Opinion Who will be our next head coach?

[BrutThough]

quick straw poll if we have three candidates to choose from who gets your vote ?

Brett Ratten
Brad Scott
Robert Harvey

Ratten

 

[Mowman]

quick straw poll if we have three candidates to choose from who gets your vote ?

Brett Ratten
Brad Scott
Robert Harvey

Ratten

 

[Crusty Undies]

So you saying that Brad Scott has powers of analysis!

I thought the flog was capable of only being either very annoyed
Or really really angry!

I was saying the same thing just a bit more diplomatically

 

[st_trav_ofWA]

if it was down to three who would you prefer to coach in 2020?

 

[Crusty Undies]

Absolutely.

It does make me sick that his BS exit was so easily framed into a positive spin... if it was us... well you know the rest.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Yeh very true.

 

[VDS66]

Nope. And I’m happy to be called a hypocrite over it.
Having said that, Clarkson’s career would be enough of an interview surely?
( kidding)

I don't care what they do. As long as Roo signs off on it, I'm good.

I think they will only have a process if they have no idea who they want and open the field.

Bassett is a sharp operator and he will have sussed out or sounded out potential candidates by now.

If we have multiple candidates interested, then they would use a panel.

If they have a preferred candidate who is willing to accept the job, they wont IMO.

 

[st_trav_ofWA]

Ratten

Ratten

Ratten

i just opened a poll for this question

 

[VDS66]

Bevo

 

[Grav]

Would love Harvey but wouldn’t want him to fail, so will go for Ratten. (Irish or what?)

 

[theprospect]

Ratten. Never should have been sacked in the first place and had a great stint at Hawthorn under Clarkson. Players also cite him as a massive influence around the club. The logical choice for me.

 

[theprospect]

Bevo

Won't be going anywhere for a long time, unfortunately.

 

[Verdun]

Ratts

 

[mightymalaka]

i just opened a poll for this question

Straw Poll's are just just a flimsy Straw man's argument!

Robert Harvey.......Yeah f#ck it why not!

 

[gringo2011]

i just opened a poll for this question

And I'm on Ratten too.

 

[triggering bro]

You have to trust the process though. I'm old enough to know that you get your result and back fill the process to suit the outcome. I ave a friend in marketing and he's just posted a thing saying they have worked out focus groups are full of s**t and unreliable. No s**t, you basically pay a lot of people to make your set outcome.

It’s been like that for a longtime but some places have changed. The more progressive organisations will run a more independent process whereby a panel will consist of one person working within the relevant area, another person from another area within the organisation & the third person external from the organisation & from a separate profession.

There is still the risk of the person within the relevant area contaminating the process by attempting to manipulate the panels decision making however the risk is mitigated by having three people that have not had much/anything to do with each other prior to the process.

If we run a three person panel & Scott is a candidate then it becomes impossible for Lethlean to be part of the panel & he would excuse himself because you run the risk of candidates not applying because they see the conflict of interest so don’t even bother.

Andrew Bassett with his corporate background & not to mention he owns a recruitment agency becomes one panel member. Call him the internal member from his area. The second member would be someone from within the industry so perhaps Leigh Matthews or Paul Roos or someone like that. The third person would be someone completely independent from the industry, it could be a psychologist (although that could be a fourth member to provide oversight from a psych POV) or a CEO/executive member of another organisation govt/private doesn’t matter.

If we run it properly with a good mix of panel members we should go alright. Picking the panel members is the key because you obviously wouldn’t want Lethlean, Hanners old man & some staffy that he’s running on the side to make up the panel.

 

[BrutThough]

Ratten. The only one out of the three choices I would be happy to see appointed.

 

[gringo2011]

Scott seems popular.

 

[Keg on legs]

Cho

 

[triggering bro]

From those three I would be happy to take the risk on Harvey. Quiet achiever & an introvert however I’m sure he would apply extremely high performance standards & his competitive nature would mean he would want to be surrounded by the very best people in the industry. Harvey & a strong DoC is not a bad combination.

The other two we kind of know what we get. Both are Richo/GOPs, low risk, low reward.

Get Banger.

 

[Dr Spaceman]

 

[austinnn]

Can't see a poll in the app, do I'll just guess at the options, in order:

Beverage
Ratten
Voss

 

[Joffaboy]

Out of Ratten and Scott, I would go Rats but we don't know who else is interested.

 

[Joffaboy]

Rats

 

[VDS66]

Out of Ratten and Scott, I would go Rats but we don't know who else is interested.

Playfair?

 

[Joffaboy]

Playfair?

Didn't take long