Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Suggestion that the Crows paid him before he made footy his priority, under the counter payment? under the counter agreement?
Doedee playes smaller so talia and keath are the 2 key backs with doedee the intercept. Hartigan will be 1st drop so to speak for a key defensive post shpuld talia or keath be injured or unavailableI think I'll be answering my own question, but Crows supporters, when Doedee comes back next year, is Hartigan the one to drop out?
Only asking as Keath and Doedee seem to play the same '3rd tall, intercept marking' role, rather than a traditional key-defensive position.
Can they both play in the same backline? Or will you then be too tall?
The only worry for the Crows is that his next contract will be his only big pay day. Has been on minimum until now and has maybe 4 years to get out with some decent savings.
Thats why in my eyes he, along with Greenwood, are susceptible to leaving for a bigger pay check.
Plus the Crows suck at player retention.
Not too sure.Any idea who manages them?
No, was above board & on the books.Suggestion that the Crows paid him before he made footy his priority, under the counter payment? under the counter agreement?
+ Milera as it's a back 7 including the bench.Going nowhere.
2020 backline group will be pretty formidable if you ask me,
Laird / Talia / Brown
Smith / Keath / Doedee
Hartigan probably drops out as Keath & Doedee flexible to play both roles... but may also look to push either further up the ground. Doedee in the midfield or Keath up forward/swingman.I think I'll be answering my own question, but Crows supporters, when Doedee comes back next year, is Hartigan the one to drop out?
Only asking as Keath and Doedee seem to play the same '3rd tall, intercept marking' role, rather than a traditional key-defensive position.
Can they both play in the same backline? Or will you then be too tall?
We have a few older players coming out of contract who we would likely delist rather than losing Keath or Greenwood.The only worry for the Crows is that his next contract will be his only big pay day. Has been on minimum until now and has maybe 4 years to get out with some decent savings.
Thats why in my eyes he, along with Greenwood, are susceptible to leaving for a bigger pay check.
Plus the Crows suck at player retention.
Suggestion that the Crows paid him before he made footy his priority, under the counter payment? under the counter agreement?
Thats not so much the issue. We have our payment matrix that we dont deviate from. The crazy money teams like North, GC etc can throw around is ridiculous, and we dont have a heap of cap left.We have a few older players coming out of contract who we would likely delist rather than losing Keath or Greenwood.
Our payments methodology has changed a little under Reid.Thats not so much the issue. We have our payment matrix that we dont deviate from. The crazy money teams like North, GC etc can throw around is ridiculous, and we dont have a heap of cap left.
I wish we didn’t have crazy money to throw around. Having to keep front ending contracts to meet the min cap after missing the big fish is only acceptable for like 2-3 years. Getting annoying nowThats not so much the issue. We have our payment matrix that we dont deviate from. The crazy money teams like North, GC etc can throw around is ridiculous, and we dont have a heap of cap left.
Pretty sure he was legitimately on our rookie list whilst still having last crack at his cricket career. He and Greenwood were on much bigger money than the ordinary rookie wage but the extra payments were in the cap.
I wish we didn’t have crazy money to throw around. Having to keep front ending contracts to meet the min cap after missing the big fish is only acceptable for like 2-3 years. Getting annoying now
Money aside I think he's done 'well enough' in cricket to justify it. Member of a winning world cup squad (which definitely has more clout than being on a premiership list if you don't play in a final), five wickets in the opening game, and a few pretty memorable Ashes moments.I often wonder how good a footballer Mitch Marsh could have been. Love him or hate him, he'd be a lot poorer ($s) if he went down the AFL route.
Money aside I think he's done 'well enough' in cricket to justify it. Member of a winning world cup squad (which definitely has more clout than being on a premiership list if you don't play in a final), five wickets in the opening game, and a few pretty memorable Ashes moments.