Society/Culture Drag queens reading to kids in libraries

[CM86]

Are these drag queens?

What's the difference?

Well I don’t think Edna Everidge is a highly sexualised interpretation of femininity, but I don’t want to kink shame you.

So you find the examples you've given... to be a highly sexualised interpretation of femininity?... I hope I'm not kink shaming you...

 

[Mike Smyth]

Woops.

https://thefederalist.com/2019/03/1...-child-molester-reading-trans-books-children/

 

[CM86]

Woops.

https://thefederalist.com/2019/03/1...-child-molester-reading-trans-books-children/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alberto_Garza

Pretty heavily anti-jew... your site.
Do you stand by it?

 

[its free real estate]

So you find the examples you've given... to be a highly sexualised interpretation of femininity?... I hope I'm not kink shaming you...

Which examples have I given?

 

[Mike Smyth]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alberto_Garza

Pretty heavily anti-jew... your site.
Do you stand by it?

The sexualization of children is now in full swing. You lefties and Islam really are quite comfortable bedfellows. Sick bastards.

What do Colorado, New York and California all have in common?

"In Colorado, what that means is legislators drafting a mandate for “comprehensive sex ed” curriculum for all children in public schools ages 4-12. Four. Age four. What could four-year-olds be learning under this pending law? Well, the bill would mandate that children learn about “the relational or sexual experiences of lesbian, gay, bisexual or transgender individuals,” and “gender, gender expression, gender identity” — i.e., transgenderism. California and New York already have instituted such curricula in their public schools."

 

[CM86]

Which examples have I given?

You made the thread and provided a ton of links... Check the OP....

 

[CM86]

The sexualization of children is now in full swing. You lefties and Islam really are quite comfortable bedfellows. Sick bastards.

What do Colorado, New York and California all have in common?

"In Colorado, what that means is legislators drafting a mandate for “comprehensive sex ed” curriculum for all children in public schools ages 4-12. Four. Age four. What could four-year-olds be learning under this pending law? Well, the bill would mandate that children learn about “the relational or sexual experiences of lesbian, gay, bisexual or transgender individuals,” and “gender, gender expression, gender identity” — i.e., transgenderism. California and New York already have instituted such curricula in their public schools."

So you don't care if your anti-Semite site is total bullshit, you'll just forge ahead with more bullshit?...

 

[its free real estate]

You made the thread and provided a ton of links... Check the OP....

What in the links is highly sexualised? They are mostly news items.

 

[CM86]

What in the links is highly sexualised? They are mostly news items.

What part of my first post was 'highly sexualised'?

 

[its free real estate]

What part of my first post was 'highly sexualised'?

None. You cited Mrs Doubtfire, among others, as examples of a drag queen. But this fictional character does not meet the criteria for a drag queen.

 

[Scallop Industry Thug]

The sexualization of children is now in full swing. You lefties and Islam really are quite comfortable bedfellows. Sick bastards.

Mike can you let the thread know when you’ve actually researched what that education means in practical application?




On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app

 

[CM86]

None. You cited Mrs Doubtfire, among others, as examples of drag queens. But this fictional character does not meet the criteria for a drag queen.

Yes... You asked me "Are these drag queens".
I asked you what the difference is... and you replied "Well I don’t think Edna Everidge is a highly sexualised interpretation of femininity, but I don’t want to kink shame you."

So I'm asking you what you're examples were that you considered "highly sexualised" interpretations of femininity? And I'm also apologising for kink shaming you.


I'll attach the conversion, in case you're worried you've made a mistake.

Are these drag queens?

What's the difference?

Well I don’t think Edna Everidge is a highly sexualised interpretation of femininity, but I don’t want to kink shame you.

 

[CM86]

this fictional character does not meet the criteria for a drag queen.

Drag queens are performance artists, almost always male, who dress in women's clothing and often act with exaggerated femininity and in feminine gender roles with a primarily entertaining purpose. They often exaggerate make-up such as eyelashes for dramatic, comedic or satirical effect. Drag queens are closely associated with gay men and gay culture, but can be of any sexual orientation or gender identity. They vary widely by class, culture, and dedication, from professionals who star in films to people who try drag very occasionally.​

​

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drag_queen

 

[its free real estate]

So I'm asking you what you're examples were that you considered "highly sexualised" interpretations of femininity?

Umm no, read again:

So you find the examples you've given... to be a highly sexualised interpretation of femininity?

This was a leading question. What examples did I give?

We’ve already established you’re stupid, but I had assumed you’d take more care with your words.

Once again you try to set a trap you end up ensnaring yourself in.

 

[its free real estate]

Drag queens are performance artists, almost always male, who dress in women's clothing and often act with exaggerated femininity and in feminine gender roles with a primarily entertaining purpose. They often exaggerate make-up such as eyelashes for dramatic, comedic or satirical effect. Drag queens are closely associated with gay men and gay culture, but can be of any sexual orientation or gender identity. They vary widely by class, culture, and dedication, from professionals who star in films to people who try drag very occasionally.​

​

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drag_queen

Thank you Malifice

 

[CM86]

Umm no, read again:


This was a leading question.

We’ve already established you’re stupid, but I had assumed you’d take more care with your words.

Once again you try to set a trap you end up ensnaring yourself in.

Thank you Malifice

Thanks for your evidence of pure genius.
You've made your point clear and concise, using evidence and diagrams.

It would be embarrassing if you'd lead the charge and made a thread without having any idea of what you're talking about.
Luckily you're very clever, and an alpha. Kudos.

Impressive that you simultaneously claim that you've stated your definition of a Drag queen, while insisting you've never made any such statement.

Great thread! It's created fear in your closest friends.

 

[its free real estate]

Thanks for your evidence of pure genius.
You've made your point clear and concise, using evidence and diagrams.

It would be embarrassing if you'd lead the charge and made a thread without having any idea of what you're talking about.
Luckily you're very clever, and an alpha. Kudos.

Impressive that you simultaneously claim that you've stated your definition of a Drag queen, while insisting you've never made any such statement.

Great thread! It's created fear in your closest friends.

Nonsense.

 

[CM86]

Nonsense.

Absolutely.

Can you now state how your drag queens are different to the drag queens I posted?

 

[its free real estate]

Absolutely.

Can you now state how your drag queens are different to the drag queens I posted?

I’m not going to get into ontological discussions at this hour.

 

[Mike Smyth]

Mike can you let the thread know when you’ve actually researched what that education means in practical application?




On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app

Let me guess. You can't comment until you know the full context? Facts and logic can be deceiving.

 

[Scallop Industry Thug]

Let me guess. You can't comment until you know the full context? Facts and logic can be deceiving.

Do you want to be outraged, or do you want to know the facts?


On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app

 

[CM86]

I’m not going to get into ontological discussions at this hour.

Haaaaaa haha. To quote your greatest fan...

Nonsense.

 

[Scallop Industry Thug]

Lol Bronwyn Bishop has burped up labor funding Marxist drag queens.




On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app

 

[EasternTiger]

Joe Rogan had a drag queen on the podcast yesterday. It was disturbing because he didn't ham it up for the show, and spoke like a regular bloke. My brain was trying to process 'he looks like a woman but he talks like a man.'

Alex Jones was right. JR is a left wing shill trying to co-opt our minds.

Confirmed new world order puppet.

 

[Roobs321]

I don't really understand the problem. Drag queens are performance artists (usually gay men). OP seems to have them confused with transvestites. I understand some drag queens can perform in a sexualised manner, but I imagine there are a diverse range of drag queen acts, some perfectly suitable to reading to kids in libraries, some thoroughly unsuitable. An earlier reference to clowns was made, and if clowns are accepted, why not drag queens. They perform a similar role, probably give a good laugh.