- Thread starter
- #51
AFL doesn't own state league clubs though. The likes of Norwood, Glenelg etc would form any new league.How do they break away? the AFL owns all 18 teams.
It'd never be the top comp, but an alternative
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFL doesn't own state league clubs though. The likes of Norwood, Glenelg etc would form any new league.How do they break away? the AFL owns all 18 teams.
Fair enough, guess anything is possible but how many people actually want it?
I'd prefer to see the state that invented the game have its own competition. 12 teams, play each other twice, home and away.
Good players from lesser stats can come and play in that comp.
Really? That's the excuse youre running with to keep North in? We were here 1st?
Im sure theres other reasons. Better ones. Yeah? No?
I'm not talking rugby league/world series cricket style, but rather similar to the Indian premier league soccer.
There's quite a few clubs at state level that are fed up with the way the AFL has treated them, so could we see them break away and form their own national league, filled with mainly the "coulda been" 22+ yr olds, with a smattering of older types who've retired?
No I got it. Just thought he could of run with something better.You missed the irony.
They were describing the old VFL comp (bring back the good ol’ days)
There has been some whispers about a new league starting up, mostly surrounding Amazon starting it. Whether there's any truth to it or not is another thing.
With modern marketing, management, media etc, would be a massive success.
You don't need people to give a damn, you just need people watching and talking.How many people give a **** about state league clubs?
What is "Indian premier league soccer"?
You don't need people to give a damn, you just need people watching and talking.
The ipl soccer is effectively a retirement league. Unsanctioned by for a, but enough money to pay the older stars
Not a chance. Sadly the AFL has swamped (and in some cases it seems deliberately destroyed) every other level of footy to the point where they only stay afloat so long as the AFL decides. Any second-tier club trying to do that would be out of business within a few months, at best.I'm not talking rugby league/world series cricket style, but rather similar to the Indian premier league soccer.
There's quite a few clubs at state level that are fed up with the way the AFL has treated them, so could we see them break away and form their own national league, filled with mainly the "coulda been" 22+ yr olds, with a smattering of older types who've retired?
No, the AFL owns every club.I'm not talking rugby league/world series cricket style, but rather similar to the Indian premier league soccer.
There's quite a few clubs at state level that are fed up with the way the AFL has treated them, so could we see them break away and form their own national league, filled with mainly the "coulda been" 22+ yr olds, with a smattering of older types who've retired?
Things don’t necessarily come about because people want them. Sometimes things come about as solutions to problems. Here’s a bunch of structural problems that many AFL supporters complain about, that a new super comp could very easily address:
- MCG/Victoria hosting the Grand Final every year.
- Inequity of the draw. Ideally every team would play every other team twice: once home, once away.
- Dominance of the competition by Victoria. Resultant inequity of the Victorian teams not having to travel as much.
- No team in Tasmania.
Further, a super league could cut down on costs by having fewer teams. And broadcasting is very accessible these days.
No, the AFL owns every club.
You've hit the beef points of every non vic supporter, the issue to overcome for such a league would be taking interest from the largest footy market in the country and that's Vic. The population of vic outnumbers all other footy states combined including NT by over a million people. These points above will not largely entice vic supporters to move over.
All of these previously thought of ideas like pulling clubs like Coll & Ess to join a rebel league is the stuff of fairy tales really.
Another proposal:
There is enough market outside Vic to garner a league if someone like a Forrest were to gladly siphon funds for the cause.
Invite all the non vic clubs from the now AFL and call it once again the VFL (even though currently one and the same league), bring back Fitzroy (if the funding is provided) and even a South Melbourne. These current non vic clubs can be the base of this "super" rebel league.
The "super" league will have access to all of the stadiums outside Vic................... in theory this is actually workable. Just requires the funding.
This would address all of the issues above as well as give Broadcasters an opposition for the current monopoly by HQ. Could actually drive the market up for tv rights.
I'd imagine most players would be willing to back it so long as they don't lose out financially or any other way
..................Just takes someone with a big enough lettuce farm to pull it off.