Anyway, i will let you be, i think you had enough shaming for one night sorry m8 ..
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: St Kilda v Western Bulldogs - 7:30PM Thu
Squiggle tips Saints at 51% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
I did but they rejected mine they accepted your definition of vacuum so that everyone can learn what a vacuum truly means.
I'm not delusional enough to believe I can correct a 190 year old institution of the English language, much less consciously interact with a lump of quartz.
I never asked anyone to believe me, i said not to trust me didn't i?
I didn't need your advice champ. A couple of your posts was all it took.
Try to find some type of productive vocation in life. This is, frankly, just sad.
Wasn't an advice, just pointed out your ridiculous attempt at science.
take it like a man.
Best you deal with getting a grasp the English language first, before you waffle on about science.
Yes yes grammar etc, anything but science
Has Ports flogging short circuited your neural networks completely tonight?
nah, it resulted in vacuum rofl....
Indeed.
nothingness LOL!
The evidence supports it.
Well enjoy an enlightened discussion with THS.I hope you two can help each other in the process.
He's more genuine than you, despite the religious delusions.
Sanity.Of course they do. A claim is being made about a creator. Science makes no such claim.
He says no such thing.
He says no such thing.
Dawkins makes absolutely no scientific explanation of aliens. This is just plain dishonesty or at best misinterpretation from you.
Dawkin's has no answer. Aliens or anything else. He's said that clearly.
BruceFromBalnarring https://www.standard.net.au/story/6...ail&utm_term=0_8fc75d76a0-375fcd6b4f-66122521 talk me thru this - what is the potential penalty for the turds running this case - defending the indefensible
Yes and fortunately a Justice of the Supreme Court has called the bad dogs and the vermin that defend them out for their callous and unethical behaviourBut, but, but the church is deeply remorseful over its inaction and willing to do whatever it takes to remedy the survivors.
What a pack of absolute campaigners.
BruceFromBalnarring https://www.standard.net.au/story/6...ail&utm_term=0_8fc75d76a0-375fcd6b4f-66122521 talk me thru this - what is the potential penalty for the turds running this case - defending the indefensible
The stupid campaigners have denied it McDonald J has asked them to show cause why they should not be dealt with under a breach of the civil administration procedures - whatever that is - these campaigners are arrogant beyond beliefThe article isn't clear on what (I imagine) the Defence document said. You can "admit" an allegation, "not admit" an allegation, or "deny" an allegation. Most Defendant solicitors in my experience will "not admit" those aspects of a Statement of Claim that point to their culpability. That is the right of any Respondent to a civil suit. Now if they've "denied" it, that's a different matter. And they're dumb. But if they've simply "not admitted" it, that's pretty standard practice.
The stupid campaigners have denied it McDonald J has asked them to show cause why they should not be dealt with under a breach of the civil administration procedures - whatever that is - these campaigners are arrogant beyond belief
Yes - Mortlake - what penalty do they face as the Judge was mega pissed basically said they did not act in good faithIt surprises me that they would deny. Not admit is a reasonable tactic (and forgive my blunt language, I don't intend to be insensitive, I'm just trying to reconcile the "why") in circumstances where the records are inconclusive and the main players are dead, but a denial is to say in a positive sense something wasn't known, as opposed to saying "you prove that it was known". They'd want to be able to provide evidence, which would be a strange thing after the Royal Commission.
We're talking about Mortlake, not Edenhope, right?
Yes - Mortlake - what penalty do they face as the Judge was mega pissed basically said they did not act in good faith