Snake_Baker
The one true King of the North
- Apr 24, 2013
- 81,024
- 153,169
- AFL Club
- North Melbourne
- Other Teams
- Essendon Lawn Bowls Club
- Banned
- #1
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I certainly think that a country with one of the more fragile ecosystems should be increasing its human population at the rate of 300,000 people per year.
3 posts to blame the migrants.
Top work.
Poster is on my ignore list, had a quick check, no surprise, how is he still posting here is beyond me.
Lol or blaming the bipartisan approach to immigration.3 posts to blame the migrants.
Top work.
Must be white supremacy though.
So you don't see any correlation between rapidly increasing Australia's population and the thread topic?Going by the poster in questions overt, repeated and clear support for ethnic nationalism, that's actually extremely likely.
So you don't see any correlation between rapidly increasing Australia's population and the thread topic?
The image talks about Australia -- so yeah, fewer people in Australia does reduce pollution and all that other fun stuff.No. How does global mass extinction and global warming etc slow down if we have 300,000 less migrants here than overseas?
Those people dont magically cease to exist, eat, consume and pollute just because they're overseas, or on the other side of a dotted line drawn on a map.
The image talks about Australia -- so yeah, fewer people in Australia does reduce pollution and all that other fun stuff.
The image talks about Australia -- so yeah, fewer people in Australia does reduce pollution and all that other fun stuff.
The exact same argument as above is made by people in favour of coal fired power generation in Australia, and those who oppose a carbon tax.No. How does global mass extinction and global warming etc slow down if we have 300,000 less migrants here than overseas?
Those people dont magically cease to exist, eat, consume and pollute just because they're overseas, or on the other side of a dotted line drawn on a map.
This is absolute nonsense.Developed nations also have lower birth rates so it's also a win win for future generations of the planet.
The exact same argument as above is made by people in favour of coal fired power generation in Australia, and those who oppose a carbon tax.
This is absolute nonsense.
Yes, it does. A number of studies show that people’s individual consumption levels rise as they move to higher consumption countries. A person moving from Denmark would consume more energy and resources here than in Denmark.Moving 300,000 people from overseas to Australia doesn't change the rate at which those 300k people pollute or consume.
No, it doesn’t. If Australia stopped using coal tomorrow, it would negligible impact on overall emissions.30 million people stopping using coal and taking active measures to reduce their carbon footprint does have an impact on the rate of global warming.
Name one country that has seen its population decline because of outward emigration.Fertility rates of the world:
No it's not.
Even taking into account the higher infant mortality rate in developing nations (which brings overall numbers down in developing nations, along with reducing the median age), in developed nations people (especially women) are educated, have easy access to contraception, expected to work, and trend towards fewer children and having them later in life.
What Total Power and Malifice show is the average liberal... is empty headed.
Why would I respond to erroneous accusations from someone no one on this board respects?I see you not only didn't even bother to attempt to challenge my assertion you're an ethnic nationalist, and instead simply denounced liberalism.
You're not even trying to hide it anymore.
So do immigrants change their behaviour when they emigrate to Australia or not?
Why would I respond to erroneous accusations from someone no one on this board respects?
We've been over this: do you think the Uyghurs should have a homeland? Or should they remain subject to whims of the Han Chinese majority?So for the record, repudiate ethnic nationalism for me.