article/video it shows Gaff and Jetta not giving Duursma the respect.
David King highlights vision of West Coast’s poor defensive running hinting at a premiership hangover
https://www.foxsports.com.au/afl/da...r/news-story/6cdc29fbf000c273d90f15ab3c141fdb
Apologies if this has been commented on extensively, but I gotta say:
The tactic to mongrel the ball i50 forward, deliberately, was extremely well-planned and executed. Ollie Wines let slip post-game it was a Coaching plan to take out WCE's intercept-marking defenders, especially McGovern (will Wines cop any flak for that?). Apparently, your forwards were told to get in front in the F50 and expect the ball to be coming in low, maybe even grubbed, which they executed really well. Chaos ball, coming in low, and your forwards exploited it.
Several footy shows commented on the tactic and even Nathan Buckley said on radio he was going to have a good look at that game. Hinkley & assistants might have worked out a tactic to beat WCE!
Congrats on strong and tactically astute win. VERY hard to beat the Eagles at home.
Maybe learn to take a compliment?You're looking at one part of the ground, when it was an all over ground performance.
and, Crows supporter or not, I meant it.Congrats on strong and tactically astute win.
He took the compliment. He just warned that ONLY chaos-balling wouldn't have been enough.Maybe learn to take a compliment?
Yes, I did focus on that particular tactic. Yes, it was one of many.
I did say:
and, Crows supporter or not, I meant it.
Maybe learn to take a compliment?
Yes, I did focus on that particular tactic. Yes, it was one of many.
I did say:
and, Crows supporter or not, I meant it.
They arent giving Duursma enough credit.Following on from REH's post about Duursma's goal. In the article/video it shows Gaff and Jetta not giving Duursma the respect.
David King highlights vision of West Coast’s poor defensive running hinting at a premiership hangover
https://www.foxsports.com.au/afl/da...r/news-story/6cdc29fbf000c273d90f15ab3c141fdb
Fair point .He took the compliment. He just warned that ONLY chaos-balling wouldn't have been enough.
No 'S' required on the end of that.It was more a comment on the media and others focusing on one particular aspect as if it was luck or the Eagles having an off day. Even in Ebert's interview people were talking about 'dirty ball' as if this was some new tactic going into the forward line, when all it is is just creating contested situations from which the team could apply pressure. Dirty possession (halving the contest and then using the small forwards/midfielders to crumb) as opposed to clean possession (kicking lace out to the forwards).
Pretty much exactly what we didn't do against Richmond the week before because our key forward couldn't get to a contest in the last quarter.
But the thing was - when the forwards were in space, it wasn't like we weren't targeting them. So it was actually a combination of clean and dirty ball.
OK, I see.It was more a comment on the media and others focusing on one particular aspect as if it was luck or the Eagles having an off day.
A lot was involved, but essentially you are correct. The "dirty-ball" tactic was the spine of it. It threw WC off from the opening bounce, and they never recovered. However it did call for the entire squad to buy into it, and to implement it it effectively, especially after our rusted-on tactic of "Kick it high to Dixon" that we have failed at for the last two years!OK, I see.
It really got my attention because I thought it was unusual/clever, a terrific plan, well-executed.
Smart enough and effective enough to get the attention of the media and Buckley, publicly. I'll bet other Coaches are scrutinising that game too.
I think Lycett was on a different page.Lol, I remember that. Let's take a selfie to cheer up Gaffy, his fist must really be hurting after Andy Brayshaw headbutted it.
Brad Sheppard was given the job on Robbie Gray and whilst he did a good job, this is a classic case of stats watching and worrying about Robbie not getting a goal recorded on him. Look how he is worried so much about Robbie rather than going and putting pressure on Duursma.
Given our past results against WCE and the sameness of our losses, I highly doubt it was Hinkley.A lot was involved, but essentially you are correct. The "dirty-ball" tactic was the spine of it. It threw WC off from the opening bounce, and they never recovered. However it did call for the entire squad to buy into it, and to implement it it effectively, especially after our rusted-on tactic of "Kick it high to Dixon" that we have failed at for the last two years!
I would love to know who was the architect of this plan! If it was Hinkley, then wow, kudos to him, and he would have redeemed himself a bit. But good chance it came from Schofield, Montgomery, or even Bassett. Possibly input from Lycett, with insider knowledge of any weaknesses they had or feared.
Dont know how successful it will be if another team tries it though, they will be training for this eventuality, and will be better prepared in the future.