Its not the coach
Cancelled
- Apr 16, 2019
- 1,289
- 890
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Banned
- #1,251
Surely even the Jenkins and Tex bagger haters are going to be away this week. Good stuff
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Brodie Grundy and the Pies 1st rounder for ROB? Tell em they’re dreaming
You've been a warrior Sauce, but your time is up.
ROB THE MATCH WINNER
https://www.aflcoaches.com.au/awards/the-aflca-champion-player-of-the-year-award/leaderboardNah, Brad sucks balls defensively. It's just a fact
Which makes me ask why he can't play that way on a consistent basis from week to week - or even for just 4 quarters. If he showed the same intensity he had in the last 8 minutes for the full 4 quarters he would be on top of the Coleman.Tex - 15 possessions 6 marks 3 I50, 8 score involvements, 2 goals.
Grotto: against good opposition
HS: goal and big marks at critical times in the last quarter.
That. Is. All.
Mate, how many times can you post coaches votes? I've pulled out plenty of examples where B Crouch has failed to chase. His offensive game is building nicely, but if you think his defensive game is up to scratch then you're a poor judge.https://www.aflcoaches.com.au/awards/the-aflca-champion-player-of-the-year-award/leaderboard
LEADERBOARD
VOTES PLAYER CLUB
63 Tim Kelly GEEL
52 Patrick Cripps CARL
49 Brodie Grundy COLL
47 Travis Boak PORT
46 Ben Cunnington NMFC'
45 Nat Fyfe FRE
44 Marcus Bontempelli WB
44 Lachlan Neale BL
44 Luke Shuey WCE
42 Scott Pendlebury COLL
39 Patrick Dangerfield GEEL
38 Stephen Coniglio GWS
38 Max Gawn MELB
38 Elliot Yeo WCE
37 Gary Ablett GEEL
36 Jeremy Cameron GWS
36 Lachie Whitfield GWS
34 Tim Taranto GWS
33 Brad Crouch ADEL
32 Ricky Henderson HAW
Aiden Bonar might be a more realistic target...When is Josh Kelly contracted to? I'd like him on our team please
Mate, how many times can you post coaches votes? I've pulled out plenty of examples where B Crouch has failed to chase. His offensive game is building nicely, but if you think his defensive game is up to scratch then you're a poor judge.
PS he's one above Ricky Henderson. Now, Ricky is having a nice season, but his inclusion shows that these votes aren't reflective of defensive output.
Try to do your own analysis.
Phil is such a phlog.I wonder what Tex said to Phil to annoy him so much
Tex after the game said regarding that mark ... 'i didn't think I had that in me' ? Seemed a very strange comment to me. He worked really hard, was massive in the last quarter.
Look, it's clear that Brad is getting a lot of the ball, although his disposal efficiency means only about two thirds are statistically effective, and the eye test tells you that more than a few of those sell his teammates into trouble. And when your captain has to physically push you to get you to chase, that should indicate your defensive running is something to work on.C’mon this is disingenuous
No, of course it doesn’t isolate defensive output
But it does show overall impact as adjudicated at the highest level
There is no way anyone that high up on the leagues top players gets there by gifting the opposition all sorts of advantages
Their defensive impact is priced in, and when the price is that high, the defensive rating can’t be that low
So no Hendo isn’t a defensive liability and neither is Brouch
Look, it's clear that Brad is getting a lot of the ball, although his disposal efficiency means only about two thirds are statistically effective, and the eye test tells you that more than a few of those sell his teammates into trouble. And when your captain has to physically push you to get you to chase, that should indicate your defensive running is something to work on.
When you consider that coaches votes are given directly after the game, by both coaches, there's a fair chance those votes aren't uppermost in a coaches mind. Hell, the casting of those votes might even be delegated to someone else. We also know that part of coaching is "sending messages". Most importantly, we havent seen any coach put any work into limiting Brads output. In short, I don't think theyre the best indicator of a players overall worth to a team.
I'm enjoying Brad impacting games more, looking fitter, and starting to fulfil his promise. But there's no doubt he has to work on his defensive action, and if you can't see that, you're not watching.
I wrote him off too.Happy to put my hand up and say I wrote off Gallucci too early this year. Has had a great couple of weeks, really handy as that forward-of-centre midfielder, particularly when we're coming out of defence.
Douglas had a shocker. If he was a young player being given a game based on SANFL performances, he'd be straight back down to the twos after that.
O'Brien is determined to take the selection question out of the hands of the coaches. Monstrous performance
Jenkins looking back to his old self again. We should drop him for an extended period every year
I wrote him off too.
But he seems to have a bit of composure around the ball and some footy IQ. Something lacking for a few of our players.
Meanwhile, while you're playing word games, Brad still sucks defensivelyI can’t think many statements that make less sense that suggesting the players who were most influential in the game aren’t in the coaches minds at the the end of the game
That is literally all they have been thinking about for the last 3 hours