Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Smith deserves a 10. Head at least a 6 IMO.marks out of 10:
Warner 0
Bancroft 1
Khawaja 1
Smith 9
Head 5
Wade 1
Paine 1
Cummins 8
Siddle 6
Hazlewood 7
Lyon 4
Labuschagne 10
Great team performance.
If he had the choice I'd assuming bouncy and swinging.
If so, Starc has to come in, probably for Siddle.
No way. If we want extra wheels for whatever reason bring in Pattinson. Personally I’d keep the team the same.If he had the choice I'd assuming bouncy and swinging.
If so, Starc has to come in, probably for Siddle.
If those are the conditions you want Pattinson in not Starc.
So what's the solution then ? you would pick Bancroft ?Warner hasn't even made it to 20 runs total for the series, as crap as Bancroft has been his innings last night (16) was only two short of Warners series total.
Neither one thing nor the other.Does anyone know what is happening with Kurtis Patterson?
You are picking Harris off Australian conditions form, that's my issue. Said it 3 months ago and I'll say it again, what batsmen do in Australia is irrelevant at best when we are talking about an Ashes series in England. You need to pick players that play well over there. These batsmen should have been playing County cricket or even league cricket at a local club in England. Get used to the conditions, get form. Is it any surprise Labaushgne looked good after getting over 1000+ runs in Div 2. Form in these conditions is a good start.
Smith deserves a 10. Head at least a 6 IMO.
Siddle should be rated higher than Hazlewood too I reckon.
Could we go with 5 batsmen? Especially if 2 of them are Cummins and Starc who can bat.
Drop one of the 3/4 woefully out of form batsmen.
I'd give Lyon a 4. Was awful in the second innings and the missed LBWs were his fault, not Paine's.Agreed.
Personally
Warner- 0
Bancroft- 3 (2 for the catch and 1 for his second innings)
Khawaja- 3 (decent in the first, but a liability in the field)
Smith- 10 (nothing more needs to be said)
Head- 7 (very important to us not losing)
Wade- 1 (a point for his ground fielding)
Paine- 0 (awful game, terrible call at toss, awful DRS reviews, and failed with the bat in both innings)
Cummins- 8 (very good outing)
Siddle- 6 (solid from Siddle)
Hazelwood- 4 (good opening spell, mediocre afterwards)
Lyon-5 (not his best game, wasn't awful, but wasn't great)
So what's the solution then ? you would pick Bancroft ?
NO.
End of story. You don't go into a test over in England with less than 6 specialists.
I'm picking Harris on the form we have available which is more than what can be said for Warner and his Sheffield Shield runs are not irrelevant at all.
Warner doesn't play well (and isn't playing well) in England so why is he being picked?
Also it's one innings from Labuschagne, while it was a good one you're taking far too much out of one innings.
Well really we have 2.... so we are 4 short.
I'd give Lyon a 4. Was awful in the second innings and the missed LBWs were his fault, not Paine's.
Except they haven't been completely different conditions, they've produced wickets not much different to those in Australia.Each to their own. Lets agree to disagree, we both have our views. I personally view conditions form more than what someone got on a road in Australia. Completely different conditions.
Firstly, I think you're conveniently making a rule that would rule Jofra Archer out of this series.The ICC needs to be stronger on players moving around countries. Once you have represented a test nation at under 19 level you shouldn’t be able to change. Unless it is along the lines of Michael DiVenuto leaving Australia to play for Italy.
But once you have played under 19s for a test nation you shouldn’t be able to play for any other test nation
Paine's view is almost entirely blocked when the ball hits the pads. Lyon's isn't.Yep , happy with that, 4 or 5, pretty similar from me. Disagree on the DRS being Lyon's fault though, as a keeper surely you know where the thing is going!
Exactly and that's the issue we have . We had a decent fairly in form opener ( Harris ) but went with two guys without test cricket behind for 12 months .Out of the options we have I'd rather Bancroft/Harris.
I'm not advocating that Bancroft is the solution but out of him and Warner he's harder to get out and looks more likely to grind out a score right now.
Paine's view is almost entirely blocked when the ball hits the pads. Lyon's isn't.
Could we go with 5 batsmen?