- Nov 6, 2014
- 60,915
- 74,986
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
I guess he’ll get a billion dollar offer.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Richmond v Melbourne - 7:25PM Wed
Squiggle tips Demons at 77% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
Keeping both is wisest
Id back in a team of 11 Gawns and 11 Grundys to make top 4Theoretically, his tenure should be linked to Hayes'. They are in competition to be the #2 ruckman on the list over the next few years, which would eventually lead to them being the #1 in the much longer term. At some point, one of them will have to be cut loose, because you could have 18 All Australian ruckmen on your list, but you'll still only ever be able to play 1-2 of them each week.
We will likely shed one of Hayes or Ladhams and my bet is on Ladhams.
Would love to keep both.
From what Broges said this fella is likely to be one of the best rucks in the comp.We will likely shed one of Hayes or Ladhams and my bet is on Ladhams.
Would love to keep both.
I can’t explain how ******* moronic our club would have to be to keep Ryder but let ladhams go after persisting for him for years when he’s exploded into amazing form and all we would likely get for him would be a 3rd rounder in a poor draft.
I would jettison the entire board, coaching panel, and staff before I would do something this ******* stupid.
We will likely shed one of Hayes or Ladhams and my bet is on Ladhams.
Would love to keep both.
We will likely shed one of Hayes or Ladhams and my bet is on Ladhams.
Would love to keep both.
If Ladhams is willing to stay for a 2-3 year contact, then give it to him. Opportunity and money is elsewhere, but if all is to be believed, he'd prefer to be here.I don’t think it’s about us not wanting Ladhams, it’s about Ladhams actually wanting to play AFL. No young player would pass us the number 1 ruck role to be 3rd string ruck. That’s providing we also lose Ryder. Lycett is number 1 and Hayes will very quickly become number 2, probably as early as next year.
That would mean that Ladhams would have to wait for two long term injuries to get consistent games. Just doesn’t make sense for his own career. It would be horrible to lose him, but I don’t think we have much of a choice.
If I had the choice between keeping Hayes or Ladhams, I would 100% be taking Hayes.
Just hopefully we get well compensated.
Crows need a shedshed ryder instead
North aren't the only team interested in Ladhams.
They need to get it done ASAP or north or someone will offer a godlike offer, like the saints are offering Draper. If that happens ya can’t blame him for going