Religion Pell Guilty!

[Strange Cat]

Comensoli will live to regret this for the rest of his sad, pathetic closeted life

You can only hope

 

[BruceFromBalnarring]

The mistaken identity argument is the biggest crock of s**t.

Victims don’t make a mistake on who abused them, especially when it’s someone they’ve known

I don't think that's a mistake. I think that bit was calculated.

 

[Happy Mastenator]

Just rad up on the Southwell matter. Jesus.

Southwell Report: The truth about the so-called 'exoneration' of George Pell

Cardinal George Pell was not 'exonerated' of claims of child sexual abuse, as has been claimed, by an independent investigation, writes Tess Lawrence.

independentaustralia.net

I’d feel sorry for Pell given he has clearly lived a life of a closeted, confused, sexuality, except for the fact that he’s abused multiple boys and the negative impact he’s had on their lives.

Hope he dies before he’s released.

 

[Happy Mastenator]

I don't think that's a mistake. I think that bit was calculated.

So you think they purposely accused Pell even though they knew it wasn’t him?

 

[Sentinel]

Comensoli will live to regret this for the rest of his sad, pathetic closeted life

I highly doubt it unfortunately. He's just as bad as the rest of them, and knew what he was saying.

 

[BruceFromBalnarring]

So you think they purposely accused Pell even though they knew it wasn’t him?

Well it's my theory. Pell simply couldn't have done it. I don't care how many jurors say otherwise.

 

[Happy Mastenator]

Comensoli will live to regret this for the rest of his sad, pathetic closeted life

Narrator: he didn’t.

 

[Kane McGoodwin]

They had to, at the absolute very least, dismiss the second charge. There was no evidence led that could possibly sustain the second charge.

The complainant insisted in evidence it occurred before Christmas. The objective evidence was that it couldn't have.

There is absolutely no justification whatsoever for the Appeal Court not to have acquitted on that second charge. None.

Lol, so you have a better understanding than the esteemed judges.

Honestly, do you think Catholic priests are above the law & should be allowed to abuse children, because of their special standing in society?

 

[western royboy]

I highly doubt it unfortunately. He's just as bad as the rest of them, and knew what he was saying.

He definitely knew what he was saying, but it will stay with him like the Fisher “dwelling crankily on old wounds” and the Hart “Go to hell bitch”

 

[Kane McGoodwin]

I don't think that's a mistake. I think that bit was calculated.

Yet you have no evidence of this.

You are the lowest form of society when you call a brave witness who was sexually abused a liar, when they were thoroughly cross-examined... yet you protect a proven paedophile Pell, who was too gutless to be cross-examined.

 

[The Warlord]

I'll argue reason, logic and law. I'll leave the other stuff to you.

The law has proven your arguments wrong.

 

[The Warlord]

I haven't read Weinberg yet but the Judgement of Ferguson and Maxwell can, viewing it in its most favourable terms, only be described as "High Court, you do it, because we haven't got the courage."

Yes, that's exactly how it reads ffs.

 

[Happy Mastenator]

The high court won’t touch this case

 

[BruceFromBalnarring]

Yet you have no evidence of this.

You are the lowest form of society when you call a brave witness who was sexually abused a liar, when they were thoroughly cross-examined... yet you protect a proven paedophile Pell, who was too gutless to be cross-examined.

I did say it was a theory. At another point I said it was a suspicion.

I've given, repeatedly, my foundations for its formulation.

It makes more sense than the sudden vaporisation of a dozen odd altar boys, a Master of Ceremonies, a sacristant, various odd money counters and whoever else was coming and going in that room.

Or the vision of an Archbishop, dressed in all his gear, racing past the procession to get back to the sacristy to bust a couple boys drinking "sweet red wine" which was apparently only white as evidenced by purchase orders etc.

 

[BruceFromBalnarring]

The high court won’t touch this case

The High Court won't have a choice. The SCA have turned Reasonable Doubt on its head. Leaving aside the various opinions on Pell, the decision can't be allowed to stand as precedent.

 

[Happy Mastenator]

The High Court won't have a choice. The SCA have turned Reasonable Doubt on its head. Leaving aside the various opinions on Pell, the decision can't be allowed to stand as precedent.

Well given your track record of predictions in this thread I guess that means it’s all over

 

[BruceFromBalnarring]

Well given your track record of predictions in this thread I guess that means it’s all over

You make a very good point.

 

[The Warlord]

The High Court won't have a choice. The SCA have turned Reasonable Doubt on its head. Leaving aside the various opinions on Pell, the decision can't be allowed to stand as precedent.

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha.

 

[Number37]

The High Court won't have a choice. The SCA have turned Reasonable Doubt on its head. Leaving aside the various opinions on Pell, the decision can't be allowed to stand as precedent.

BS.
That is a gross misrepresentation of the SCA's decision.

 

[The Warlord]

Well given your track record of predictions in this thread I guess that means it’s all over

"The Vatican in over the top!"

 

[Number37]

The High Court won't have a choice. The SCA have turned Reasonable Doubt on its head. Leaving aside the various opinions on Pell, the decision can't be allowed to stand as precedent.

Except in certain limited circumstances, no attempt should be made to explain or embellish the meaning of the phrase “beyond reasonable doubt” : R v Green


How you can claim that reasonable doubt has been turned on its head by the judgment of the SCA is completely ridiculous.

 

[Colonial]

The High Court won't have a choice. The SCA have turned Reasonable Doubt on its head. Leaving aside the various opinions on Pell, the decision can't be allowed to stand as precedent.

Didn't you say the Appeals won't have a choice and the decision will be overturned?

 

[BruceFromBalnarring]

Didn't you say the Appeals won't have a choice and the decision will be overturned?

Yeap. I did.

 

[Colonial]

Yeap. I did.

So your record/knowledge on this isn't at 100% since we have gone through a few stages and each time you are proven wrong.

 

[Cooldude]

He should see that being a lone voice usually means you are the one who is incorrect.

Nah it's the complete opposite, being the lone voice reinforces how he is the only special one who can see the truth and how the mob is persecuting him for being the only enlightened one

It's the classic narcissistic victim mentality that Christianity has drilled into these people, they cannot wait to make themselves a martyr just to look special