- Aug 21, 2008
- 5,681
- 10,728
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
...the team that lost the NBA finals this year?
We're a s**t Show - Fagan is a Complete Fraud, We're Rotten to the Core
- Thread starter 1970crow
- Start date
- Tagged users None
...the team that lost the NBA finals this year?
Bruh Klay ACL and Durant Achillies
Dixie Normous
Premiership Player
- Banned
- #1,578
Big Gazoongas
Cancelled
The whole club is in the "bunker down" phase.
The best they could do was send Rob Chapman on 5AA to face Rowey. It was so courageous of Rob to front up.
His acceptance of everything s**t about this club was astounding.
The best they could do was send Rob Chapman on 5AA to face Rowey. It was so courageous of Rob to front up.
His acceptance of everything s**t about this club was astounding.
- Oct 28, 2014
- 9,791
- 23,691
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
It’s lots of things, but not astounding.
- Thread starter
- #1,583
Nice to see it back on page 1.
Dixie Normous
Premiership Player
- Banned
- #1,584
Good to see Andy tweeted on Saturday night to boost our collective morale.
- Dec 29, 2000
- 23,611
- 20,860
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
Nah, we will be right.
Those supporters with multi personality disorders will buy extra memberships.
There’s only so many Alex can buy
jackster83
The leader of the bunch.
Still in the top eight. Nothing to worry about.
We really are heading down the Freo path.
Interesting the have listed how many 3 game memberships there are across the league.
The only membership figure of interest is 11 game members.
Why dont the AFL break down the membership categories.
AFC: 40k 11 game members, 10k 3 game members, 40k digital members
PAFC: 5k 11 game members, 30k 3 game member, 10k pet members
I heard a radio ad this week for Port Power playing Sydney, tickets and memberships still available - they are still selling 3 game membership with only 2 games remaining
There's a sucker born every minute.
The only membership figure of interest is 11 game members.
Why dont the AFL break down the membership categories.
AFC: 40k 11 game members, 10k 3 game members, 40k digital members
PAFC: 5k 11 game members, 30k 3 game member, 10k pet members
I heard a radio ad this week for Port Power playing Sydney, tickets and memberships still available - they are still selling 3 game membership with only 2 games remaining
There's a sucker born every minute.
Interesting the have listed how many 3 game memberships there are across the league.
The only membership figure of interest is 11 game members.
Why dont the AFL break down the membership categories.
AFC: 40k 11 game members, 10k 3 game members, 40k digital members
PAFC: 5k 11 game members, 30k 3 game member, 10k pet members
I heard a radio ad this week for Port Power playing Sydney, tickets and memberships still available - they are still selling 3 game membership with only 2 games remaining
There's a sucker born every minute.
Where do us Vic Members sit on this list?
- Oct 8, 2012
- 16,281
- 19,963
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
Interesting the have listed how many 3 game memberships there are across the league.
The only membership figure of interest is 11 game members.
Why dont the AFL break down the membership categories.
AFC: 40k 11 game members, 10k 3 game members, 40k digital members
PAFC: 5k 11 game members, 30k 3 game member, 10k pet members
I heard a radio ad this week for Port Power playing Sydney, tickets and memberships still available - they are still selling 3 game membership with only 2 games remaining
There's a sucker born every minute.
Hopefully our membership drops by at least 10% next year.
Not in terms of premiership, we had to pinch one of the premiership when we had the chance in either 05/06, 2012 or 2017.....West Coast took their's. And pity we don't have a 80K new stadium as well, I also blame Port Power for that......
60k stadium
- Jan 6, 2018
- 10,660
- 12,193
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Norwood
Adelaide Oval has the opportunity to be redeveloped again. The existing oval had little to do with Port Power and a lot to do with the SACA and SACA members
Another reason I'm not in favour of the hotel development.
The initial redevelopment cost tax payers $550M (including the bridge) when we could have built a new 80K stadium to rival the MCG for $750M (but likely $1B). Port Power were all for moving there as they were pretty much in a dire situation both on and off field at that time, we wanted to wait for a better deal, if none of the AFL clubs supported it, then it would never have gotten redeveloped even if SACA wanted to as none of the AFL club would play there.
- Jan 6, 2018
- 10,660
- 12,193
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Norwood
lol .. the better deal
The better deal was never going to deliver an enclosed or fully enclosed stadium with 60K seating ..
I'm a SACA member, I still remember what I voted for.
Definitely not at the costing the Liberals said it would, the new WA Optus stadium cost $1.6B in the end (and that's not enclosed).
- Jan 6, 2018
- 10,660
- 12,193
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Norwood
OK .. maybe you should let it go now
- Thread starter
- #1,599
Rubbish, once the SANFL were on board, we had no choice but to be on board. And SANFL got the best deal of the lot. Got to sell West Lakes and continue earning bucketloads from a stadium they didn’t even own.
So you are saying if both AFL clubs didn't agree to relocate to AO, the SANFL would have still be on board knowing there will be no football played there....hell the Labor government would have dump the decision despite what the SANFL wanted if both AFL club didn't wanted it, but since Port Power agree, the Crows had no choice.
Similar threads
