Player Watch #34: Jack Graham - Part 2

Remove this Banner Ad

22 wins.
0 draws.
7 losses.

Plus scores, total scores, average scores, personal percentage, whether it was H&A, margins per game, accumulated margins and opponents.

  1. 155 - 51. (155 - 51.) (155 - 51.) (303.92%) (A.) (+ 104.) (+ 104.) (FREM.)
  2. 122 - 81. (277 - 132.) (138.5 - 66.) (209.84%) (H.) (+ 41.) (+ 145.) (STK.)
  3. 91 - 40. (368 - 172.) (122.66 - 57.33.) (213.95%) (A.) (+ 51.) (+ 196.) (GEEL.)
  4. 103 - 67. (471 - 239.) (117.75 - 59.75.) (197.07%) (H.) (+ 36.) (+ 232.) (GWS.)
  5. 108 - 60. (579 - 299.) (115.8 - 59.8.) (193.64%) (A.) (+ 48.) (+ 280.) (ADEL.)
  6. 121 - 95. (700 - 394.) (116.67 - 65.66.) (177.66%) (H.) (+ 26.) (+ 306.) (CARL.)
  7. 82 - 118. (782 - 512.) (111.71 - 73.14.) (152.73%) (A.) (- 36.) (- 36.) (ADEL.)
  8. 102 - 89. (884 - 601.) (110.5 - 75.12.) (147.08%) (H.) (+ 13.) (+ 319.) (HAW.)
  9. 110 - 17. (994 - 618.) (110.44 - 68.66.) (160.84%) (H.) (+ 93.) (+ 412.) (BL.)
  10. 113 - 70. (1107 - 688.) (110.7 - 68.8.) (160.9%) (A.) (+ 43.) (+ 455.) (COLL.)
  11. 110 - 33. (1217 - 721.) (110.63 - 65.54.) (168.79%.) (H.) (+ 77.) (+ 532.) (FREM.)
  12. 82 - 72. (1299 - 793.) (108.25 - 66.08.) (163.80%.) (A.) (+ 10.) (+ 542.) (KANG.)
  13. 83 - 130. (1382 - 923.) (106.31 - 71.) (149.73%.) (A.) (- 47.) (- 83.) (Also, highest score conceded.) (WCE.)
  14. 105 - 77. (1487 - 1000.) (106.21 - 71.43.) (148.7%.) (H.) (+ 28.) (+ 570.) (STK.)
  15. 114 - 43. (1601 - 1043.) (106.73 - 69.53.) (153.5%.) (A.) (+ 71.) (+ 641.) (ESS.)
  16. 83 - 65. (1684 - 1108.) (105.25 - 69.25.) (152%.) (A.) (+ 18.) (+ 659.) (GEEL.)
  17. 93 - 67. (1777 - 1175.) (104.53 - 69.12.) (151.23%.) (H.) (+ 26.) (+ 685.) (SYD.)
  18. 103 - 56. (1880 - 1231.) (104.44 - 68.39.) (152.71%.) (H.) (+ 47.) (+ 732.) (ADEL.)
  19. 125 - 51. (2005 - 1286.) (105.53 - 67.68.) (155.91%.) (A.) (+ 74.) (+ 806.) (GC.)
  20. 81 - 73. (2086 - 1359.) (104.3 - 67.95.) (153.49%.) (H.) (+ 8.) (+ 814.) (ESS.)
  21. 98 - 95. (2184 - 1454.) (104 - 69.24.) (150.20%.) (H.) (+ 3.) (+ 817.) (New lowest winning margin plus highest score conceded when winning. (FOOT.)
  22. 95 - 64. (2279 - 1518.) (103.59 - 69.) (150.13%.) (H.) (+ 31.) (+ 848.) (Easily his quietest finals game.) (HAW.)
  23. 58 - 97. (2337 - 1615.) (101.61 - 70.22.) (144.7%.) (H.) (- 39.) (- 122.) (His lowest AFL score.) (COLL.)
  24. 97 - 64. (2434 - 1679.) (101.41 - 69.96.) (144.97%.) (A.) (+ 33.) (+ 881.) (His highest score in 3 games.) (CARL.)
  25. 66 - 110. (2500 - 1789.) (100 - 71.56.) (139.74%.) (H.) (- 44.) (- 166.) (COLL.)
  26. 76 - 125. (2576 - 1914.) (99.1 - 73.62.) (134.58%.) (A.) (- 49.) (- 215.) (GWS.)
  27. 99 - 92. (2675 - 2006.) (99.1 - 74.3.) (133.35%.) (A but, technically for Jack, H.) (+ 7.) (+ 888.) (PA.)
  28. 37 - 104. (2712 - 2110.) (96.86 - 75.36.) (128.53%.) (H.) (- 67.) (- 282.) (His highest losing AFL margin.) (GEEL.)
  29. 68 - 101. (2780 - 2211.) (95.86 - 76.24.) (125.73%.) (A but, technically for Jack, H.) (+ 7.) (- 315.) (ADEL.)
10 of his 29 games have been in excess of 40 point wins. (Almost a 3rd of his career.)
5 of those 10 games, 70 point wins.

Average winning margin = 40.36 points.
Average losing margin = 45 points.
Average score of games he's played in = 86.05.

Bolded = premiership.
Italicised = losses.
Normal print = wins.
Draws = underlined and italicised.





Done.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

In our top five and he ran out of steam due to the lack of inside midfield support. There were about five occasions he won a hard contested ball and all he had to dish off to was Ellis or Butler. Poor bastard looked demoralised, but he kept on strutting his stuff.
JGraham is good for a hard ball get!
Side needs a few changes to get value out of him...bring Ross back and Cotch!
 
rotation/ran with the couch sisters and sloan, they sliced us up but jack battled away, his disposal was untidy, so he gets a par C+ from me.
You’re bagging Graham as he was our only genuine inside midfielder. Of course his DE is down when he’s the only bloke going in. Get on the Due and Corey/Brando pages as they’re you’re idea of a ball winner.
Graham’s first picked next week out of all of the kids bc he can win his own ball in the stoppages. He’s going to make a powerful midfield when he gets Ross Cotchin and Pickett alongside him and of course Nakkers the forgotten man. All you’ve done all night is bagged our hardest player on the night , yet avoided the real issues in our short people in heart and stature Brando and Butler.
 
Last edited:
You’re bagging Graham as he was our only genuine inside midfield. Of course his DE is down when he’s the only bloke going in. Get on the Due and Corey/Brando pages as they’re you’re idea of a ball winner.
Graham’s first picked next week out of all of the kids bc he can win his own ballin the stoppages. He’s going to make a powerful midfield when he gets Ross Cotchin and Pickett alongside him and of course Nakkers the forgotten man. All you’ve done all night is bagged our hardest player on the night , yet avoided the real issues in our short people in heart and stature Brando and Butler.

Agree Graham, Meatball and Martin battled hard but ultimately got outdone by a bigger well stocked midfield who was getting first use from the ruck

Those three blokes did everything they could
 
Agree Graham, Meatball and Martin battled hard but ultimately got outdone by a bigger well stocked midfield who was getting first use from the ruck

Those three blokes did everything they could
Caddy was and has been woeful in the guts and with his big body he let the boys down. Looked like Townsend out there last night.
 
Caddy was and has been woeful in the guts and with his big body he let the boys down. Looked like Townsend out there last night.

He did seem extremely lost offered nothing at the coal face and even less down forward except for that late goal
 
Graham has to work on his skills and composure. It's all well and good to tackle and compete as he does but if you're going to butcher it all the time it hurts the team. Reminds me of Conca, although I think Graham has better attributes overall
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Was very good tonight


Hes a player man - I know a lot of people think hes a plodder and for all intensive purposes he is, but plenty of plodders go on to be damn fine footballers. He still spreads from the contest ok and Ive often noticed when he looks extra slow its usually on the back of repeat efforts. Would bet my left nut his repeat efforts would be right up there at the club.

Fridge is an apt nickname for him, short by todays midfield standards but unbelievably strong through the core, he can go head to head physically with anyone. He was let off the leash last night - thats the type of footy hes capable of and should be looking to emulate. A good balance between see ball get ball and hitting the opposition and contest hard.
 
Hes a player man - I know a lot of people think hes a plodder and for all intensive purposes he is, but plenty of plodders go on to be damn fine footballers. He still spreads from the contest ok and Ive often noticed when he looks extra slow its usually on the back of repeat efforts. Would bet my left nut his repeat efforts would be right up there at the club.

Fridge is an apt nickname for him, short by todays midfield standards but unbelievably strong through the core, he can go head to head physically with anyone. He was let off the leash last night - thats the type of footy hes capable of and should be looking to emulate. A good balance between see ball get ball and hitting the opposition and contest hard.
Good post. I thought his attack on the footy was brilliant last night and generally used it well. He frustrates me because he has proven what he is capable of but it’s just not there often enough. He is young, so I’ll give him that. Hopefully he can string a few good games in a row and cement his place in the team.
 
Was the last of our problems based on last nights game , No midfield support
These days you need 7-8-9 players running through the midfield we had 3
Those 3 players tried their asses off though.

Hard to have good disposal when most of your outside runners are having a mare unfortunately.
 
Was the last of our problems based on last nights game , No midfield support
These days you need 7-8-9 players running through the midfield we had 3
fair point... higgs and caddy were in there for big chunks which makes 5 but they were diabolical, vloss not much in there helping, probs also points to him playing sore.
 
Last night needs to become more of a week to week type performance rather than a once in a while showing. With better quality support around him his ability to hunt and win the footy will enable us to get the ball going our way more often than not as he'll be feeding the ball out to better ball users.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top