2019 2nd Ashes Test - Lords 14-18 August 2019

Remove this Banner Ad

marks out of 10:

Warner 0
Bancroft 1
Khawaja 1
Smith 9
Head 5
Wade 1
Paine 1
Cummins 8
Siddle 6
Hazlewood 7
Lyon 4

Labuschagne 10

Great team performance.
Smith deserves a 10. Head at least a 6 IMO.

Siddle should be rated higher than Hazlewood too I reckon.
 
If he had the choice I'd assuming bouncy and swinging.
If so, Starc has to come in, probably for Siddle.

If those are the conditions you want Pattinson in not Starc.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Warner hasn't even made it to 20 runs total for the series, as crap as Bancroft has been his innings last night (16) was only two short of Warners series total.
So what's the solution then ? you would pick Bancroft ?
 
You are picking Harris off Australian conditions form, that's my issue. Said it 3 months ago and I'll say it again, what batsmen do in Australia is irrelevant at best when we are talking about an Ashes series in England. You need to pick players that play well over there. These batsmen should have been playing County cricket or even league cricket at a local club in England. Get used to the conditions, get form. Is it any surprise Labaushgne looked good after getting over 1000+ runs in Div 2. Form in these conditions is a good start.

I'm picking Harris on the form we have available which is more than what can be said for Warner and his Sheffield Shield runs are not irrelevant at all.

Warner doesn't play well (and isn't playing well) in England so why is he being picked?

Also it's one innings from Labuschagne, while it was a good one you're taking far too much out of one innings.
 
Smith deserves a 10. Head at least a 6 IMO.

Siddle should be rated higher than Hazlewood too I reckon.

Agreed.

Personally

Warner- 0
Bancroft- 3 (2 for the catch and 1 for his second innings)
Khawaja- 3 (decent in the first, but a liability in the field)
Smith- 10 (nothing more needs to be said)
Head- 7 (very important to us not losing)
Wade- 1 (a point for his ground fielding)
Paine- 0 (awful game, terrible call at toss, awful DRS reviews, and failed with the bat in both innings)
Cummins- 8 (very good outing)
Siddle- 6 (solid from Siddle)
Hazelwood- 4 (good opening spell, mediocre afterwards)
Lyon-5 (not his best game, wasn't awful, but wasn't great)
 
Could we go with 5 batsmen? Especially if 2 of them are Cummins and Starc who can bat.
Drop one of the 3/4 woefully out of form batsmen.

NO.

End of story. You don't go into a test over in England with less than 6 specialists.
 
Agreed.

Personally

Warner- 0
Bancroft- 3 (2 for the catch and 1 for his second innings)
Khawaja- 3 (decent in the first, but a liability in the field)
Smith- 10 (nothing more needs to be said)
Head- 7 (very important to us not losing)
Wade- 1 (a point for his ground fielding)
Paine- 0 (awful game, terrible call at toss, awful DRS reviews, and failed with the bat in both innings)
Cummins- 8 (very good outing)
Siddle- 6 (solid from Siddle)
Hazelwood- 4 (good opening spell, mediocre afterwards)
Lyon-5 (not his best game, wasn't awful, but wasn't great)
I'd give Lyon a 4. Was awful in the second innings and the missed LBWs were his fault, not Paine's.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

I'm picking Harris on the form we have available which is more than what can be said for Warner and his Sheffield Shield runs are not irrelevant at all.

Warner doesn't play well (and isn't playing well) in England so why is he being picked?

Also it's one innings from Labuschagne, while it was a good one you're taking far too much out of one innings.

Each to their own. Lets agree to disagree, we both have our views. I personally view conditions form more than what someone got on a road in Australia. Completely different conditions.
 
Well really we have 2.... so we are 4 short.

Whilst Cummins is handy, you'd have to go with a Mitch Marsh or Nesser to do what you want anyway. Those two are probably number 7's, the rest are 9's.
 
I'd give Lyon a 4. Was awful in the second innings and the missed LBWs were his fault, not Paine's.

Yep , happy with that, 4 or 5, pretty similar from me. Disagree on the DRS being Lyon's fault though, as a keeper surely you know where the thing is going!
 
Each to their own. Lets agree to disagree, we both have our views. I personally view conditions form more than what someone got on a road in Australia. Completely different conditions.
Except they haven't been completely different conditions, they've produced wickets not much different to those in Australia.
 
The ICC needs to be stronger on players moving around countries. Once you have represented a test nation at under 19 level you shouldn’t be able to change. Unless it is along the lines of Michael DiVenuto leaving Australia to play for Italy.

But once you have played under 19s for a test nation you shouldn’t be able to play for any other test nation
Firstly, I think you're conveniently making a rule that would rule Jofra Archer out of this series.

Secondly, there are plenty of good reasons for someone to move countries after the age of 19, and you risk excluding people for what is a fairly arbitrary rule.

Thirdly, pretty much every sport n the world allows you to change countries given a certain qualification criteria.

Fourthly, you're forcing 16-18 year olds to make a decision that could be to their detriment. Imagine being someone who could qualify for more than one country - they may just stay out of underage competition to avoid having to make a decision, which could hurt them in the long run.


And on Archer specifically, he has a British father, and has only ever played first class cricket in England. He moved from Barbados to England, and so I don't see why he should be excluded from playing for them because he played a few warm-up games for the West Indies under 19s.
 
Yep , happy with that, 4 or 5, pretty similar from me. Disagree on the DRS being Lyon's fault though, as a keeper surely you know where the thing is going!
Paine's view is almost entirely blocked when the ball hits the pads. Lyon's isn't.
 
Out of the options we have I'd rather Bancroft/Harris.

I'm not advocating that Bancroft is the solution but out of him and Warner he's harder to get out and looks more likely to grind out a score right now.
Exactly and that's the issue we have . We had a decent fairly in form opener ( Harris ) but went with two guys without test cricket behind for 12 months .

Now we have the 3 openers on tour with zero form
 
Paine's view is almost entirely blocked when the ball hits the pads. Lyon's isn't.

It's more the second one I have an issue with. At worst it's umpires call, you don't lose challenges for that. They should have learnt from the first one
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top