Desperation probably.That was the position taken on the first page of the thread.
So ... what was the purpose of the ad?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: St Kilda v Western Bulldogs - 7:30PM Thu
Squiggle tips Saints at 51% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
Desperation probably.That was the position taken on the first page of the thread.
So ... what was the purpose of the ad?
Same as Playboy going woke. Accede to the dominant ideology in the hope you capture whatever remains of a diminishing market share.Desperation probably.
Why, it had no effect on sales trends dummy?I'm impressed that you're too stupid to work out the connection between the two. If your experiencing current reduced demand and thus reduced revenue/profitability in your industry, it is not wise to go out and attack a majority of your consumer base and put them off getting your stuff.
Their last play.Same as Playboy going woke. Accede to the dominant ideology in the hope you capture whatever remains of a diminishing market share.
No s**t.The ad was a response to that.
But they, and plenty of other brands thought/hoped it would. Why?Why, it had no effect on sales trends dummy?
They probably didn't and were running out of ideas.But they, and plenty of other brands thought/hoped it would. Why?
There’s the Burger King ad where they turn a burger into a diamond and use that diamond for a same sex wedding.They probably didn't and were running out of ideas.
Some algorithm probably identified an under-serviced market and they took a swing.
"Woke capitalism" is a scourge, and where it works for some companies, say Nike, it's usually employed as a PR strategy as opposed to a strategy for market expansion.
Most progressives acknowledge this is about marketing. Only those who get outraged by it take it at face value.There’s the Burger King ad where they turn a burger into a diamond and use that diamond for a same sex wedding.
These things look like parodies of progressivism created by 4Chan, yet somehow they’re real.
But why such a narrow section of the market that has marginable profitability? What does it signal?Most progressives acknowledge this is about marketing. Only those who get outraged by it take it at face value.
Why shouldn't they? There are also examples like those from QANTAS which can really be taken as face value especially when looking at the sexual orientation of the CEO.Most progressives acknowledge this is about marketing. Only those who get outraged by it take it at face value.
They're corporations. Their function is the accumulation of profit.Why shouldn't they? There are also examples like those from QANTAS which can really be taken as face value especially when looking at the sexual orientation of the CEO.
Is that their mission? Are corporations now fronts for ideological messaging?47 pages of conservative rustled jimmies. Mission accomplished Gillette, mission accomplished.
Eg how many companies these days stake their marketing on married heterosexual companies with children?
Its only ok to rustle conservative jimmies, if you rustle lefty jimmies you are a racist/bigot/naziIs that their mission? Are corporations now fronts for ideological messaging?
So if their add campaign has no net positive benefit like the Gillette campaign has shown why would they want to be known in a light which is negative and leaves customer feeling disillusioned?They're corporations. Their function is the accumulation of profit.
The ideological distinction I would draw is that it is pure liberalism, the commodification of social values and that's the target.There’s the Burger King ad where they turn a burger into a diamond and use that diamond for a same sex wedding.
These things look like parodies of progressivism created by 4Chan, yet somehow they’re real.
They're fronts for whatever will shift product. You clowns whingeing about someone wanting people to be nice to women clearly furthers that goal for them.Is that their mission? Are corporations now fronts for ideological messaging?
Because it was simple marketing trickery. It has nothing to do with social values and everything to do with a hail mary for expanded market share.So if their add campaign has no net positive benefit like the Gillette campaign has shown why would they want to be known in a light which is negative and leaves customer feeling disillusioned?
They didn't intend it to not work.So if their add campaign has no net positive benefit like the Gillette campaign has shown why would they want to be known in a light which is negative and leaves customer feeling disillusioned?
No.Is that their mission? Are corporations now fronts for ideological messaging?
What it shows is that some people are quite happy to be proselytised to, even those who think themselves as open minded.Its only ok to rustle conservative jimmies, if you rustle lefty jimmies you are a racist/bigot/nazi
*Capitalism sucks*They didn't intend it to not work.
Be as disillusioned as you want. It says nothing about the message, taken out of it's marketing context.