Demon bhoy
Club Legend
- Oct 7, 2017
- 1,665
- 1,495
- AFL Club
- Melbourne
Calling me a campaigner was at least factualWow, just wow. And he called you a campaigner, lol
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Richmond v Melbourne - 7:25PM Wed
Squiggle tips Demons at 77% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
Calling me a campaigner was at least factualWow, just wow. And he called you a campaigner, lol
We’re trading Topkent and Demon bhoy for pick 6. It’s all very exciting if you ignore their neck-issues and poor conditioning.Got excited to see there were some new posts, thought there might be some new info as to who we are into.... nope.
That’s not enough for 2 A graders, ******* stitched up againWe’re trading Topkent and Demon bhoy for pick 6. It’s all very exciting if you ignore their neck-issues and poor conditioning.
We’re trading Topkent and Demon bhoy for pick 6. It’s all very exciting if you ignore their neck-issues and poor conditioning.
We can trade this years but then would have to use one next year, unless we applied to the afl for permission to trade itSo whats the deal with using a first in a 4 year period? Can we or cant we trade ours? Is it 2 1sts in a 4 year window? Cause we havent used any in 3 years and this 1 will make it 4. Or did that rule start a year or 2 after? Dont want to get to where we need to use 2 next year and fall behind 8ball by trading future 1st just to use 2 next year in what i read was a pretty weak draft
So whats the deal with using a first in a 4 year period? Can we or cant we trade ours? Is it 2 1sts in a 4 year window? Cause we havent used any in 3 years and this 1 will make it 4. Or did that rule start a year or 2 after? Dont want to get to where we need to use 2 next year and fall behind 8ball by trading future 1st just to use 2 next year in what i read was a pretty weak draft
So its only 1 every 4 years and not 2? I thought it was 2
Quality AFL.com.au journalism there … Surely it's not that hard for them to do a quick bit of research to see that unlike Hawthorn, we do have a 1st rounder this year.
Think thats from last year hey?Quality AFL.com.au journalism there … Surely it's not that hard for them to do a quick bit of research to see that unlike Hawthorn, we do have a 1st rounder this year.
So whats the 4 year requirement? 1 or 2 first rounders? We havent used 1 in 3 years(16,17,18)so if its a rolling 4 year thing then not using 1 this year is 4 years so how does that work? If ya missing 4 complete years then have to use it on the 5th isnt that a 5 year rule?? Got me ****ed
Ah yeah, you're right … I thought that originally, then something made me think it was recent.Think thats from last year hey?
Yeah it doesn't make sense. It's supposed to be 2 picks over a 4 year period I thought, by that, even using our 1st this year we're 1 short aren't we?So whats the 4 year requirement? 1 or 2 first rounders? We havent used 1 in 3 years(16,17,18)so if its a rolling 4 year thing then not using 1 this year is 4 years so how does that work? If ya missing 4 complete years then have to use it on the 5th isnt that a 5 year rule?? Got me f’ed
Surely it's not that hard for you to do some research and see that unlike the discussion points from this thread, it's from last year?Ah yeah, you're right … I thought that originally, then something made me think it was recent.
Yeah i cant get my head around itAh yeah, you're right … I thought that originally, then something made me think it was recent.
Yeah it doesn't make sense. It's supposed to be 2 picks over a 4 year period I thought, by that, even using our 1st this year we're 1 short aren't we?
Well said, it's a shame I now have to ban you for a week, your contribution will be missed.Surely it's not that hard for you to do some research and see that unlike the discussion points from this thread, it's from last year?
Ah yeah, you're right … I thought that originally, then something made me think it was recent.
Yeah it doesn't make sense. It's supposed to be 2 picks over a 4 year period I thought, by that, even using our 1st this year we're 1 short aren't we?
Yes but how is that a rolling 4 year rule? Its not if its going into the 5th. The rule makes no sense to meWe need to use 2 in two years. Either 2 this year, 2 next, or 1 in each.
Yes but how is that a rolling 4 year rule? Its not if its going into the 5th. The rule makes no sense to me
I dunno maybe the immediate mention of how I felt sorry for 3 sentences down but obviously that doesnt fit your narrative