Nope. This series has 1981 written all over it. Australia win the first test. Rain ruins the second which ends in a draw. Then the third test - at Headingley - where England win the unwinnable. Or rather, Australia lose the unloseable. It happens on the back of a blistering century from a controversial all-rounder.
Any of this sounding familiar?
ROFL. IMO smith will be the difference between the 2 sides. The aussies will win the next 2 tests if he plays in them. When the series is over people will look back and say the poms only won that third test because smith didn't play.